Bourbaki

Exercise 4, § 7

Algebra, X, p. 198

It is set in small type as supplementary.

Let g\mathfrak{g} be a kk-Lie algebra, MM a g\mathfrak{g}-module. An extension of g\mathfrak{g} by MM is an exact sequence of kk-modules

0→M→ih→pg→00\to M\xrightarrow{i}\mathfrak{h}\xrightarrow{p}\mathfrak{g}\to0
where h\mathfrak{h} is a kk-Lie algebra, pp a homomorphism of Lie algebras, and where i(ρ(H)m)=[H,i(m)]i(\rho(H)m)=[H,i(m)] for H∈h,m∈MH\in\mathfrak{h},m\in M. Two extensions

0→M→ih→pg→0,0→M→i′h′→p′g→00\to M\xrightarrow{i}\mathfrak{h}\xrightarrow{p}\mathfrak{g}\to0,\qquad 0\to M\xrightarrow{i'}\mathfrak{h}'\xrightarrow{p'}\mathfrak{g}\to0

are said to be equivalent if there exists a homomorphism u:h→h′u:\mathfrak{h}\to\mathfrak{h}' such that p′∘u=p, u∘i=i′p'\circ u=p,\ u\circ i=i'. We denote by Liex(g,M)Lie_x(\mathfrak{g},M) the set of equivalence classes of extensions of g\mathfrak{g} by MM. We suppose that g\mathfrak{g} is a free kk-module.

a) Let (E):0→M→h→pg→0(\mathscr{E}):0\to M\to\mathfrak{h}\xrightarrow{p}\mathfrak{g}\to0 be an extension of g\mathfrak{g} by MM; choose a kk-linear section s:g→hs:\mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{h} of pp. We define an element f∈C2(g,M)f\in C^2(\mathfrak{g},M) (X, p. 196, exercise 28, b)) by putting

i(f(x,y))=[s(x),s(y)]−s([x,y])for x,y∈g. i(f(x,y))=[s(x),s(y)]-s([x,y])\qquad\text{for }x,y\in\mathfrak{g}.

Prove that ff is a 22-cocycle and that its class in H2(g,M)H^2(\mathfrak{g},M) does not depend on the choice of ss; it is denoted by θ(E)\theta(\mathscr{E}).

b) Prove that θ\theta defines a bijection of Liex(g,M)Lie_x(\mathfrak{g},M) onto H2(g,M)H^2(\mathfrak{g},M). Describe directly the group structure on Liex(g,M)Lie_x(\mathfrak{g},M) obtained by transport by γ\gamma.

c) Let U be the enveloping algebra of g, M(π)M_{(\pi)} the (U, U)-bimodule associated to M by means of the augmentation π:U→k\pi : U \to k (X, p. 196, exercise 27). Let 0→M(π)→B→ρU→00 \to M_{(\pi)} \to B \xrightarrow{\rho} U \to 0 be an extension of U by M(π)M_{(\pi)} (exercise 1); denote by b the set of elements b of B such that p(b)∈j(g)p(b) \in j(g). Prove that b is a kk-Lie algebra, an extension of g by M. This construction defines a mapping λ:Exk(U,M(π))→Liex(g,M)\lambda : Ex_k(U, M_{(\pi)}) \to Liex(g, M). Prove that the diagram

Exk(U,M(π))→λLiex(g,M)↓c↓γH2(U,M(π))→φ2H2(g,M) \begin{array}{ccc} Ex_k(U, M_{(\pi)}) & \xrightarrow{\lambda} & Liex(g, M) \\ \downarrow^c & & \downarrow^{\gamma} \\ H^2(U, M_{(\pi)}) & \xrightarrow{\varphi^2} & H^2(g, M) \end{array}

(where φ2\varphi^2 is the isomorphism defined in X, p. 196, exercise 27) is commutative. Deduce that λ\lambda is an isomorphism. \*

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.