Bourbaki

Exercise 5, § 1

Commutative Algebra, VIII, p. 81

If A is a ring (not necessarily commutative), M a left A-module, denote by Kdev(M) the deviation of the set of submodules of M, ordered by inclusion. Put Kdev(A) = Kdev(A_s). a) If N is a submodule of an A-module M, one has

Kdev⁡(M)=sup⁡(Kdev⁡(N),Kdev⁡(M/N)). \operatorname{Kdev}(M) = \sup(\operatorname{Kdev}(N), \operatorname{Kdev}(M/N)) .
b) Suppose A is commutative. If p and q are two prime ideals of A such that p⊂qp \subset q and p≠qp \neq q, one has dev⁡(A/p)>dev⁡(A/q)\operatorname{dev}(A/p) > \operatorname{dev}(A/q). (Use the ideals p+Axp + Ax, where x is an element of q−pq - p.) Deduce dim⁡(A)≤Kdev⁡(A)\dim(A) \leq \operatorname{Kdev}(A). c) Suppose A is commutative and noetherian. Exercise prove that one has dim⁡(A)=Kdev⁡(A)\dim(A) = \operatorname{Kdev}(A) (reason by induction on dim⁡(A)\dim(A), assuming that Kdev⁡(B)≤dim⁡(B)\operatorname{Kdev}(B) \leq \dim(B) for every commutative noetherian ring B such that dim⁡(B)<dim⁡(A)\dim(B) < \dim(A); let S be the set of s∈As \in A which do not belong to any of the prime ideals pp of A such that dim⁡(A)=dim⁡(A/p)\dim(A) = \dim(A/p); now prove that, for every finitely generated A-module M such that S−1M=0S^{-1}M = 0, one has Kdev(M) < dim(A); using the fact that S−1AS^{-1}A is artinian, deduce that Kdev(A) \leq dim(A)). Proving that one has dim(M) = Kdev(M) for every finitely generated A-module M.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.