Bourbaki

Exercise 21, § 2

Commutative Algebra, III

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

One recalls that on a ring A, a topology is said to be linear (on the left) if it is a linear topology on the A-module AsA_s and if it is compatible with the ring structure of A (chap. II, § 2, exerc. 16). One says that a topological ring A is linearly compact (on the left) (resp. strictly linearly compact (on the left)) if AsA_s is a linearly compact A-module (resp. strictly linearly compact).

a) Now prove that if A is linearly compact on the left for a topology C\mathscr{C}, the topology C∗\mathscr{C}^* defined in exerc. 18 b) is again compatible with the ring structure of A (use exerc. 18 d)).

b) Suppose that A is commutative; let u≠0u \neq 0 be an idempotent of A/RA/\mathscr{R}, where R\mathscr{R} is the radical of A. Now prove that if A is linearly compact for the discrete topology, there exists one and only one idempotent e∈Ae \in A whose image in A/RA/\mathscr{R} is equal to uu. (Now prove that among the affine linear varieties x+bx + b, where b⊂Rb \subset \mathscr{R} and x2−x∈bx^2 - x \in b, which are contained in the class uu, there is a minimal element e+ae + a. Deduce that e2=ee^2 = e and a=0a = 0, by considering the element e2−e=re^2 - e = r and proving that r∈Ar2r \in Ar^2, with the aid of Alg., chap. VIII, § 6, exerc. 10 a). Prove the uniqueness of ee by proving that if e1,e2e_1, e_2 are two idempotents of A such that e1e2∈Re_1e_2 \in \mathscr{R}, one has e1e2=0e_1e_2 = 0.)

c) Now prove that every commutative ring A which is linearly compact for the discrete topology is a direct composite of a finite number of local rings (linearly compact for the discrete topology). (Consider first the case where R=0\mathscr{R} = 0, using exerc. 15 b) and chap. II, § 1, no 2, prop. 5, then apply b) to the idempotents of A/RA/\mathscr{R}.)

d) Now prove that every commutative linearly compact (resp. strictly linearly compact) ring A is a product of a family of local rings which are linearly compact (resp. strictly linearly compact). (Let (mλ)(\mathfrak{m}_\lambda) be the family of open maximal ideals of A; for every open ideal aa not containing mλ\mathfrak{m}_\lambda, let Aλ′×Aλ′′A_\lambda' \times A_\lambda'' be the decomposition of A/aA/a into a direct composite of two rings, such that Aλ′A_\lambda' is the local ring with maximal ideal (mλ+a)/a(\mathfrak{m}_\lambda + a)/a, defined in c) ; let eλ′(a)e'_\lambda(a) be the unit element of Aλ′A_\lambda', considered as a class mod. aa in A ; the eλ′(a)e'_\lambda(a) form a filter basis which converges in A to an idempotent eλe_\lambda, and AeλAe_\lambda is a closed ideal of A of which eλe_\lambda is the unit element. Now prove that the ring AeλAe_\lambda is a local ring and that A is isomorphic to the product of the AeλAe_\lambda.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.