Bourbaki

Exercise 23, § 2

Commutative Algebra, III

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let AA be a commutative ring endowed with a linear topology C\mathscr{C}.

a) Now prove that the ideals aa of AA, closed for C\mathscr{C} and such that A/aA/a is artinian, form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 00 for a linear topology C(c)\mathscr{C}^{(c)} on AA, less fine than C\mathscr{C} (use Alg., chap. VIII, § 2, exerc. 12); one has (C(c))(c)=C(c)(\mathscr{C}^{(c)})^{(c)} = \mathscr{C}^{(c)}. Let BB be the separated completion of the ring AA for the topology C(c)\mathscr{C}^{(c)}; now prove that BB is strictly linearly compact; one says that BB is the strictly linearly compact ring associated with AA.

b) Let Cω(A)\mathscr{C}_\omega(A) be the discrete topology on AA, Cc(A)\mathscr{C}_c(A) the topology (Cω(A))(c)(\mathscr{C}_\omega(A))^{(c)}. For the topology C(c)\mathscr{C}^{(c)} on AA to be separated, it is necessary and sufficient that C\mathscr{C} be separated and that, for every ideal bb of AA, open for C\mathscr{C}, the topology Cc(A/b)\mathscr{C}_c(A/b) be separated. If AA is a non-discrete valuation ring of rank 1 (chap. VI), Cc(A)\mathscr{C}_c(A) is not separated.

c) Suppose that AA is linearly compact for C\mathscr{C}; then AA is complete (but in general non-separated) for C(c)\mathscr{C}^{(c)}. For C(c)\mathscr{C}^{(c)} to be then separated, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist on AA a linear topology, strictly linearly compact, and less fine than C\mathscr{C}; C(c)\mathscr{C}^{(c)} is then the unique topology having these properties.

d) Let EE be an AA-module linearly topologized and strictly linearly compact. Now prove that when AA is endowed with the topology Cc(A)\mathscr{C}_c(A), EE is a topological AA-module (note that if FF is an AA-module artinian, then, for every x∈Fx \in F, the annihilator aa of xx is such that A/aA/a is artinian). Deduce that, if BB is the separated completion of AA for the topology Cc(A)\mathscr{C}_c(A), EE can be considered as a topological BB-module; the ring BB being isomorphic to a product of local rings BλB_\lambda strictly linearly compact (Exercise 21 d)), now prove that EE is isomorphic to a product of strictly linearly compact submodules EλE_\lambda, where EλE_\lambda is annihilated by the BμB_\mu of index μ≠λ\mu \neq \lambda and can consequently be considered as a topological BλB_\lambda-module (if eλe_\lambda is the unit element of BλB_\lambda, take Eλ=eλ.EE_\lambda = e_\lambda . E).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.