Bourbaki

Example 2

Tag 0DT0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DT0].

Algebra, chapter X, § 2. Complexes de A-modules

Suppose that k=Ck = \mathbf{C} and A=C[X1,...,Xn]/(P1,...,Pr)A = \mathbf{C} [X_1, ..., X_n]/(P_1, ..., P_r), where the PiP_i are polynomials in X1,...,XnX_1, ..., X_n, such that the set of points of Cn\mathbf{C}^n where all the PiP_i vanish is an analytic subvariety VV of Cn\mathbf{C}^n. One can show that the de Rham cohomology of AA over C\mathbf{C} is isomorphic to the singular cohomology H(V,C)H(V, \mathbf{C}).

Let now MM be an AA-module and ∇0\nabla^0 a kk-linear mapping from MM into M⊗AΩA/k1M \otimes_A \Omega^1_{A/k} such that

(13)(13)
∇0(am)=a∇0(m)+m⊗dafora∈A, m∈M \nabla^0(am) = a \nabla^0(m) + m \otimes da \quad \text{for} \quad a \in A,\ m \in M
(one sometimes says that ∇0\nabla^0 is a connection on the AA-module MM).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.