Theorem 3
Tag 0DQG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DQG].
Algebra, chapter X, § 1. Compléments d’algèbre linéaire
Let I be an injective A-module.
a) If I is the injective envelope of a noetherian A-module M, I is direct sum of a finite family of indecomposable (injective) submodules.
b) If A is left noetherian, I is direct sum of a family of indecomposable (injective) submodules.
c) If I is direct sum of indecomposable (injective) submodules, there exists one and only one family of cardinals , such that I is isomorphic to
Let us first note that c) follows from prop. 14 (X, p. 21) and from VIII, § 1, No. 7, theorem 2. Let us prove a).
Let N be a submodule of M whose injective envelopes are direct sum of a finite family of indecomposable submodules, and maximal for this property (there exists one since M is noetherian). According to remark 2 (X, p. 21), there exists a submodule I₁ of I which is an injective envelope of N. If I₁ = I, the proof is complete; otherwise, let be a direct factor complement of in . Then is the injective envelope of the noetherian module (loc. cit.), hence possesses a nonzero indecomposable injective submodule (lemma 4). Then is injective, direct sum of a finite family of indecomposable submodules, and the injective envelope of the submodule of which strictly majorizes , whence a contradiction.
Suppose is left noetherian and let us prove b). Let be the set sum of the sets for . To each subset of associate an -module and an -homomorphism in the following way: is the sum of a family where , one sets
and the component of on the direct factor of corresponding to the element of is . Let be a subset of , such that is injective and that is maximal for this property (such a subset exists according to E, III, p. 20); it suffices to prove that is bijective. Otherwise, let be a direct factor complement of the injective submodule of ; since is nonzero, it possesses a nonzero noetherian submodule (because A is supposed noetherian), hence also a nonzero injective submodule which is the injective envelope of a noetherian module. According to a), is direct sum of a finite nonempty family of indecomposable submodules. There therefore exists a finite nonempty subset of such that maps bijectively onto . Since , one has and is injective; this contradicts the maximal character of and completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.