Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 0DRW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DRW].

Algebra, chapter X, § 2. Complexes de A-modules

Let C,C′,D,D′C, C', D, D' be four complexes, f:C→C′f : C \to C' a morphism, u:D→Cu : D \to C and v:C′→D′v : C' \to D' homotopy equivalences. For v∘f∘uv \circ f \circ u to be a homotopy equivalence (resp. a homology isomorphism), it is necessary and sufficient that ff be one.

If ff is a homotopy equivalence (resp. a homology isomorphism), then v∘f∘uv \circ f \circ u is a composition of homotopy equivalences (resp. homology isomorphisms), hence is one. Conversely, let u‾\overline{u} and v‾\overline{v} be morphisms inverse to uu and vv up to homotopy; then v‾∘(v∘f∘u)∘u‾\overline{v} \circ (v \circ f \circ u) \circ \overline{u} is homotopic to ff by prop. 4; whence the conclusion by prop. 5, and the corollary of prop. 3.

One says that the complex CC is homotopic to zero if 1C1_C is homotopic to the zero mapping, that is, if there exists a graded AA-endomorphism ss of degree 1 of CC such that 1C=s∘d+d∘s1_C = s \circ d + d \circ s. This also amounts to saying that the unique morphism 0→C0 \to C (resp. C→0C \to 0) is a homotopy equivalence. A complex homotopic to zero has zero homology (prop. 5).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.