Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0DO8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DO8].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 10. Angles

The homomorphism u→u/u‾=u2/N(u)u \to u/\overline{u} = u^2 / N(u) of S+S^+ into itself has HH as kernel, and defines, by passing to the quotient, an isomorphism of S+/HS^+/H onto O+O^+.

In fact the relation u/u‾=1u/\overline{u} = 1 is equivalent to u=u‾u = \overline{u}, that is to say to u∈A∗=Hu \in A^* = H; hence HH is the kernel of u→u/u‾u \to u/\overline{u}. Since N(u/u‾)=1N(u/\overline{u}) = 1, u/u‾u/\overline{u} is a rotation (Remark 1). It remains to prove that every element φ\varphi of O+O^+ is of the form u/u‾u/\overline{u} (u∈S+u \in S^+). If 1+φ1 + \varphi is invertible, one may take u=1+φu = 1 + \varphi, since the relation N(φ)=φφ‾=1N(\varphi) = \varphi \overline{\varphi} = 1 implies 1+φ=φ(1+φ‾)1 + \varphi = \varphi(1 + \overline{\varphi}). Otherwise, one has N(1+φ)=(1+φ)(1+φ‾)=0N(1 + \varphi) = (1 + \varphi)(1 + \overline{\varphi}) = 0, that is to say, on putting φ=a+bω\varphi = a + b\omega (a∈A, b∈A, ω2=δ∈Aa \in A,\ b \in A,\ \omega^2 = \delta \in A), 2(1+a)=02(1 + a) = 0, whence a=−1a = -1; now the relations a=−1a = -1 and N(φ)=a2−δb2=1N(\varphi) = a^2 - \delta b^2 = 1 imply b=0b = 0, whence φ=−1\varphi = -1; since ω‾=−ω\overline{\omega} = -\omega, it is enough, in this case, to take u=ωu = \omega.

When A(Φ)A(\Phi) is a field, Proposition 3 is a particular case of Hilbert's theorem (Chapter V, § 11, No. 5, Theorem 3).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.