Bourbaki

Exercise 9, § 9

Algebra, X, p. 207

Let A be a ring, M an A-module, k an integer ≥1\geq 1. One says that a family x of elements of A is k-secant for M if one has Hi(x,M)=0H_i(x, M) = 0 for 1≤i≤k1 \leq i \leq k. A family x is therefore completely secant if and only if it is k-secant for every k≥1k \geq 1. a) Let 0→M′→M→M′′→00 \to M' \to M \to M'' \to 0 be an exact sequence of A-modules. Now prove that if the family x is k-secant for M’ and M”, it is so for M. b) If x is k-secant for M and if N is a flat A-module, x is k-secant for M⊗ANM \otimes_A N. c) Let a1,...,ana_1, ..., a_n be integers ≥1\geq 1. Now prove that a sequence (x1,...,xn)(x_1, ..., x_n) is k-secant for M if and only if the same is true of the sequence (x1a1,...,xnan)(x_1^{a_1}, ..., x_n^{a_n}). d) For every pair of integers k,nk, n with 1≤k<n1 \leq k < n, give an example of a ring A, of an A-module M and of a sequence (x1,...,xn)(x_1, ..., x_n) of elements of A which is k-secant but not (k+1)(k+1)-secant for M (use X, p. 159, remark 4).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6. Not checked by a person.