Definition 1
Tag 0DRD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DRD].
Algebra, chapter X, § 2. Complexes de A-modules
A differential complex of -modules is a pair formed by a graded -module and an endomorphism graded of descending degree and such that .
It is also called a complex of -modules, or an -complex, or a complex. One often writes C in place of (C, d); the endomorphism d is called the differential of the complex (C, d), or by abuse of language of C.
If C_n (resp. C^n) is the homogeneous component of descending degree (resp. ascending degree) n of C, the datum of d is equivalent to that of the sequence of homomorphisms
(1)
(1')
One will remark, as a mnemonic device, that when one “follows the direction of the arrows” in the diagrams (1) and (1’), the descending degree decreases and the ascending degree increases.
Every graded -module will tacitly be considered as a complex by endowing it with the zero differential; the complexes thus obtained will be called complexes with zero differential. In particular, every -module M will be endowed with the unique structure of -complex such that . The complex (C, d) is said to be zero if C is reduced to 0. In the sequel, we denote by 0 a zero complex, chosen once and for all.
Adjoin to the ordered set two elements denoted and ; denote by the set obtained, and endow it with the order relation extending that of and such that for all ; every subset of possesses a greatest lower bound and a greatest upper bound.
Let C be a complex; one calls the right and left bounds of C the elements and of defined by
The words right and left are relative to the description of C by means of the diagrams (1) and (1’). One must not confuse the notion of length of the complex (C, d) with that of length of the module C (II, p. 21).
is not bounded, . \* With the conventions of TG, IV, p. 13-17, one always has . \*
For example, if consecutive components of are non-zero, the others being zero, one has if , if .
One says that the complex is free, projective, flat, injective, if each of the modules is so. It will be noted that the complex is projective or flat if and only if the module is so (II, p. 39, prop. 3 and X, p. 8, prop. 4), but that can be free without the complex being so (since a direct factor of a free module is not always free), analogously can be injective without being so (X, p. 170, exercise 21).
Let be a complex. Put , ; these are graded submodules of , called respectively the module of cycles and the module of boundaries of ; the homogeneous components of and are denoted , ; one has , , , .
Since , one has ; two cycles are said to be homologous if their difference is a boundary; the graded quotient module is called the homology module of ; its elements are the homology classes; its homogeneous components are denoted .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.