Topological Vector Spaces, V, p. 75
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
a) The notations being those of Exer. 6, now prove that, in order that M+N∘ be closed, it is necessary and sufficient that M+N∘=(M∘∩N)∘. b) Now prove that the following properties are equivalent: α) ε(M,N)<1; β) M+N∘ is closed in E ; γ) If M~ is the orthogonal supplement of M∩N∘ in M and (N∘)∼ that of M∩N∘ in N∘, E is direct sum of M∘∩N, M∩N∘, M~ and (N∘)∼. Moreover, if R and S are the projectors of E onto M~ and (N∘)∼ respectively corresponding to this decomposition, one has ∥R∥=∥S∥=(1−ε2(M,N))1/2. (To see that α) implies β) first remark that if x∈M~ and y∈(N∘)∼ one has ∣⟨x∣y⟩∣≤ε(M,N)∥x∥.∥y∥; let then u=x+y+t be the decomposition of an element u∈M+N∘ with x∈M, y∈(N∘)∼ and t∈M∩N∘, deduce that ∥x∥≤(1−ε2(M,N))−1/2∥u∥, ∥y∥≤(1−ε2(M,N))−1/2∥u∥ and ∥t∥≤∥u∥. To prove that γ) implies α), consider, for a v∈M~, the decomposition v=v1+v2, where v1 is the orthogonal projection of v onto N, supplement of N∩M∘ in N ; one has R.v1=v, and if one had ε(M,N)=1, there would exist a sequence (vn)∈M~ such that ∥vn∥=1 and that ∥(vn)1∥ tends to 0. Now prove that the restriction R1 of R to N~ is a bijection of N~ onto M~; to calculate ∥R∥, now prove that ∥R1−1∥≤(1−ε2(M,N))1/2.) c) Deduce from b) that if M+N∘ is closed, the same is true of M∘+N.