Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0DLR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DLR].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 6. Propriétés spéciales aux formes hermitiennes

Suppose the vector space E\mathbf{E} to be of finite dimension n. The orthogonal group O(Q)\mathbf{O}(Q) associated with QQ is then generated by the symmetries with respect to the non-isotropic hyperplanes of E\mathbf{E}.

The proposition being obvious for n=0n = 0, we reason by induction on nn. Let uu be an orthogonal transformation of EE, and let xx be a non-isotropic vector of EE (Lemma 1); distinguish three cases:

a) First suppose that u(x)=xu(x) = x. Then the hyperplane HH orthogonal to xx is non-isotropic, and we have u(H)=Hu(H) = H. The restriction u′u' of uu to HH therefore belongs to the orthogonal group O(Q′)O(Q') associated with the restriction Q′Q' of QQ to HH. The induction hypothesis entails, since Q′Q' is non-degenerate, that we have u′=v1′…vm′u' = v_1' \ldots v_m', where vi′v_i' is a symmetry with respect to a hyperplane LiL_i of HH. The endomorphism viv_i of EE which extends vi′v_i' and is such that vi(x)=xv_i(x) = x is then the symmetry with respect to the hyperplane Ax+LiAx + L_i of EE. Obviously u=v1v2…vmu = v_1 v_2 \ldots v_m.

b) In the second place, suppose that u(x)=−xu(x) = -x. If ss denotes the symmetry with respect to the hyperplane HH orthogonal to xx, and if we put v=suv = su, we have v(x)=xv(x) = x, and we are reduced to case a).

c) Finally, let us pass to the general case, and put y=u(x)y = u(x), so that Q(y)=Q(x)Q(y) = Q(x). Under these conditions, the vectors x−yx - y and x+yx + y cannot both be isotropic, for, from the relations Q(x−y)=0Q(x - y) = 0 and Q(x+y)=0Q(x + y) = 0, we would deduce, on adding member to member, 2(Q(x)+Q(y))=02(Q(x) + Q(y)) = 0 (§3§ 3, no 4, déf. 2), whence 4Q(x)=04Q(x) = 0, contrary to the assumption. Suppose, for example, that a=x−ya = x - y is not isotropic; we then have

Φ(y,a)=Q(y+a)−Q(y)−Q(a)=Q(x)−Q(y)−Q(a)=−Q(a); \Phi(y, a) = Q(y + a) - Q(y) - Q(a) = Q(x) - Q(y) - Q(a) = -Q(a);

consequently, if ss denotes the symmetry with respect to the hyperplane orthogonal to aa, formula (6) proves that s(y)=y+a=xs(y) = y + a = x; on putting v=suv = su, we have v(x)=xv(x) = x, and we are reduced to case a). If a=x−ya = x - y is isotropic and b=x+yb = x + y is not isotropic, we see analogously that we are reduced to case b).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.