Bourbaki

Proposition 12

Tag 0DXK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DXK].

Algebra, chapter X, § 5. Modules d’extensions

The homomorphisms (14), (15), (16) are morphisms of complexes.

Let us prove it for example for the homomorphism (14). Denote

κ:Homgr⁡A(C′,C′′)⊗kHomgr⁡A(C,C′)→Homgr⁡A(C,C′) \kappa : \operatorname{Homgr}_A(C', C'') \otimes_k \operatorname{Homgr}_A(C, C') \to \operatorname{Homgr}_A(C, C')

this homomorphism. Let f∈Homgr⁡A(C′,C′′)pf \in \operatorname{Homgr}_A(C', C'')_p and g∈Homgr⁡A(C,C′)qg \in \operatorname{Homgr}_A(C, C')_q; then by definition one has κ(f⊗g)=f∘g\kappa(f \otimes g) = f \circ g. Moreover :

D(f⊗g)=Df⊗g+(−1)pf⊗Dg=(d′′∘f)⊗g−(−1)p(f∘d′)⊗g++(−1)pf⊗(d′∘g)−(−1)p+qf⊗(g∘d), \mathrm{D}(f \otimes g) = \mathrm{D}f \otimes g + (-1)^p f \otimes \mathrm{D}g = (d'' \circ f) \otimes g - (-1)^p (f \circ d') \otimes g + + (-1)^p f \otimes (d' \circ g) - (-1)^{p+q} f \otimes (g \circ d),

whence

κ(D(f⊗g))=d′′∘f∘g−(−1)pf∘d′∘g++(−1)pf∘d′∘g−(−1)p+qf∘g∘d=d′′∘f∘g−(−1)p+qf∘g∘d=D(f∘g)=D(κ(f⊗g)). \kappa(\mathrm{D}(f \otimes g)) = d'' \circ f \circ g - (-1)^p f \circ d' \circ g + + (-1)^p f \circ d' \circ g - (-1)^{p+q} f \circ g \circ d \\ = d'' \circ f \circ g - (-1)^{p+q} f \circ g \circ d = \mathrm{D}(f \circ g) = \mathrm{D}(\kappa(f \otimes g)).

One proves analogously that the homomorphisms (15) and (16) are morphisms of complexes.

One deduces from the morphism (14) homomorphisms of kk-modules (X, p. 62)

(17) Hp(Homgr⁡A(C′,C′′))⊗kHq(Homgr⁡A(C,C′))→Hp+q(Homgr⁡A(C,C′′))\mathrm{H}^p(\operatorname{Homgr}_A(C', C'')) \otimes_k \mathrm{H}^q(\operatorname{Homgr}_A(C, C')) \to \mathrm{H}^{p+q}(\operatorname{Homgr}_A(C, C'')).

Taking C=AC = A, one sees that the homomorphism :

(18) Homgr⁡A(C′,C′′)⊗kC′→C′′\operatorname{Homgr}_A(C', C'') \otimes_k C' \to C'' which maps f⊗xf \otimes x to f(x)f(x) is a morphism of complexes of left AA-modules ; there is associated to it a canonical homomorphism (XX, p. 80) of graded AA-modules γ:H(HomgrA(C′,C′′))⊗kH(C′)→H(C′′)\gamma : H(\mathrm{Homgr}_A(C', C'')) \otimes_k H(C') \to H(C''), which corresponds to the canonical homomorphism of kk-modules

λ:H(HomgrA(C′,C′′))→HomgrA(H(C′),H(C′′)) \lambda : H(\mathrm{Homgr}_A(C', C'')) \to \mathrm{Homgr}_A(H(C'), H(C''))

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.