Bourbaki

Exercise 48, § 1

Commutative Algebra, IX

Let AA be a pre-λ\lambda-ring. Let Ψ\Psi denote the composite A→λΛ(A)→LAJA \xrightarrow{\lambda} \Lambda(A) \xrightarrow{L} A^J, so that Ψ(a)=(ψn(a))n∈J\Psi(a) = (\psi_n(a))_{n \in J}, where

−TddTλ(a)/λ(a)=∑n∈Jψn(a)(−T)n. - T \frac{d}{dT} \lambda(a)/\lambda(a) = \sum_{n \in J} \psi_n(a)(-T)^n .

More explicitly,

−nλn(a)=(−1)nψn(a)+(−1)n−1ψn−1(a)⋅λ1(a)+⋯+(−ψ1(a))⋅λn−1(a) -n \lambda_n(a) = (-1)^n \psi_n(a) + (-1)^{n-1} \psi_{n-1}(a) \cdot \lambda_1(a) + \cdots + (-\psi_1(a)) \cdot \lambda_{n-1}(a)

for every n∈Jn \in J. In particular,

ψ1(a)=λ1(a)=aψ2(a)=λ1(a)2−2λ2(a)ψ3(a)=λ1(a)3−3λ1(a)λ2(a)+3λ3(a). \begin{align*} \psi_1(a) &= \lambda_1(a) = a \\ \psi_2(a) &= \lambda_1(a)^2 - 2\lambda_2(a) \\ \psi_3(a) &= \lambda_1(a)^3 - 3\lambda_1(a)\lambda_2(a) + 3\lambda_3(a) . \end{align*}

The mappings ψn:A→A\psi_n : A \to A are called Adams operations.

When (A,λ)=(Λ(B),λB)(A, \lambda) = (\Lambda(B), \lambda^B), where BB is a ring, we shall also write ΨB\Psi^B for Ψ\Psi.

a) Let BB be a ring. Show that for every n∈Jn \in J, one has

ψnB=Fn:Λ(B)→Λ(B). \psi_n^B = F_n : \Lambda(B) \to \Lambda(B) .

(Use the commutative diagram)

!Commutative diagram

where all the horizontal mappings are bijective.)

b) Let AA be a pre-λ\lambda-ring. For every n∈Jn \in J, ψn\psi_n is an endomorphism of the additive group of AA, and ψ1=IdA\psi_1 = \mathrm{Id}_A. If AA is a λ\lambda-ring, ψn\psi_n is an endomorphism of the ring AA, and ψn∘ψm=ψnm\psi_n \circ \psi_m = \psi_{nm} for every n,mn, m in JJ. Moreover, for every prime number pp one has ψp(a)≡apmod  pA\psi_p(a) \equiv a^p \mod pA for every a∈Aa \in A. (Use the injectivity of λ:A→Λ(A)\lambda : A \to \Lambda(A), and the analogous properties of ψnA=Fn\psi_n^A = F_n.)

c) Let AA be a pre-λ\lambda-ring whose additive group is Z\mathbf{Z}-torsion-free. In order that AA be a λ\lambda-ring, it is necessary and sufficient that the following conditions be satisfied for all integers n≥2n \geq 2 and m≥2m \geq 2:

(i) ψn(1)=1\psi_n(1) = 1; (ii) ψn(ab)=ψn(a)ψn(b)\psi_n(ab) = \psi_n(a) \psi_n(b) for every a,ba, b in AA; (iii) ψn∘ψm=ψnm\psi_n \circ \psi_m = \psi_{nm}.

