Bourbaki

Exercise 26, § 1

Integration, VII

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let GG be a locally compact group, μ\mu a left Haar measure on GG, kk an integer ≥1\geq 1, AA an integrable set. Now prove that, for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists a neighbourhood UU of ee in GG having the following property: for every finite subset SS of kk elements in UU, the set of s∈Gs \in G such that sS⊂AsS \subset A has measure ≥(1−ε)μ(A)\geq (1 - \varepsilon) \mu(A). (Reduce to the case where AA is compact and take UU such that

μ(AU)≤(1+εk−1)μ(A). \mu(AU) \leq \left( 1 + \frac{\varepsilon}{k-1} \right) \mu(A).

For every finite subset HH of GG, put p(H)=Card(H)p(H) = \mathrm{Card}(H) and q(H)=1q(H) = 1 if H≠∅H \neq \varnothing, q(H)=0q(H) = 0 if H=∅H = \varnothing; by evaluating the integrals

∫Gp(A∩sS)dsand∫Gq(A∩sS)ds, \int_G p(A \cap sS) ds \quad \text{and} \quad \int_G q(A \cap sS) ds,

prove that if, for h≤kh \leq k, one denotes by MhM_h the set of the s∈Gs \in G for which Card(A∩sS)=h\mathrm{Card}(A \cap sS) = h, one has

∑h=1khμ(Mh)=k⋅μ(A)and∑h=1kμ(Mh)≤μ(AU). \sum_{h=1}^{k} h \mu(M_h) = k \cdot \mu(A) \quad \text{and} \quad \sum_{h=1}^{k} \mu(M_h) \leq \mu(AU).

Conclude that ∑h=1k−1hμ(Mh)≤kε⋅μ(A)\sum_{h=1}^{k-1} h \mu(M_h) \leq k \varepsilon \cdot \mu(A).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.