§ 2. Discriminant of a sesquilinear form
for example , where is prime ; is then a vector space of the same dimension over as over ; consider the mapping .
c) Assume . Let be a bijective mapping of onto the set of subspaces of finite codimension of , such that , and . Show that there exists a sesquilinear form on , non-degenerate on the right, and such that for every . (Use Theorem 1 of Chapter II, § 4, No. 6).
¶ 11) a) Let be a left and right artinian ring (Chapter VIII, § 2, No. 3). Show that the following conditions are equivalent: 1° the right annihilator (resp. left annihilator) of every left ideal (resp. right ideal) is not reduced to 0 ; 2° the dual of every simple left (resp. right) -module is not reduced to 0 ; 3° the dual of every left (resp. right) -module of finite type is not reduced to 0. A ring is said to satisfy the condition (resp. ) if it satisfies these conditions for the left (resp. right) -modules.
b) Let be a left and right artinian ring satisfying the condition , (resp. ) a left (resp. right) free -module, having a countable basis over , a bilinear form on such that is injective. Let be a free submodule of ; show that there exists a free submodule of and a basis (resp. ) of (resp. ) such that ; one can moreover take for any free element of . (Notice that if is a free element of , the image of by the mapping is the ring itself; proceed then by induction to construct the bases and ). Deduce that if the basis of is finite, is the direct sum of and , and that one has .
c) Retain the hypotheses of b), and suppose in addition that satisfies condition and that is injective. Show that there exists a basis in and a basis in such that . (Use b) by determining and alternately by induction).
12) Let be a real Hilbert space of countable type, the scalar product in . Show that there does not exist a system of two algebraic bases of the vector space over such that for every pair of indices. (First observe that the set of indices of these bases would have the power of the continuum (, chap. II, § 3, exerc. 15)); then consider a (countable) orthonormal basis of and observe that the subspace generated by the is contained in the subspace generated by a countable subfamily of .
Definition 1
Given a sesquilinear form for on and a system of elements of , the discriminant of with respect to this system is called, and is denoted by or , the element of .
If is a basis of , the discriminant of with respect to this basis is none other than the determinant of the matrix of with respect to this basis.
It follows from the definition of the extension of to (, no 9) that we have
where denotes the extension of to . For every permutation , we therefore have
Example
Let be an algebra over the ring , such that is a free -module of finite dimension . Then the mapping (Chapter VIII, § 12, no 2) is a bilinear form on . Given a system of elements of , the discriminant of this form with respect to this system is called the discriminant of the system over , and is denoted by . Thus
Remark
Soient a basis of over , and
(chap. II, § 7, no 2). Since the matrix of the -linear endomorphism of with respect to is , we have , whence . It follows that
Proposition 1
Let be a sesquilinear form for on , a system of elements of , and a family of elements of ; put . We then have
Indeed, since is a sesquilinear form, we have . Hence, if we denote by the matrix , the matrix is equal to . Since , and , our assertion is proved.
In particular, if and are two bases of and the discriminants of with respect to these bases, and the determinant of the passing matrix from the basis to the basis , we have
It follows from prop. 1 that, if is a basis of and an arbitrary system of elements of , divides . In particular the discriminants of with respect to any two bases of generate the same principal ideal of .
Let be a finite family of finite-dimensional free -modules, a sesquilinear form for on , and a basis of . If denotes the direct sum of the (§ 1, no 3) and the basis of obtained by joining the , then obviously
Let be a sesquilinear form for on , a homomorphism of into a commutative ring , the sesquilinear form on obtained by extension of (§ 1, no 4) and an arbitrary system of elements of . Since is a free -module, is defined, and we have obviously
Example
Let be an algebra over which is a free -module of finite dimension , a basis of over , and an ideal of . If denotes the canonical homomorphism of onto , is a basis of over (chap. I, § 6, no 5, prop. 5), and is isomorphic to . We therefore have
Proposition 2
Suppose that is an integral domain. Let be a sesquilinear form for on and a basis of , such that .
a) For a system of elements of to be free, it is necessary and sufficient that be .
b) For a system of elements of to be a basis of , it is necessary and sufficient that and be associated elements in (cf. Chapter VI, § 1, No. 5).
Let (). Let us first prove a). If , we have (Prop. 1) since and is integral; we therefore have , and the vectors are linearly dependent (Chapter III, § 7, No. 1, Th. 1, applied to the vector space , where denotes the field of fractions of ). Conversely, if these vectors are linearly dependent we have (ibid.), whence (Prop. 1).
