Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0E1A, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0E1A].

Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dimension homologique

Let ρ:A→A′\rho : A\to A' be a ring homomorphism, M an a-module, M′ an a′-module. If the a-module Ad′A'_d is flat, one has dpA(A′⊗AM)≤dpA(M)\mathrm{dp}_A(A'\otimes_A M)\leq\mathrm{dp}_A(M). If the a-module As′A'_s is projective, one has dpA(M′)≤dpA′(M′)\mathrm{dp}_A(M')\leq\mathrm{dp}_{A'}(M').

The first assertion is clear if dpA(M)=±∞\mathrm{dp}_A(M) = \pm \infty; if dpA(M)=n∈N\mathrm{dp}_A(M) = n \in \mathbf{N}, there exists an exact sequence of AA-modules

0→Pn→Pn−1→…→P0→M→0 0 \to P_n \to P_{n-1} \to \ldots \to P_0 \to M \to 0

where the PiP_i are projective ; the sequence of A′A'-modules

0→A′⊗APn→A′⊗APn−1→…→A′⊗AP0→A′⊗AM→0 0 \to A' \otimes_A P_n \to A' \otimes_A P_{n-1} \to \ldots \to A' \otimes_A P_0 \to A' \otimes_A M \to 0

is exact, since Ad′A'_d is flat, and the A′A'-modules A′⊗APiA' \otimes_A P_i are projective (II, p. 89, Corollary) ; therefore dpA′(A′⊗AM)≤n=dpA(M)\mathrm{dp}_{A'}(A' \otimes_A M) \leq n = \mathrm{dp}_A(M). The second assertion is clear if dpA′(M′)=±∞\mathrm{dp}_{A'}(M') = \pm \infty; if dpA′(M′)=m∈N\mathrm{dp}_{A'}(M') = m \in \mathbf{N}, there exists an exact sequence of A′A'-modules

0→Pm′→Pm−1′→…→P0′→M′→0, 0 \to P'_m \to P'_{m-1} \to \ldots \to P'_0 \to M' \to 0 ,

where the Pi′P'_i are projective ; the underlying sequence of AA-modules is exact. Moreover each Pi′P'_i is a sub-A′A'-module direct factor of a module As′(1){A'_s}^{(1)}, hence is a projective AA-module ; therefore one has dpA(M′)≤m=dpA′(M′)\mathrm{dp}_A(M') \leq m = \mathrm{dp}_{A'}(M').

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.