Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0DRI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DRI].

Algebra, chapter X, § 2. Complexes de A-modules

The image φ(Γ)\varphi(\Gamma) of Γ\Gamma in H(C′′)×H(C′)H(C'') \times H(C') is the graph of a graded A-homomorphism of degree −1-1 from H(C′′)H(C'') into H(C′)H(C').

a) If x∈Γx \in \Gamma and if v(x)∈B(C′′)v(x) \in B(C''), then uˉ−1(dx)∈B(C′)\bar{u}^{-1}(dx) \in B(C') : there exists indeed z′′∈C′′z'' \in C'' such that v(x)=dz′′v(x) = dz'', then z∈Cz \in C such that z′′=v(z)z'' = v(z), hence v(x)=v(dz)v(x) = v(dz), then t′∈C′t' \in C' such that x−dz=u(t′)x - dz = u(t'), which gives dx=u(dt′)dx = u(dt'), hence uˉ−1(dx)=dt′∈B(C′)\bar{u}^{-1}(dx) = dt' \in B(C').

b) Every element of Z(C′′)Z(C'') is the image by vv of an element xx of CC such that v(dx)=0v(dx) = 0, i.e. dx∈Im⁡udx \in \operatorname{Im} u, that is to say such that x∈Γx \in \Gamma.

c) It follows from a) and b) that φ(Γ)\varphi(\Gamma) is indeed a functional graph; since φ\varphi is bihomogeneous of bidegree (0,−1)(0, -1), this completes the proof.

The graded homomorphism of degree −1-1 from H(C′′)H(C'') into H(C′)H(C') thus defined is called the connecting homomorphism relative to the exact sequence (u,v)(u, v); it is denoted by ∂(u,v)\partial(u, v) or ∂u,v\partial_{u,v} or simply ∂\partial. Its homogeneous components are denoted

∂n(u,v):Hn(C′′)→Hn−1(C′)and∂n(u,v):Hn(C′′)→Hn+1(C′). \partial_n(u, v) : H_n(C'') \to H_{n-1}(C') \quad \text{and} \quad \partial^n(u, v) : H^n(C'') \to H^{n+1}(C') .

By definition, to construct the image of a class α∈Hn(C′′)\alpha \in H_n(C'') by ∂\partial, one chooses a cycle z′′∈Zn(C′′)z'' \in Z_n(C'') in the class α\alpha, then an element xx of CnC_n such that v(x)=z′′v(x) = z''; then dxdx is of the form u(t′)u(t'), t′∈Cn−1′t' \in C'_{n-1}, and ∂(α)\partial(\alpha) is the homology class of t′t'.

In terms of correspondences, ∂n(u,v)\partial_n(u, v) is therefore obtained from the correspondence uˉn−1−1∘dn∘vˉn−1\bar{u}_{n-1}^{-1} \circ d_n \circ \bar{v}_n^{-1} between Cn′′C''_n and Cn−1′C'_{n-1}, by passing to the subsets Zn(C′′)Z_n(C'') and Zn−1(C′)Z_{n-1}(C'), then to their quotients Hn(C′′)H_n(C'') and Hn−1(C′)H_{n-1}(C'). This shows in particular that, if one replaces C,C′,C′′,u,vC, C', C'', u, v by C(p),C′(p),C′′(p),u(p),v(p)C(p), C'(p), C''(p), u(p), v(p), one has

∂(u(p),v(p))=(−1)p∂(u,v); \partial(u(p), v(p)) = (-1)^p \partial(u, v) ;
analogously, if λ\lambda and μ\mu are two invertible elements of the center of AA, one has
∂(λu,μv)=λ−1μ−1∂(u,v). \partial(\lambda u, \mu v) = \lambda^{-1} \mu^{-1} \partial(u, v) .

One can also relate ∂(u,v)\partial(u, v) to the snake diagram (X, p. 4). According to loc. cit., prop. 2, the sequences

0⟶Zn(C′)→Zn(u)Zn(C)→Zn(v)Zn(C′′) 0 \longrightarrow Z_n(C') \xrightarrow{Z_n(u)} Z_n(C) \xrightarrow{Z_n(v)} Z_n(C'')

and

Cn′/Bn(C′)→u‾nCn/Bn(C)→v‾nCn′′/Bn(C′′)⟶0, C'_n/B_n(C') \xrightarrow{\overline{u}_n} C_n/B_n(C) \xrightarrow{\overline{v}_n} C''_n/B_n(C'') \longrightarrow 0 ,

where u‾n\overline{u}_n and v‾n\overline{v}_n are deduced from uu and vv, are exact. Using the canonical exact sequences (Vn)(V_n), one obtains a commutative diagram with exact rows and columns

000↓↓↓Hn(C′)→Hn(u)Hn(C)→Hn(v)Hn(C′′)↓↓↓0⟶Cn′/Bn(C′)→u‾nCn/Bn(C)→v‾nCn′′/Bn(C′′)⟶0↓↓↓0⟶Zn−1(C′)→Zn−1(u)Zn−1(C)→Zn−1(v)Zn−1(C′′)↓↓↓Hn−1(C′)→Hn−1(u)Hn−1(C)→Hn−1(v)Hn−1(C′′)↓↓↓000 \begin{array}{ccccccccc} &&0&&0&&0&&\\ &&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\\ &&H_n(C')&\xrightarrow{H_n(u)}&H_n(C)&\xrightarrow{H_n(v)}&H_n(C'')&&\\ &&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\\ 0&\longrightarrow&C'_n/B_n(C')&\xrightarrow{\overline{u}_n}&C_n/B_n(C)&\xrightarrow{\overline{v}_n}&C''_n/B_n(C'')&\longrightarrow&0\\ &&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\\ 0&\longrightarrow&Z_{n-1}(C')&\xrightarrow{Z_{n-1}(u)}&Z_{n-1}(C)&\xrightarrow{Z_{n-1}(v)}&Z_{n-1}(C'')&&\\ &&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\\ &&H_{n-1}(C')&\xrightarrow{H_{n-1}(u)}&H_{n-1}(C)&\xrightarrow{H_{n-1}(v)}&H_{n-1}(C'')&&\\ &&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\downarrow&&\\ &&0&&0&&0&& \end{array}

The homomorphism Hn(C′′)→Hn−1(C′)H_n(C'')\to H_{n-1}(C') associated with this diagram (loc. cit., prop. 2, (iii)) coincides by construction with ∂n(u,v).\partial_n(u,v). This furthermore implies that the sequence of homomorphisms (Hn(u), Hn(v), ∂n(u,v), Hn−1(u), Hn−1(v))(H_n(u),\ H_n(v),\ \partial_n(u,v),\ H_{n-1}(u),\ H_{n-1}(v)) is exact; consequently:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.