The mapping (f,g)↦ExtA(f,g):
HomA(M′,M)×HomA(N,N′)⟶Homgrk(ExtA(M,N),ExtA(M′,N′)) is
k-bilinear.
Let f∈HomA(M′,M), g1,g2∈HomA(N,N′), λ1,λ2∈k. The morphisms HomgrA(L(f),λ1g1+λ2g2) and λ1HomgrA(L(f),g1)+λ2HomgrA(L(f),g2) from HomgrA(L(M),N) to HomgrA(L(M),N′) coincide, hence, by Proposition 5 and Remark 3,
(10) ExtA(f,λ1g1+λ2g2)=λ1ExtA(f,g1)+λ2ExtA(f,g2).
Argue similarly for the mapping f↦ExtA(f,g).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.