Proposition 8
Tag 0DX5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DX5].
Algebra, chapter X, § 5. Modules d’extensions
Let f:M1→M be a homomorphism of A*-modules* and
(E)(E1)00⟶⟶N′g′↓N1′uu1Ng↓N1vv1N′′g′′↓N1′′⟶⟶00
Ext(M,N′)⏐↑φM(N′)H(Homgr(L(M),N′))Ext(1,u)H(Homgr(1,u))Ext(M,N)⏐↑φM(N)H(Homgr(L(M),N))Ext(1,v)H(Homgr(1,v))Ext(M,N′′)δ(M,G)Ext(M,N′)Ext(1,u)Ext(M,N)⏐↑φM(N′′)⏐↑φM(N′)H(Homgr(L(M),N′′))∂(MG)H(Homgr(L(M),N′))H(Homgr(1,u))H(Homgr(L(M),N))
a commutative diagram of A-modules with exact rows. The diagram of k-modules
ExtA(M,N′′)Ext(f,g′′)↓ExtA(M1,N1′′)δ(M,E)δ(M,E1)ExtA(M,N′)Ext(f,g′)↓ExtA(M1,N1′)
is commutative. This follows from X, p. 31, prop. 2 applied to the commutative diagram
0→HomgrA(L(M),N′)Homgr(L(f),g′)↓0→HomgrA(L(M1),N1′)→→Homgr(1,u)HomgrA(L(M),N)Homgr(L(f),g)↓HomgrA(L(M1),N1)→→HomgrA(L(M),N′′)Homgr(L(f),g′′)↓HomgrA(L(M1),N1′′)→→Homgr(1,v)00
Let N be an A-module, and
0→M′rMsM′′→0 an exact sequence of
A-modules; the sequence of complexes
0⟶HomgrA(M′′,I(N))Homgr(s,1)HomgrA(M,I(N)) Homgr(r,1)HomgrA(M′,I(N))⟶0 is exact (X, p. 83, prop. 2,
a) ; let
∂(FN):H(HomgrA(M′,I(N)))→H(HomgrA(M′′,I(N))) be the corresponding connecting homomorphism.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.