Let E be a left A-module and F a right B-module; put E′=A′⊗AE and F′=F⊗BB′. For every bilinear mapping Φ of E×F into G, there exists one and only one bilinear mapping Φ′ of E′×F′ into G′ such that
Φ′(a′⊗x,y⊗b′)=a′.u(Φ(x,y)).b′
whatever a′∈A′, b′∈B′, x∈E, y∈F.
The uniqueness of Φ′ follows from the fact that the elements a′⊗x and y⊗b′ generate E′ and F′ respectively. To prove its existence, consider the mapping
m:(a′,x,y,b′)→a′.u(Φ(x,y)).b′
from A′×E×F×B′ into G; it is obviously Z-multilinear, and it satisfies
m(a′,ax,y,b′)=m(a′h(a),x,y,b′)
and
m(a′,x,yb,b′)=m(a′,x,y,h′(b)b′)
(a∈A,b∈B,a′∈A′,b′∈B′,x∈E,y∈F).
There therefore exists a Z-bilinear mapping Φ′ from E′×F′ into G′ satisfying (13) (Chap. III, 2nd ed., App. II, No. 1, prop. 2). This relation and the definition of the module structures of E′ and F′ by (12) show that Φ′ is bilinear, which completes the proof.
The hypotheses and notations being those of Proposition 1, let us now study the associated linear mappings of Φ and Φ′ (No. 1, def. 2). For this purpose we shall first define a canonical homomorphism from LA(E,G) into LA′(E′,G′). For every ν∈LA(E,G) the mapping (a′,x)→a′.u(ν(x)) from A′×E into G′ is Z-bilinear, and, viewed (11), maps (a′h(a),x) and (a′,ax)(a∈A) onto the same element of G′; it therefore defines (Chap. III, 2nd ed.,
App. II, Nos. 1 and 10) a mapping k(ν) from E′=A′⊗AE into G′ such that k(ν)(a′⊗x)=a′.u(ν(x)), and which, viewed (12), is A′-linear. Moreover one immediately deduces from (12) that the mapping ν→k(ν) from LA(E,G) into LA′(E′,G′) satisfies k(νb)=k(ν)h′(b) for every b∈B. Let i denote the canonical mapping y→y⊗1 from F into F′. Then the diagram
F∣iF′dΦdΦ′LA(E,G)∣kLA′(E′,G′)
(where dΦ and dΦ′ denote the right associated linear mappings to Φ and Φ′) is commutative. Indeed, for x∈E,y∈F and a′∈A′, we have dΦ′(i(y))(a′⊗x)=Φ′(a′⊗x,y⊗1)=a′.u(Φ(x,y))=a′.u(dΦ(y)(x)), that is, dΦ′(i(y))(a′⊗x)=k(dΦ(y))(a′⊗x). There is an analogous commutation relation for the left associated linear mappings sΦ and sΦ′ to Φ and Φ′.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.