therefore dh(A[X])≤dh(A)+1; conversely, if M is an A-module, let M be the A[X]-module obtained by equipping M with the structure for which XM=0, then (lemma 3)
dpA(M)=dpA[X](M)−1≤dh(A[X])−1,
therefore dh(A)≤dh(A[X])−1.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.