Bourbaki

Exercise 12, § 4

Topological Vector Spaces, V, p. 77

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let EE be a real Hilbert space, VV a closed convex cone in EE, with vertex 0, V∘V^\circ the polar cone of VV (in EE, canonically identified with its dual). a) Now prove that every point x∈Ex \in E can be written in a unique way in the form x=x+−x−x = x_+ - x_- where x+∈Vx_+ \in V and x−∈V∘x_- \in V^\circ, and ⟨x+∣x−⟩=0\langle x_+|x_- \rangle = 0. b) For every face FF of VV (II, p. 92, exerc. 3), FF is reduced to 0 or is a convex cone with vertex 0; the set of the y∈V∘y \in V^\circ which are orthogonal to FF is a closed face F′F' of V∘V^\circ (but it is not the “dual face” of FF in the sense of II, p. 93, exerc. 6, the latter being empty). c) Take for EE the set of Hilbert-Schmidt endomorphisms of a real Hilbert space HH, and for VV the set of positive elements in EE. Now prove that one has V∘=VV^\circ = V and interpret in this case the result of a) (use cor. 1 of V, p. 56 to see that V⊂V∘V \subset V^\circ). d) The hypotheses being those of c), let v∈Vv \in V; the set LL of the x∈Hx \in H such that ⟨v(x)∣x⟩=0\langle v(x)|x \rangle = 0 or, equivalently, v(x)=0v(x) = 0 (V, p. 76, exerc. 10) is a closed vector subspace of HH, and the face FF of vv in VV is the closed set of the u∈Vu \in V such that u(x)=0u(x) = 0 for all x∈Lx \in L; it is identified with the cone of positive Hilbert-Schmidt endomorphisms of the Hilbert space L∘L^\circ. Deduce that the projection of EE onto the convex set FF (V, p. 11) is identical with the orthogonal projector of EE onto the closed vector subspace of EE generated by FF.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.