Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0DWY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DWY].

Algebra, chapter X, § 5. Modules d’extensions

The mapping (f,g)↦Ext⁡A(f,g):(f,g) \mapsto \operatorname{Ext}_A(f,g) :

Hom⁡A(M′,M)×Hom⁡A(N,N′)⟶Homgr⁡k(Ext⁡A(M,N),Ext⁡A(M′,N′)) \operatorname{Hom}_A(M',M)\times\operatorname{Hom}_A(N,N')\longrightarrow \operatorname{Homgr}_k\bigl(\operatorname{Ext}_A(M,N),\operatorname{Ext}_A(M',N')\bigr)
is kk-bilinear.

Let f∈Hom⁡A(M′,M)f\in\operatorname{Hom}_A(M',M), g1,g2∈Hom⁡A(N,N′)g_1,g_2\in\operatorname{Hom}_A(N,N'), λ1,λ2∈k\lambda_1,\lambda_2\in k. The morphisms Homgr⁡A(L(f),λ1g1+λ2g2)\operatorname{Homgr}_A(L(f),\lambda_1g_1+\lambda_2g_2) and λ1Homgr⁡A(L(f),g1)+λ2Homgr⁡A(L(f),g2)\lambda_1\operatorname{Homgr}_A(L(f),g_1)+\lambda_2\operatorname{Homgr}_A(L(f),g_2) from Homgr⁡A(L(M),N)\operatorname{Homgr}_A(L(M),N) to Homgr⁡A(L(M),N′)\operatorname{Homgr}_A(L(M),N') coincide, hence, by Proposition 5 and Remark 3,

(10) Ext⁡A(f,λ1g1+λ2g2)=λ1Ext⁡A(f,g1)+λ2Ext⁡A(f,g2)\operatorname{Ext}_A(f,\lambda_1g_1+\lambda_2g_2)=\lambda_1\operatorname{Ext}_A(f,g_1)+\lambda_2\operatorname{Ext}_A(f,g_2).

Argue similarly for the mapping f↦Ext⁡A(f,g)f \mapsto \operatorname{Ext}_A(f,g).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.