Exercise 23, § 3
Commutative Algebra, VII
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
Let be a Krull ring, its field of fractions, a derivation of such that , the subfield of which is the kernel of and the Krull ring ; suppose that has characteristic ; one has and , so that is the integral closure of in , and the canonical homomorphism is defined (§ 1, No. 10). We denote by the group of invertible elements of .
a) If is such that is the canonical image of a divisor of , now prove that one has (note that for every prime ideal of height 1 of , there exists such that , and observe that is stable under ). Let be the additive subgroup of formed by the (“logarithmic derivatives”) which belong to (for or , which amounts to the same thing, and ), and let be the subgroup of formed by the , where . Now prove that, for every divisor such that the image of is a principal divisor in , the class mod. of for every such that depends only on the class of in , and deduce a canonical injective homomorphism of into .
(b) Prove that if is not contained in any prime ideal of height 1 of and if , is bijective. (Reduce to proving that if is such that and if is a prime ideal of height 1 in such that is not multiple of , then , where ; for this, deduce from the assumption that if is a uniformizer of , one has , so that is stable under , and that therefore defines by passing to quotients a derivation of the residue field ; prove that , and deduce that .
(c) Let be a field of characteristic 2, the polynomial ring , the derivation of such that , , ; the field kernel of is such that . One has , but prove that is not the canonical image of a divisor of . (Reason by contradiction by assuming that for , ; there would then be in a uniformizer of , necessarily of the form with ; deduce that one would have and obtain a contradiction by calculating ).
Solution
No solution has been written yet.