Bourbaki

Example

Tag 0DRN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DRN].

Algebra, chapter X, § 2. Complexes de A-modules

Let CC be a complex. Consider the canonical exact sequence

(I)

0⟶Z(C)→jC→δB(C)(−1)⟶0, 0 \longrightarrow Z(C) \xrightarrow{j} C \xrightarrow{\delta} B(C) (-1) \longrightarrow 0 ,
and let i:B(C)→Z(C)i : B(C) \to Z(C) be the canonical injection. Then the linking homomorphism ∂(j,δ):H(B(C))(−1)→H(Z(C))(−1)\partial(j, \delta) : \mathrm{H}(B(C)) (-1) \to \mathrm{H}(Z(C)) (-1) identifies with H(i)(−1)\mathrm{H}(i) (-1), as one verifies at once. Since H(δ)=0\mathrm{H}(\delta) = 0, the homology exact sequence associated to (I) decomposes into the short exact sequences

(II_n)

0⟶Bn(C)→iZn(C)→H(j)Hn(C)⟶0. 0 \longrightarrow B_n(C) \xrightarrow{i} Z_n(C) \xrightarrow{\mathrm{H}(j)} H_n(C) \longrightarrow 0 .

\* Mappings :

1) Singular homology

Let AA be a ring. For any topological space XX, we define the singular complex C(X,A)C(X, A) of XX with coefficients in AA as follows:

In R(N)\mathbf{R}^{(N)}, denote by (en)(e_n) the canonical basis; we call the nn-canonical simplex the convex hull Δn\Delta_n of {e0,...,en}\{ e_0, ..., e_n \}. For i∈{0,...,n}i \in \{ 0, ..., n \}, we define the affine mapping ιi:Δn−1→Δn\iota_i : \Delta_{n-1} \to \Delta_n by ιi(ek)=ek\iota_i(e_k) = e_k for k<ik < i and ιi(ek)=ek+1\iota_i(e_k) = e_{k+1} for k≥ik \geq i. We denote Cn(X,A)C_n(X, A) the a-module A(Σn(X))A^{(\Sigma_n(X))}, where Σn(X)\Sigma_n(X) is the set of continuous mappings from Δn\Delta_n into XX; for n<0n < 0, we set Cn=0C_n = 0. For i∈{0,...,n}i \in \{ 0, ..., n \}, we define the linear mapping ∂n,i:Cn(X,A)→Cn−1(X,A)\partial_{n, i} : C_n(X, A) \to C_{n-1}(X, A) by ∂n,i(es)=es∘ιi\partial_{n, i}(e_s) = e_{s \circ \iota_i} for s∈Σn(X)s \in \Sigma_n(X), and we set dn=Σ(−1)i∂n,id_n = \Sigma (-1)^i \partial_{n, i}. We verify that

...Cn(X,A)→dnCn−1(X,A)→... ... C_n(X, A) \xrightarrow{d_n} C_{n-1}(X, A) \to ...

is a complex. Its homology is called the singular homology of XX with coefficients in AA and is denoted H(X,A)\mathrm{H}(X, A) or simply H(X)\mathrm{H}(X).

If YY is a subspace of XX, we denote C(X,Y,A)C(X, Y, A) the quotient complex C(X,A)/C(Y,A)C(X, A)/C(Y, A), and H(X,Y,A)\mathrm{H}(X, Y, A) its homology. It follows from Theorem 1 that there is an exact sequence:

...→Hn(Y,A)→Hn(X,A)→Hn(X,Y,A)→Hn−1(Y,A)→Hn−1(X,A)→... ... \to \mathrm{H}_n(Y, A) \to \mathrm{H}_n(X, A) \to \mathrm{H}_n(X, Y, A) \to \mathrm{H}_{n-1}(Y, A) \to \mathrm{H}_{n-1}(X, A) \to ...

2) Finite cell complexes

Let XX be a separated topological space. A finite cell decomposition of XX is given by an increasing sequence (Xn)n∈Z(X_n)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} of closed subspaces of XX satisfying the following conditions: (i) Xn=∅X_n = \varnothing for n<0n < 0; (ii) there exists an NN such that XN=XX_N = X (hence Xn=XX_n = X for n>Nn > N); (iii) for every nn, the space Xn−Xn−1X_n - X_{n-1} has only a finite number of connected components, called the nn-dimensional cells; (iv) for every nn, and for every connected component CC of Xn−Xn−1X_n - X_{n-1}, there exists a homeomorphism from the open nn-dimensional euclidean ball B^n\hat{B}_n (TG, VI, p. 10) onto CC that extends to a continuous mapping of the closed ball into XX.

One can show that these conditions imply that Hn(Xn,Xn−1,A)\mathrm{H}_n(X_n, X_{n-1}, A) is a free a-module Γn\Gamma_n of rank equal to the number of nn-dimensional cells, and that Hi(Xn,Xn−1,A)=0\mathrm{H}_i(X_n, X_{n-1}, A) = 0 for i≠ni \neq n. We have C(Xn,Xn−1,A)=C(Xn,Xn−2,A)/C(Xn−1,Xn−2,A)C(X_n, X_{n-1}, A) = C(X_n, X_{n-2}, A)/C(X_{n-1}, X_{n-2}, A), hence an exact sequence

Hn(Xn,Xn−2)⟶Hn(Xn,Xn−1)→dnHn−1(Xn−1,Xn−2)⟶Hn−1(Xn,Xn−2), \mathrm{H}_n(X_n, X_{n-2}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{H}_n(X_n, X_{n-1}) \xrightarrow{d_n} \mathrm{H}_{n-1}(X_{n-1}, X_{n-2}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{H}_{n-1}(X_n, X_{n-2}) ,

involving a linking homomorphism dn:Γn→Γn−1d_n : \Gamma_n \to \Gamma_{n-1}. We have dn∘dn+1=0d_n \circ d_{n+1} = 0, which allows us to define a complex Γ:⋯→Γn→dnΓn−1→⋯\Gamma : \cdots \to \Gamma_n \xrightarrow{d_n} \Gamma_{n-1} \to \cdots.

The exact sequence

==========

(Note: The final line "The exact sequence" is left as part of the text since the source ends there.)

Hn+1(Xp,Xp−1)→Hn(Xp−1)→Hn(Xp)→Hn(Xp,Xp−1)→Hn−1(Xp−1) H_{n+1}(X_p, X_{p-1}) \to H_n(X_{p-1}) \to H_n(X_p) \to H_n(X_p, X_{p-1}) \to H_{n-1}(X_{p-1})

shows by induction on p that Hn(Xp)=0H_n(X_p) = 0 for p<np < n, that Hn(Xn)=Ker (dn:Γn→Γn−1)H_n(X_n) = \mathrm{Ker}\,(d_n : \Gamma_n \to \Gamma_{n-1}) and that Hn(Xp)=Hn(Γ)H_n(X_p) = H_n(\Gamma) for p>np > n. In particular Hn(X)H_n(X) is identified with Hn(Γ)H_n(\Gamma).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.