Bourbaki

Corollary 2

Tag 0E0T, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0E0T].

Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dimension homologique

Let

0→M′→M→M′′→0 0 \to M' \to M \to M'' \to 0
be an exact sequence of AA-modules.

a) We have

dpA(M)≤sup⁡(dpA(M′),dpA(M′′)). \mathrm{dp}_A(M) \leq \sup (\mathrm{dp}_A(M'), \mathrm{dp}_A(M'')) .
Equality occurs as soon as dpA(M′′)≠dpA(M′)+1\mathrm{dp}_A(M'') \neq \mathrm{dp}_A(M') + 1.

b) We have

dpA(M′′)≤sup⁡(dpA(M),dpA(M′)+1). \mathrm{dp}_A(M'') \leq \sup (\mathrm{dp}_A(M), \mathrm{dp}_A(M') + 1) .
Equality occurs as soon as dpA(M)≠dpA(M′)\mathrm{dp}_A(M) \neq \mathrm{dp}_A(M').

c) We have

dpA(M′)≤sup⁡(dpA(M),dpA(M′′)−1). \mathrm{dp}_A(M') \leq \sup (\mathrm{dp}_A(M), \mathrm{dp}_A(M'') - 1) .
Equality occurs as soon as dpA(M)≠dpA(M′′)\mathrm{dp}_A(M) \neq \mathrm{dp}_A(M'').

Let us prove for example a), the proofs of b) and c) being analogous. If N is an arbitrary a-module and n an integer ≥0\geq 0, we have an exact sequence

ExtAn+1(M′′,N)→ExtAn+1(M,N)→ExtAn+1(M′,N)→ExtAn+2(M′′,N) \mathrm{Ext}_A^{n+1}(M'', N) \to \mathrm{Ext}_A^{n+1}(M, N) \to \mathrm{Ext}_A^{n+1}(M', N) \to \mathrm{Ext}_A^{n+2}(M'', N)
→ExtAn+2(M,N). \to \mathrm{Ext}_A^{n+2}(M, N) .
If dpA(M′),dpA(M′′)≤n\mathrm{dp}_A(M'), \mathrm{dp}_A(M'') \leq n, then ExtAn+1(M′,N)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^{n+1}(M', N) = 0 and ExtAn+1(M′′,N)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^{n+1}(M'', N) = 0 (prop. 1), hence ExtAn+1(M,N)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^{n+1}(M, N) = 0 and dpA(M)≤n\mathrm{dp}_A(M) \leq n (prop. 1), so that
dpA(M)≤sup⁡(dpA(M′),dpA(M′′)). \mathrm{dp}_A(M) \leq \sup (\mathrm{dp}_A(M'), \mathrm{dp}_A(M'')) .

If dpA(M)<sup⁡(dpA(M′),dpA(M′′))\mathrm{dp}_A(M)<\sup\bigl(\mathrm{dp}_A(M'),\mathrm{dp}_A(M'')\bigr), then necessarily dpA(M)<+∞\mathrm{dp}_A(M)<+\infty. For every n>dpA(M)n>\mathrm{dp}_A(M) and every a-module N, we have

Ext⁡An+1(M′,N)≠0⟺Ext⁡An+2(M′′,N)≠0, \operatorname{Ext}_A^{n+1}(M',N)\ne0\Longleftrightarrow\operatorname{Ext}_A^{n+2}(M'',N)\ne0,

by the preceding exact sequence; by prop. 1, this immediately implies dpA(M′′)=dpA(M′)+1\mathrm{dp}_A(M'')=\mathrm{dp}_A(M')+1, since one of the quantities dpA(M′)\mathrm{dp}_A(M'), dpA(M′′)\mathrm{dp}_A(M'') is >dpA(M)>\mathrm{dp}_A(M).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.