Commutative Algebra, X, p. 156
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
Let B be a noetherian integrally closed ring, G a finite group of automorphisms of B, A the ring of invariants of G.
a) Suppose that for every prime ideal p of A of height 1 and every prime ideal q of B lying above p, the valuation vq is unramified with respect to vp (VI, § 8, No. 1). Let i:C(A)→C(B) be the canonical homomorphism on the groups of divisor classes (VII, § 1, No. 10); prove that the kernel of i is isomorphic to the cohomology group H1(G,B∗) (A, X, p. 111; let L be the field of fractions of B; consider the exact sequence of Z(G)-modules
0→B∗→L∗→D(B)→C(B)→0,
by observing that H0(G,D(B)) identifies with D(A) and that H1(G,L∗) is zero).
b) Let k be a field of characteristic 2; take for B the ring k[X1,…,X4], and for G the group of automorphisms of the k-algebra B generated by the automorphism σ such that σ(Xi)=Xi+1 for 1≤i≤3 and σ(X4)=X1. Deduce from a) that the ring A of invariants of G is factorial.
c) Let m be the trace on A of the ideal (X1,…,X4); put s=X1+…+X4, t=(X1+X3)(X2+X4), u=(X1+X2)(X3+X4)(X1+X4)(X2+X3), v=X1X2X3X4. Prove that the sequence (s,t,u,v) is transversal but not completely transversal for Am. (Let x=X12(X2+X3)+X22(X3+X4)+X32(X4+X1)+X42(X1+X2), y=X1X3+X2X4, w=X1X2X3+X2X3X4+X3X4X1+X4X1X2; prove that one has sw+y2=u and that xy+tw is divisible by s, so that ux belongs to the ideal (s,t).)
d) Prove that A is not a Macaulay ring, and that the sub-A-module A.1B is not a direct factor in B.