Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0DON, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DON].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 10. Angles

Let uu be a direct similitude of EE; all the bivectors of the form x∧u(x)x \wedge u(x) belong to the same closed half-line of ∧2E\overset{2}{\wedge} E.

The case where uu is a homothety is trivial. In the contrary case one has x∧u(x)≠0x \wedge u(x) \neq 0 for all x≠0x \neq 0; let x,yx, y be two vectors of EE (x≠0,y≠0x \neq 0, y \neq 0); there exists φ∈S+\varphi \in S^+ such that y=φ(x)y = \varphi(x), whence y∧u(y)=φ(x)∧uφ(x)=φ(x)∧φ(u(x))=(det⁡φ)(x∧u(x))y \wedge u(y) = \varphi(x) \wedge u \varphi(x) = \varphi(x) \wedge \varphi(u(x)) = (\det \varphi)(x \wedge u(x)); taking an orthonormal basis of EE, one sees that det⁡φ\det \varphi is positive (Proposition 1 b)); whence our assertion.

This being so, among the two generators ω\omega of A(Φ)\mathbf{A}(\Phi) such that ω2=−1\omega^2 = -1, there exists one and only one such that the bivector x∧ω(x)x \wedge \omega(x) is positive for all x∈Ex \in E. It is this generator that we shall choose in order to define the functions cw,swc_w, s_w and twt_w (No. 2). Let hh and h′h' be the canonical bijections defined above from the group A0\mathfrak{A}_0 of angles of lines onto S+/HS^+/H and from the group A\mathfrak{A} of angles of half-lines onto O+O^+. The composite mappings tw∘ht_w \circ h of A0\mathfrak{A}_0 into the projective field A~\tilde{\mathfrak{A}}, cw∘h′c_w \circ h' and sw∘h′s_w \circ h' of A\mathfrak{A} into the field AA are denoted respectively by tg⁡\operatorname{tg}, cos⁡\cos and sin⁡\sin, and are called the tangent, cosine and sine functions. The mapping φ→1/tg⁡φ\varphi \to 1/\operatorname{tg} \varphi of A0\mathfrak{A}_0 into A~\tilde{\mathfrak{A}} is denoted by cotg⁡\operatorname{cotg} and is called the cotangent function. One says that the sine, tangent and cotangent functions are the trigonometric functions. The composite mappings tg⁡∘p\operatorname{tg} \circ p and cotg⁡∘p\operatorname{cotg} \circ p, where pp denotes the canonical homomorphism of A\mathfrak{A} onto A0\mathfrak{A}_0 (Remark 2 above), are again denoted by tg⁡\operatorname{tg} and cotg⁡\operatorname{cotg} by abuse of language.

Formulas (2), (8), (3), (4), (5) and (7) of No. 2 give, since one has here δ=−1\delta = -1

(11)tg⁡(φ+φ′)=(tg⁡φ+tg⁡φ′)/(1−tg⁡φtg⁡φ′)(12)tg⁡(2φ)=2tg⁡φ/(1−tg⁡2φ) \begin{align*} (11) \quad & \operatorname{tg} (\varphi + \varphi') = (\operatorname{tg} \varphi + \operatorname{tg} \varphi')/(1 - \operatorname{tg} \varphi \operatorname{tg} \varphi') \\ (12) \quad & \operatorname{tg} (2\varphi) = 2 \operatorname{tg} \varphi/(1 - \operatorname{tg}^2 \varphi) \end{align*}

for φ,φ′\varphi, \varphi' in A0\mathfrak{A}_0;

(13)cos⁡2θ+sin⁡2θ=1(14)cos⁡(θ+θ′)=cos⁡θcos⁡θ′−sin⁡θsin⁡θ′(15)sin⁡(θ+θ′)=sin⁡θcos⁡θ′+cos⁡θsin⁡θ′(16){sin⁡(2θ)=2tg⁡θ/(1+tg⁡2θ),cos⁡(2θ)=(1−tg⁡2θ)/(1+tg⁡2θ) \begin{align*} (13) \quad & \cos^2 \theta + \sin^2 \theta = 1 \\ (14) \quad & \cos (\theta + \theta') = \cos \theta \cos \theta' - \sin \theta \sin \theta' \\ (15) \quad & \sin (\theta + \theta') = \sin \theta \cos \theta' + \cos \theta \sin \theta' \\ (16) \quad & \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \sin (2\theta) = 2 \operatorname{tg} \theta/(1 + \operatorname{tg}^2 \theta), \\ \cos (2\theta) = (1 - \operatorname{tg}^2 \theta)/(1 + \operatorname{tg}^2 \theta) \end{array} \right. \end{align*}

for θ,θ′\theta, \theta' in A\mathfrak{A}. On the other hand one has, by definition or as an easy consequence of the preceding formulas:

(17)tg⁡θ=sin⁡θ/cos⁡θ,cotg⁡θ=cos⁡θ/sin⁡θ(18)1+tg⁡2θ=1/cos⁡2θ,1+cotg⁡2θ=1/sin⁡2θ \begin{align*} (17) \quad & \operatorname{tg} \theta = \sin \theta/\cos \theta, \qquad \operatorname{cotg} \theta = \cos \theta/\sin \theta \\ (18) \quad & 1 + \operatorname{tg}^2 \theta = 1/\cos^2 \theta, \qquad 1 + \operatorname{cotg}^2 \theta = 1/\sin^2 \theta \end{align*}

for θ∈A\theta \in \mathfrak{A}.

Given two non-zero vectors x,yx, y of EE, the angle of these two vectors (taken in this order) is defined to be, and is denoted by (x,y)^\widehat{(x, y)}, the angle of the half-lines to which they belong. For every vector xx of EE the length of xx is defined to be, and is denoted by ∣x∣|x|, the element Φ(x,x)1/2\Phi(x, x)^{1/2} of AA.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.