Bourbaki

Definition 3

Tag 0DIS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DIS].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 1. Formes sesquilinéaires

A bilinear mapping Φ\Phi of E×FE \times F into GG is said to be degenerate on the right (resp. on the left) if there exists a nonzero element y0y_0 of FF (resp. x0x_0 of EE) such that Φ(x,y0)=0\Phi(x, y_0) = 0 for all x∈Ex \in E (resp. Φ(x0,y)=0\Phi(x_0, y) = 0 for all y∈Fy \in F). We say that Φ\Phi is degenerate if it is degenerate on the right or if it is degenerate on the left.

For Φ\Phi to be nondegenerate on the right (resp. on the left) it is necessary and sufficient that the linear mapping associated on the right (resp. on the left) to Φ\Phi be injective; saying that Φ\Phi is nondegenerate therefore means that the associated linear mappings dΦd_\Phi and sΦs_\Phi are both injective.

Let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} and (fk)k∈K(f_k)_{k \in K} be two families of elements of EE and FF, and let (ai)i∈I(a_i)_{i \in I} and (bk)k∈K(b_k)_{k \in K} be two families of elements of AA and BB, all but a finite number of which are zero. It follows from equalities (1) to (4), by induction on the number of nonzero coefficients, that we have

Φ(∑iaiei,∑kfkbk)=∑i,kaiΦ(ei,fk)bk. \Phi(\sum_i a_i e_i, \sum_k f_k b_k) = \sum_{i,k} a_i \Phi(e_i, f_k) b_k.

If (ei)(e_i) and (fk)(f_k) are systems of generators of the modules EE and FF, Φ\Phi is therefore completely determined by the elements gik=Φ(ei,fk)g_{ik} = \Phi(e_i, f_k). If (ei)(e_i) and (fk)(f_k) are bases of EE and FF and if elements gikg_{ik} of GG (i∈I,k∈Ki \in I, k \in K) are given, then the formula

Φ(∑iaiei,∑kfkbk)=∑i,kaigikbk \Phi(\sum_i a_i e_i, \sum_k f_k b_k) = \sum_{i,k} a_i g_{ik} b_k

defines a mapping of E×FE \times F into GG, which is bilinear and satisfies Φ(ei,fk)=gik\Phi(e_i, f_k) = g_{ik}. When (ei)(e_i) and (fk)(f_k) are finite bases, we call (Φ(ei,fk))(\Phi(e_i, f_k)) the matrix of Φ\Phi with respect to these bases.

The bilinear mappings of E×FE \times F into GG obviously form a subgroup of the additive group of mappings of E×FE \times F into GG. On the other hand, let aa (resp. bb) be an element of the center of AA (resp. BB); then the mapping aΦba \Phi b of E×FE \times F into GG defined by (aΦb)(x,y)=a.Φ(x,y).b(a \Phi b)(x, y) = a . \Phi(x, y) . b is bilinear. The set of bilinear mappings of E×FE \times F into GG is thus endowed with a bimodule structure over the centers of AA and BB.

Let E' (resp. F') be a left A-module (resp. a right B-module), u (resp. v) a homomorphism of E into E' (resp. of F into F') and Φ′\Phi' a bilinear mapping of E′×F′E' \times F' into G. The inverse image of Φ′\Phi' (relative to u and v) is called the bilinear mapping Φ\Phi of E×FE \times F into G defined by

Φ(x,y)=Φ′(u(x),v(y))(x∈E, y∈F). \Phi(x, y) = \Phi'(u(x), v(y)) \qquad (x \in E,\ y \in F).
One readily verifies that
dΦ(y)=dΦ′(v(y))∘uandsΦ(x)=sΦ′(u(x))∘v d_{\Phi}(y) = d_{\Phi'}(v(y)) \circ u \qquad \text{and} \qquad s_{\Phi}(x) = s_{\Phi'}(u(x)) \circ v
for all x∈E, y∈Fx \in E,\ y \in F.

Let Φ\Phi be a bilinear mapping of E×FE \times F into G, and h a homomorphism (for the structures of (A, B)-bimodules) of G into another (A, B)-bimodule G′G'. Then h∘Φh \circ \Phi is a bilinear mapping of E×FE \times F into G′G'.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.