Bourbaki

Exercise 10, § 3

Commutative Algebra, X, p. 160

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

We retain the hypotheses of Exercise 9; we suppose that the complex LL is exact in degree ≠0\neq 0.

a) Prove the inclusion V(d(di+1))⊂V(d(di))V(\mathfrak{d}(d_{i+1})) \subset V(\mathfrak{d}(d_i)) for all i≥1i \geq 1 (observe that according to Exercise 8, a prime ideal pp does not contain d(di)\mathfrak{d}(d_i) if and only if the ApA_p-module (Coker di)p(\mathrm{Coker}\ d_i)_p is free).

b) We now suppose that the annihilator of H0(L)H_0(L) is not reduced to zero. Prove that we have rg(d1)=rgA(L0)\mathrm{rg}(d_1) = \mathrm{rg}_A(L_0) (if ff is a cancellable element of d(d1)\mathfrak{d}(d_1), the AfA_f-module H0(L)fH_0(L)_f is projective of constant rank according to Exercise 8, hence necessarily zero); deduce that the support of H0(L)H_0(L) is V(d(d1))V(\mathfrak{d}(d_1)).

c) Put p=profA(d(d1);A)p = \mathrm{prof}_A(\mathfrak{d}(d_1); A). Prove that one has V(d(di))=Supp(H0(L))V(\mathfrak{d}(d_i)) = \mathrm{Supp}(H_0(L)) for 1≤i≤p1 \leq i \leq p (reason as in the proof of a), observing that if a prime ideal pp of the support of H0(L)H_0(L) did not contain d(dk)\mathfrak{d}(d_k), one would have dpApH0(L)p<k≤gradeApH0(L)p\mathrm{dp}_{A_p} H_0(L)_p < k \leq \mathrm{grade}_{A_p} H_0(L)_p.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.