Let ρ:A→A′ be a ring homomorphism, M an a-module, M′ an a′-module. If the a-module Ad′ is flat, one has dpA(A′⊗AM)≤dpA(M). If the a-module As′ is projective, one has dpA(M′)≤dpA′(M′).
The first assertion is clear if dpA(M)=±∞; if dpA(M)=n∈N, there exists an exact sequence of A-modules
0→Pn→Pn−1→…→P0→M→0
where the Pi are projective ; the sequence of A′-modules
0→A′⊗APn→A′⊗APn−1→…→A′⊗AP0→A′⊗AM→0
is exact, since Ad′ is flat, and the A′-modules A′⊗APi are projective (II, p. 89, Corollary) ; therefore dpA′(A′⊗AM)≤n=dpA(M). The second assertion is clear if dpA′(M′)=±∞; if dpA′(M′)=m∈N, there exists an exact sequence of A′-modules
0→Pm′→Pm−1′→…→P0′→M′→0,
where the Pi′ are projective ; the underlying sequence of A-modules is exact. Moreover each Pi′ is a sub-A′-module direct factor of a module As′(1), hence is a projective A-module ; therefore one has dpA(M′)≤m=dpA′(M′).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.