Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0DIX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DIX].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 1. Formes sesquilinéaires

Let EE be a left AA-module and FF a right BB-module; put E′=A′⊗AEE' = A' \otimes_A E and F′=F⊗BB′F' = F \otimes_B B'. For every bilinear mapping Φ\Phi of E×FE \times F into GG, there exists one and only one bilinear mapping Φ′\Phi' of E′×F′E' \times F' into G′G' such that

Φ′(a′⊗x,y⊗b′)=a′.u(Φ(x,y)).b′ \Phi'(a' \otimes x, y \otimes b') = a'.u(\Phi(x, y)).b'

whatever a′∈A′a' \in A', b′∈B′b' \in B', x∈Ex \in E, y∈Fy \in F.

The uniqueness of Φ′\Phi' follows from the fact that the elements a′⊗xa' \otimes x and y⊗b′y \otimes b' generate E′E' and F′F' respectively. To prove its existence, consider the mapping

m:(a′,x,y,b′)→a′.u(Φ(x,y)).b′ m : (a', x, y, b') \to a'.u(\Phi(x, y)).b'

from A′×E×F×B′A' \times E \times F \times B' into GG; it is obviously Z\mathbf{Z}-multilinear, and it satisfies

m(a′,ax,y,b′)=m(a′h(a),x,y,b′) m(a', ax, y, b') = m(a'h(a), x, y, b')
and
m(a′,x,yb,b′)=m(a′,x,y,h′(b)b′) m(a', x, yb, b') = m(a', x, y, h'(b)b')
(a∈A,b∈B,a′∈A′,b′∈B′,x∈E,y∈F)(a \in A, b \in B, a' \in A', b' \in B', x \in E, y \in F).

There therefore exists a Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear mapping Φ′\Phi' from E′×F′E' \times F' into G′G' satisfying (13) (Chap. III, 2nd ed., App. II, No. 1, prop. 2). This relation and the definition of the module structures of E′E' and F′F' by (12) show that Φ′\Phi' is bilinear, which completes the proof.

The hypotheses and notations being those of Proposition 1, let us now study the associated linear mappings of Φ\Phi and Φ′\Phi' (No. 1, def. 2). For this purpose we shall first define a canonical homomorphism from LA(E,G)\mathscr{L}_A(E, G) into LA′(E′,G′)\mathscr{L}_{A'}(E', G'). For every ν∈LA(E,G)\nu \in \mathscr{L}_A(E, G) the mapping (a′,x)→a′.u(ν(x))(a', x) \to a'.u(\nu(x)) from A′×EA' \times E into G′G' is Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear, and, viewed (11), maps (a′h(a),x)(a'h(a), x) and (a′,ax)(a', ax) (a∈A)(a \in A) onto the same element of G′G'; it therefore defines (Chap. III, 2nd ed.,

App. II, Nos. 1 and 10) a mapping k(ν)k(\nu) from E′=A′⊗AEE' = A' \otimes_A E into G′G' such that k(ν)(a′⊗x)=a′.u(ν(x))k(\nu)(a' \otimes x) = a'.u(\nu(x)), and which, viewed (12), is A′A'-linear. Moreover one immediately deduces from (12) that the mapping ν→k(ν)\nu \to k(\nu) from LA(E,G)\mathscr{L}_A(E, G) into LA′(E′,G′)\mathscr{L}_{A'}(E', G') satisfies k(νb)=k(ν)h′(b)k(\nu b) = k(\nu)h'(b) for every b∈Bb \in B. Let ii denote the canonical mapping y→y⊗1y \to y \otimes 1 from FF into F′F'. Then the diagram

F→dΦLA(E,G)∣i∣kF′→dΦ′LA′(E′,G′) \begin{array}{ccc} F & \xrightarrow{d_\Phi} & \mathscr{L}_A(E, G) \\ |_i & & |_k \\ F' & \xrightarrow{d_{\Phi'}} & \mathscr{L}_{A'}(E', G') \end{array}

(where dΦd_\Phi and dΦ′d_{\Phi'} denote the right associated linear mappings to Φ\Phi and Φ′\Phi') is commutative. Indeed, for x∈E,y∈Fx \in E, y \in F and a′∈A′a' \in A', we have dΦ′(i(y))(a′⊗x)=Φ′(a′⊗x,y⊗1)=a′.u(Φ(x,y))=a′.u(dΦ(y)(x))d_{\Phi'}(i(y))(a' \otimes x) = \Phi'(a' \otimes x, y \otimes 1) = a'.u(\Phi(x, y)) = a'.u(d_\Phi(y)(x)), that is, dΦ′(i(y))(a′⊗x)=k(dΦ(y))(a′⊗x)d_{\Phi'}(i(y))(a' \otimes x) = k(d_\Phi(y))(a' \otimes x). There is an analogous commutation relation for the left associated linear mappings sΦs_\Phi and sΦ′s_{\Phi'} to Φ\Phi and Φ′\Phi'.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.