Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (D. Lazard)

Tag 0DPJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DPJ].

Algebra, chapter X, § 1. Compléments d’algèbre linéaire

For every A-module E, the following conditions are equivalent: (i) E is flat. (ii) For every A-module P of finite presentation, the canonical homomorphism

Hom⁡A(P,A)⊗AE→Hom⁡A(P,E) \operatorname{Hom}_A(P, A) \otimes_A E \to \operatorname{Hom}_A(P, E)
is surjective. (iii) For every A-module P of finite presentation and every homomorphism u:P→Eu : P \to E, there exists a free A-module L of finite type and homomorphisms v:P→Lv : P \to L and w:L→Ew : L \to E such that u=w∘vu = w \circ v. (iv) There exists a filtered ordered set J, an inductive system of free modules of finite type (Lj)j∈J(L_j)_{j \in J} and an isomorphism of E onto lim⁡Lj→\lim \overrightarrow{L_j}. (iv) ⇒\Rightarrow (i) : this follows from prop. 4 (ii) of X, p. 8. (i) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii) : this follows from prop. 8b) of X, p. 12. (ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii) : let P be a A-module of finite presentation and u:P→Eu : P \to E a homomorphism; by (ii), there exist v1,…,vn∈Hom⁡A(P,A)v_1, \ldots, v_n \in \operatorname{Hom}_A(P, A), w1,…,wn∈Ew_1, \ldots, w_n \in E such that u(x)=∑vi(x)wiu(x) = \sum v_i(x) w_i for every x∈Px \in P; if v:P→Anv : P \to A^n is the homomorphism of components (vi)(v_i) and w:An→Ew : A^n \to E the homomorphism (ai)↦∑aiwi(a_i) \mapsto \sum a_i w_i, we indeed have u=w∘vu = w \circ v. (iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iv) : suppose (iii) is verified, and let (Eα,φβ,α)(E_\alpha, \varphi_{\beta, \alpha}) be an inductive system, relative to a filtered set I, of A-modules of finite presentation, with inductive limit E

(X, p. 11, prop. 7). Replacing I by the lexicographic product I × N, with E_{(α,n)} = E_α for every n, we may suppose that I has no greatest element. For each α ∈ I, let L_α be a free A-module of finite type and let u_α : E_α → L_α, v'_α : L_α → E be homomorphisms such that v'_α ∘ u_α is the canonical mapping φ_α of E_α into E; since L_α is free of finite type and I has no greatest element, there exists an index β > α and a homomorphism v''_α : L_α → E_β such that v'_α = φ_β ∘ v''_α; since φ_β ∘ v''_α ∘ u_α = φ_β ∘ φ_β,α and E_α is of finite presentation, it follows from prop. 8a) of X, p. 12, that there exists γ ≥ β such that φ_{γβ} ∘ v''_α ∘ u_α = φ_{γβ} ∘ φ_{βα} = φ_{γα} ; let γ = f(α) and let v_α be the homomorphism φ_{γβ} ∘ v''_α from L_α into E_{f(α)} ; we have v_α ∘ u_α = φ_{f(α),α}. We can then apply lemma 2, whence (iv).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.