Let p be a prime number, A a ring, and a∈U(A). a) We have Fp(a)≡apmod.pAJ; in other words, we have Fp,n(a)≡anpmod.pA for every n∈J. b) We have Fp(a)≡a∗pmod.p×U(A), where a∗p denotes the product in U(A) of p terms equal to a, and where p×U(A) denotes the ideal of U(A) generated by p×1U(A), the sum in U(A) of p terms equal to 1U(A). (It is enough to treat the case where A=Z[X] and a=X. Then A has no Z-torsion and Φ:U(A)→AJ is injective. For a) it is enough (p. 51, Exerc. 30, b)) to prove that, for every n∈J, Φn(Fp(X))=Φpn(X) is congruent to Φn(Xp) modulo pwp(pn)A, which results from Exerc. 29, p. 51. For b) it is enough to prove that Φ(Fp(X))=fp(Φ(X)) is congruent to Φ(X∗p)=Φ(X)p modulo p.Φ(U(A)). Now there exists an element u∈AJ such that
fp(Φ(X))−Φ(X)p=(Φnp(X)−Φn(X)p)n∈J=p.u(p. 51, exerc. 29) and it is a question of proving that
u∈Φ(U(A)). For every prime number
q, let
σq be the endomorphism of the ring
A=Z[X] such that
σq(Xn)=Xnq for every
n∈J. By Exerc. 32, p. 51, it is enough to prove that, for every prime number
q and for every
n∈J, we have
uqn≡σq(un)mod.qwq(qn)A, which is equivalent to proving the following congruence (1)
Φpqn(X)−Φqn(X)p≡σq(Φpn(X)−Φn(X)p)mod.pqwq(qn)A. Now the right-hand term is equal to
Φpn(Xq)−Φn(Xq)p. By Exerc. 29, p. 51, we have (2)
Φpqn(X)≡Φpn(Xq)mod.qwq(pqn)A and (3)
Φqn(X)≡Φn(Xq)mod.qwq(qn)A. The right-hand and left-hand terms of (1) are both congruent to zero modulo
pA (p. 51, Exerc. 29), hence (1) results from (2) and (3) if
q=p. Suppose that we have
q=p. Then it results from (3) and Lemma 1 that we have (4)
Φpn(X)p≡Φn(Xp)pmod.pwp(pn)+1A, and (1) results from (2) and (4).)