The image φ(Γ) of Γ in H(C′′)×H(C′) is the graph of a graded A-homomorphism of degree −1 from H(C′′) into H(C′).
a) If x∈Γ and if v(x)∈B(C′′), then uˉ−1(dx)∈B(C′) : there exists indeed z′′∈C′′ such that v(x)=dz′′, then z∈C such that z′′=v(z), hence v(x)=v(dz), then t′∈C′ such that x−dz=u(t′), which gives dx=u(dt′), hence uˉ−1(dx)=dt′∈B(C′).
b) Every element of Z(C′′) is the image by v of an element x of C such that v(dx)=0, i.e. dx∈Imu, that is to say such that x∈Γ.
c) It follows from a) and b) that φ(Γ) is indeed a functional graph; since φ is bihomogeneous of bidegree (0,−1), this completes the proof.
The graded homomorphism of degree −1 from H(C′′) into H(C′) thus defined is called the connecting homomorphism relative to the exact sequence (u,v); it is denoted by ∂(u,v) or ∂u,v or simply ∂. Its homogeneous components are denoted
By definition, to construct the image of a class α∈Hn(C′′) by ∂, one chooses a cycle z′′∈Zn(C′′) in the class α, then an element x of Cn such that v(x)=z′′; then dx is of the form u(t′), t′∈Cn−1′, and ∂(α) is the homology class of t′.
In terms of correspondences, ∂n(u,v) is therefore obtained from the correspondence uˉn−1−1∘dn∘vˉn−1 between Cn′′ and Cn−1′, by passing to the subsets Zn(C′′) and Zn−1(C′), then to their quotients Hn(C′′) and Hn−1(C′). This shows in particular that, if one replaces C,C′,C′′,u,v by C(p),C′(p),C′′(p),u(p),v(p), one has
∂(u(p),v(p))=(−1)p∂(u,v);
analogously, if λ and μ are two invertible elements of the center of A, one has
∂(λu,μv)=λ−1μ−1∂(u,v).
One can also relate ∂(u,v) to the snake diagram (X, p. 4). According to loc. cit., prop. 2, the sequences
0⟶Zn(C′)Zn(u)Zn(C)Zn(v)Zn(C′′)
and
Cn′/Bn(C′)unCn/Bn(C)vnCn′′/Bn(C′′)⟶0,
where un and vn are deduced from u and v, are exact. Using the canonical exact sequences (Vn), one obtains a commutative diagram with exact rows and columns
The homomorphism Hn(C′′)→Hn−1(C′) associated with this diagram (loc. cit., prop. 2, (iii)) coincides by construction with ∂n(u,v). This furthermore implies that the sequence of homomorphisms (Hn(u),Hn(v),∂n(u,v),Hn−1(u),Hn−1(v)) is exact; consequently:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.