Let u:M→N be a homomorphism of A-modules; then the only non-zero homogeneous components of Cyl(u) and Con(u) are
Cyl1(u)=M,Cyl0(u)=M⊕N, Con1(u)=M,Con0(u)=N, and we have
D(m)=(m,−u(m)),
D(m)=−u(m) for
m∈M; consequently,
H1(Con(u))=Ker(u),H0(Con(u))=Coker(u).
Let X and Y be two topological spaces and f a continuous mapping from X into Y. The cylinder of f is called the quotient space Cyl(f) of the topological sum of [0,1]×X and Y by the equivalence relation identifying the point (1,x) of [0,1]×X with the point f(x) of Y for every x∈X. The cone of f is called the quotient space Con(f) of the topological sum of a space reduced to a point s and Cyl(f) by the equivalence relation identifying s with the image of (0,x) for every x∈X: we still denote by s the image of s in Con(f).
Suppose that X and Y are endowed with cellular decompositions (Xn) and (Yn) (cf. No. 3), and suppose that f(Xn)⊂Yn for every n. We obtain a cellular decomposition (Sn) of Cyl(f) (resp. of Con(f)) by taking for Sn the image of ({0}×Xn)∪([0,1]×Xn−1)∪Yn
(resp. of {s}∪([0,1]×Xn−1)∪Yn,if n⩾0). Let
Γ(X),Γ(Y),Γ(Cyl(f)),Γ(Con(f)) denote the complexes associated with these cellular decompositions.
The complex Γ(s) associated with the space {s} endowed with its unique cellular decomposition is reduced to the module A and is identified with a subcomplex of Γ(Con(f)); let Γ(Con(f),s) denote the quotient complex. The mapping f defines a morphism of complexes Γ(f):Γ(X)→Γ(Y), and one can show that the complexes Γ(Cyl(f)) and Γ(Con(f),s) are identified respectively with Cyl(Γ(f)) and Con(Γ(f)).
Par ailleurs, et sans hypothèses sur X et Y, on associe à f un morphisme de complexes f∗:C(X,A)→C(Y,A). On peut construire des homotopismes injectifs de Cyl(f∗) dans C(Cyl(f),A) et de Con(f∗) dans C(Con(f),{s},A). Soient f~:X→Cyl(f) l'application qui à x associe l'image de (0,x), α:Y→Cyl(f) l'application canonique et β:Cyl(f)→Y l'application qui associe y à son image dans Cyl(f) pour y∈Y et f(x) à l'image de (t,x) dans Cyl(f) pour t∈[0,1] et x∈X. L'application f~ est un homéomorphisme de X sur un fermé de Cyl(f), on a β∘α=IdY, et α∘β est topologiquement homotope à l'identité de Cyl(f). Ces propriétés sont à rapprocher de la proposition 7 ci-dessous. \*
Considérons maintenant les applications A-linéaires graduées de degré 0
u~:C′α:Cβ:Cyl(u)π:Cπ~:Cyl(u)δ:Con(u)→Cyl(u),→Cyl(u),→C,→Con(u),→Con(u),→C′(−1),u~(x′)α(x)β(x′,y′,x)π(x)π~(x′,y′,x)δ(y′,x)=(x′,0,0),=(0,0,x),=u(x′)+x,=(0,x),=(y′,x),=y′.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.