Let us now prove b). If and are associated in , Prop. 1 shows that is invertible in . Thus is itself invertible in ; hence the matrix over is invertible (Chapter III, § 6, No. 5, Th. 2), and the endomorphism of defined by () is an automorphism; consequently is a basis of . The converse follows immediately from Prop. 1.
Proposition 3
Let be a sesquilinear form for on , and let be a basis of . The following conditions are equivalent:
a) The mapping from into associated with is bijective.
b) The mapping from into associated with is bijective.
c) The element is invertible in .
Indeed condition c) expresses that the matrix of with respect to is invertible (Chapter III, § 6, No. 5, Th. 2). Thus c) is equivalent to a) ( No. 10); similarly c) is equivalent to b).
Proposition 4
Suppose that is integral. Let be a basis of . A necessary and sufficient condition for a sesquilinear form on to be nondegenerate is that one has .
Indeed, let K be the field of fractions of A, and let be the extension of to the K-vector space ; identify E with a subset of this vector space. The relation is then equivalent to (formula (6)), which itself expresses that is bijective (prop. 3), that is to say that is nondegenerate (§ 1, No. 6, prop. 6). Now, for every , there exists such that ; consequently, for to be degenerate, it is necessary and sufficient that be so. This proves our assertion.
Proposition 5
Let A be a field, B a commutative algebra of finite dimension n over A, and S a basis of B. In order that B be separable (chap. VIII, § 7, No. 5, def. 1), it is necessary and sufficient that one have* .
Indeed, let be the algebraic closure of A, and let be the algebra over . If B is separable, is semisimple (chap. VIII, § 7, No. 5, cor. of prop. 7) and is therefore the direct sum of n fields isomorphic to (chap. VIII, § 6, No. 4, cor. of prop. 9). If denotes the canonical basis of (identified with ), one has , whence (prop. 1) and (formula (6)).
Conversely suppose that one has . To prove that B is separable, it is enough to prove that is semisimple, that is to say that it admits no nonzero nilpotent element. Now, if were a nonzero nilpotent element of , it could be taken as the first element of a basis of , and one would then have for every since a nilpotent endomorphism has its eigenvalues zero (chap. VII, § 5, No. 3, cor. 3 of prop. 8), and hence a zero trace. It would follow that , whence (prop. 1) and (formula (6)), contrary to the assumption.
Remark
Suppose that B is an overfield of A. Let be a basis of B, and the A-isomorphisms of B into the algebraic closure of A (each being repeated times). Recall that, for every , one has (chap. VIII, § 12, No. 2, prop. 4).
It follows then from the formula for multiplication of determinants that one has
This formula shows that Proposition 5 generalizes the separability condition given in chap. V, § 7, No. 2, Remark.
Proposition 6
Let be an A-bilinear form on E, and K a subring of A such that A is a K-module free of finite dimension q. If is a basis of E over A and a basis of A over K, then is a basis of E over K. The mapping of into K defined by is a K-bilinear form on E, and one has
The first two assertions being evident, it is enough to prove (7). By definition the first member is the determinant of the K-linear endomorphism of E defined by
Consider the A-linear endomorphism of E defined by , and the K-linear endomorphism of E defined by . We have
since for all ; thus is the composite mapping . Therefore, denoting by the mapping considered as a K-linear mapping, we have . Now (chap. VIII, § 12, no 2, prop. 7), and it is clear that . On the other hand, since each of the A-modules is stable under , and the determinant of the restriction of to is , we have . Formula (8) therefore reduces to , a formula proved above.
Corollary (« Transitivity Formula for Discriminants »)
Let K be a commutative ring, A a commutative algebra admitting a finite basis over K, and E an algebra over A admitting a finite basis . Then is a basis of E over K, and we have
Indeed, if we put , the K-bilinear form of Prop. 6 is by the transitivity formula for traces (Chap. VIII, § 12, no 2, cor. of Prop. 7).
Exercises. — 1) Let A be an algebra of finite rank over a commutative field K, having a unit element. a) Show that if the radical of A is not zero, the bilinear form on A is degenerate. b) Suppose that K is of characteristic 0. Show that if A is a matrix algebra , S the canonical basis of A over K, then . c) Deduce from a) and b) that, for an algebra A of finite rank over a field K of characteristic 0 to be absolutely semisimple, it is necessary and sufficient that the bilinear form be non-degenerate (or, what amounts to the same thing, that for every basis S of A over K).