(Since L:Λ(A)→AJL : \Lambda(A) \to A^J is an injective homomorphism of rings, Ψ=L∘λ\Psi = L \circ \lambda is a homomorphism of rings if and only if λ\lambda is one. Likewise, from the diagram

AJ→λJΛ(A)J↙L↘LΛ(A)Λ(A)→Λ(λ)Λ(Λ(A))↑λ↑λAA→λΛ(A) \begin{array}{ccccccccc} A^J & \xrightarrow{\lambda^J} & \Lambda(A)^J \\ & \swarrow_{L} & \searrow^{L_{\Lambda(A)}} \\ \Lambda(A) & \xrightarrow{\Lambda(\lambda)} & \Lambda(\Lambda(A)) \\ & \uparrow_{\lambda} & \uparrow^{\lambda^A} \\ A & \xrightarrow{\lambda} & \Lambda(A) \end{array}

one deduces that

Λ(λ)∘λ=λA∘λ(λ is a λ-morphism) \Lambda(\lambda) \circ \lambda = \lambda^A \circ \lambda \quad (\lambda \text{ is a } \lambda\text{-morphism})
⇔λJ∘Ψ=ΨA∘λ⇔λ∘ψn=ψnA∘λ for every n \Leftrightarrow \lambda^J \circ \Psi = \Psi^A \circ \lambda \Leftrightarrow \lambda \circ \psi_n = \psi_n^A \circ \lambda \text{ for every } n
⇔L∘λ∘ψn=L∘ψnA∘λ for every n. \Leftrightarrow L \circ \lambda \circ \psi_n = L \circ \psi_n^A \circ \lambda \text{ for every } n.

Now L∘λ=ΨL \circ \lambda = \Psi and L∘ψnA=L∘Fn=fn∘LL \circ \psi_n^A = L \circ F_n = f_n \circ L. Hence

Λ(λ)∘λ=λA∘λ⇔Ψ∘ψn=fn∘Ψ for every n \Lambda(\lambda) \circ \lambda = \lambda^A \circ \lambda \Leftrightarrow \Psi \circ \psi_n = f_n \circ \Psi \text{ for every } n
⇔ψm∘ψn=ψnm for all m and n. \Leftrightarrow \psi_m \circ \psi_n = \psi_{nm} \text{ for all } m \text{ and } n.

d) Let AA be a λ\lambda-ring. Let a∈Aa \in A be an element of λ\lambda-rank ≤1\leq 1 (i.e. λ(a)=1+aT\lambda(a) = 1 + aT). Then ψn(a)=an\psi_n(a) = a^n for every n∈Jn \in J. If PP is a multiplicative subset of AA consisting of elements of λ\lambda-rank ≤1\leq 1 and if a1,...,ara_1, ..., a_r belong to PP, one has ψn(a1+⋯+ar)=a1n+⋯+arn\psi_n(a_1 + \cdots + a_r) = a_1^n + \cdots + a_r^n.

In the polynomial algebra Z[(Xi)i∈I]\mathbf{Z}[(X_i)_{i \in I}], let (sn)(s_n) denote the elementary symmetric polynomials,

∑n≥0snTn=∏i(1+XiT), \sum_{n \geq 0} s_n T^n = \prod_i (1 + X_i T),
and let
vn(s1,...,sn)=∑iXin v_n(s_1, ..., s_n) = \sum_i X_i^n
be the nn-th Newton polynomial. Now prove that, for every a∈Aa \in A, one has
ψn(a)=vn(λ1(a),...,λn(a)). \psi_n(a) = v_n(\lambda_1(a), ..., \lambda_n(a)).
(First verify this relation when aa is of the form a1+⋯+ara_1 + \cdots + a_r as above. Proceed from there to the case where a=1+∑h≥1shTh∈Λ(Z[(Xi)i∈I])a = 1 + \sum_{h \geq 1} s_h T^h \in \Lambda(\mathbf{Z}[(X_i)_{i \in I}]). Then deduce the general case by embedding AA in the λ\lambda-ring Λ(A)\Lambda(A) and using the homomorphism Z[(sh)h=1,...,n]→A\mathbf{Z}[(s_h)_{h=1,...,n}] \to A which sends shs_h to λh(a)\lambda_h(a).)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4. Not checked by a person.