Bourbaki

Exercise 34, § 1

Commutative Algebra, IX

Let R=Z[X,Y]R = \mathbf{Z}[X, Y] be the Z\mathbf{Z}-algebra of polynomials in two families of indeterminates X=(Xn)n∈JX = (X_n)_{n \in J} and Y=(Yn)n∈JY = (Y_n)_{n \in J}. For every prime number pp, let σp\sigma_p be the endomorphism of RR defined by σp(Xn)=Xnp\sigma_p(X_n) = X_n^p and σp(Yn)=Ynp\sigma_p(Y_n) = Y_n^p for every n∈Jn \in J; one then has σp(a)≡apmod  .pR\sigma_p(a) \equiv a^p \mod. pR for every a∈Ra \in R. Moreover, RR is Z\mathbf{Z}-torsion-free. a) There exist in RJR^J elements S=(Sn)n∈JS = (S_n)_{n \in J}, P=(Pn)n∈JP = (P_n)_{n \in J}, I=(In)n∈JI = (I_n)_{n \in J}, and, for every q∈Jq \in J, Fq=(Fq,n)n∈JF_q = (F_{q,n})_{n \in J} and Vq=(Vq,n)n∈JV_q = (V_{q,n})_{n \in J}, characterized respectively by the equalities

Φ(S)=Φ(X)+Φ(Y),Φ(P)=Φ(X)⋅Φ(Y),Φ(I)=−Φ(X),Φ(Fq)=fq(Φ(X)),Φ(Vq)=vq(Φ(X)). \begin{align*} \Phi(S) &= \Phi(X) + \Phi(Y), \\ \Phi(P) &= \Phi(X) \cdot \Phi(Y), \\ \Phi(I) &= -\Phi(X), \\ \Phi(F_q) &= f_q(\Phi(X)), \\ \Phi(V_q) &= v_q(\Phi(X)). \end{align*}

(On embedding R in Q ⊗\otimes R, we have, with the notation of Exercise 33,

Sn(X,Y)=Ψn(Φ(X)+Φ(Y)),Pn(X,Y)=Ψn(Φ(X).Φ(Y)),In(X)=Ψn(−Φ(X)), S_n(X, Y) = \Psi_n(\Phi(X) + \Phi(Y)), \quad P_n(X, Y) = \Psi_n(\Phi(X).\Phi(Y)), \quad I_n(X) = \Psi_n(-\Phi(X)),
Fq,n(X)=Ψn(fq(Φ(X))),andVq,n(X)=Ψn(vq(Φ(X))). F_{q,n}(X) = \Psi_n(f_q(\Phi(X))), \quad \text{and} \quad V_{q,n}(X) = \Psi_n(v_q(\Phi(X))).
) b) For every n∈Jn \in J, assign weight nn to XnX_n and YnY_n. Then Sn,PnS_n, P_n and InI_n depend only on the families (Xd)d∈Jn(X_d)_{d \in J_n} and (Yd)d∈Jn(Y_d)_{d \in J_n}. Moreover: α)\alpha) SnS_n is isobaric of weight nn. β)\beta) PnP_n is isobaric of weight 2n2n, and isobaric of weight nn in each of the families (Xd)d∈Jn(X_d)_{d \in J_n} and (Yd)d∈Jn(Y_d)_{d \in J_n}. γ)\gamma) InI_n is isobaric of weight nn. c) Fq,nF_{q,n} is isobaric of weight qnqn, and depends only on the family (Xd)d∈Jqn(X_d)_{d \in J_{qn}}. d) One has Vq,n(X)=Xn/qV_{q,n}(X) = X_{n/q}, where by convention Xn/q=0X_{n/q} = 0 if n/q∉Jn/q \notin J. (It is enough to verify that with this definition of VqV_q, one has vq(Φ(X))=Φ(Vq(X))v_q(\Phi(X)) = \Phi(V_q(X)).)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4. Not checked by a person.