¶ 2) Let B be a ring, A a subring of B containing the unit element of B; B is therefore a (A, A)-bimodule; denote by (resp. ) the set B considered as a left (resp. right) A-module, by (resp. ) the right (resp. left) A-module dual of (resp. ). For every and every , is an A-linear form on , hence an element of which is denoted by ; the mapping defines on a left B-module structure (cf. chap. III, 2nd ed., App. II, No. 7). a) Let be a homomorphism of the (A, A)-bimodule B into the (A, A)-bimodule A; in order that the A-bilinear mapping from into A be non-degenerate, it is necessary and sufficient that contain no ideal (left or right) of B distinct from . One then says that is a Frobenius homomorphism of B into A. b) Let be a Frobenius homomorphism of B into A; show that the mapping associated on the right with is an isomorphism of the left B-module onto a submodule of the left B-module . Show that is bijective in each of the following two cases: 1° A is a left and right artinian ring satisfying the conditions (N_s) and (N_d) (§ 1, exerc. 11), and and are A-modules of finite length (use exerc. 11 b) of the § 1); 2° A is an artinian commutative and involutive ring (chap. VIII, § 3, exerc. 11), contained in the center of B, and is an A-module of finite length (use exerc. 11 of chap. VIII, § 3).
c) Conversely, show that if and are isomorphic, there exists a Frobenius homomorphism of B into A when one is in one of the two cases considered in b) and and have the same length (use exerc. 11 b) of the § 1).
d) With the hypotheses and notations of a), show that the right annihilator (resp. left annihilator) of a left ideal I (resp. of a right ideal r) of B, is the orthogonal (resp. ) for the form of the submodule I (resp. r) of (resp. ).
e) Let be a Frobenius homomorphism of B into A. Show that if A is an involutive artinian ring (chap. VIII, § 3, exerc. 11) the same is true of B, when one supposes in addition that one or the other of the conditions of b) is satisfied (use b) and d)).
¶ 3) Let A be a commutative field, B a finite rank algebra over A, having a unit element.
a) In order that B be a Frobenius algebra, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist a Frobenius homomorphism of B into A (exerc. 2). (Use exerc. 2 c) and e) above, and exerc. 6 b) of chap. VIII, § 13).
b) Let be a Frobenius homomorphism of B into A; every A-linear form on B can then be written in one and only one way (resp. ) where and belong to B; in order that this form be a Frobenius homomorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that (resp. ) be invertible in B.
c) For every , let be the unique element (cf. b)) such that for every . Show that is an A-automorphism of B. One says that the Frobenius algebra B is symmetric if is an inner automorphism of B; there is then a Frobenius homomorphism of B into A for which is the identity (cf. b)). It amounts to the same thing to say that the (B, B)-bimodules B and (which is written B*) are isomorphic (exerc. 2 c)).
d) Let E be a left b-module of finite length, E’ its dual, E’* the dual of E’ considered as vector space over A; E’* is endowed with a structure of left B-module by putting, for , , , (Chapter III, 2nd ed., App. II, No. 7). For every , let (or simply ) be the element of E’* such that for every ; now prove that is a semilinear bijection for the automorphism , of the left B-module E onto the left B-module E’* (use Exercise 10 of Chapter VIII, § 4). For , one has (with the notations of Exercise 2 b)) for every .
4) a) Let G be a finite group. Show that the algebra B of the group G over any commutative field A is a symmetric Frobenius algebra (Exercise 3). (Consider the mapping of B into A which associates, with every element , the element , e denoting the identity element of G).
b) Let E be a finite-dimensional vector space of dimension over a commutative field A, and B the exterior algebra . Show that B is a Frobenius algebra. (If is a basis of E, consider the mapping which associates, with every element of B, the coefficient of in the expression of using the basis of B corresponding to ). For the Frobenius algebra B to be symmetric, it is necessary and sufficient that be even or A be of characteristic 2.
¶ 5) a) Show that the tensor product of two Frobenius algebras (resp. Frobenius and symmetric algebras) of finite rank over a commutative field K is a Frobenius algebra (resp. Frobenius and symmetric) (cf. § 1, No. 9, Prop. 9).
b) Let B be an algebra of finite rank over K, L an extension of K of finite degree over K. Show that if the algebra over L is Frobenius (resp. Frobenius and symmetric), the same is true of B. (Use Exercises 2 c) and 3 c) above and Exercise 2 of Chapter VIII, § 2).
6) Show that every absolutely semisimple algebra B of finite rank over a commutative field A is a symmetric Frobenius algebra. (Reduce to the case where B is simple; use Exercise 5 b) above, as well as Proposition 9 of Chapter VIII, § 12, No. 3).