Bourbaki

Exercise 27, § 1

Integration, VII

Let GG be a group operating on a set XX. A subset PP (resp. CC) of XX is called a GG-packing (resp. GG-covering) if, for every s≠es \neq e in GG, one has sP∩P=∅sP \cap P = \varnothing (resp. if X=⋃s∈GsCX = \bigcup_{s \in G} sC).

A GG-tiling is called a subset PP which is at the same time a GG-packing and a GG-covering.

a) Suppose that XX is locally compact, that GG is countable, operates continuously in XX, and that there exists a non-zero positive measure μ\mu on XX invariant under GG. Let PP and CC be a GG-packing and a GG-covering which are μ\mu-integrable. Now prove that μ(C)≥μ(P)\mu(C) \geq \mu(P). (Remark that μ(C)≥∑s∈Gμ(C∩sP)\mu(C) \geq \sum_{s \in G} \mu(C \cap sP)).

b) Suppose in addition that there exists on XX a uniform structure compatible with the topology of XX and admitting a fundamental system G\mathscr{G} of open entourages invariant under GG. Let Δ(G)\Delta(G) denote on the other hand the greatest lower bound of the numbers μ(C)\mu(C) for all integrable GG-coverings C of GG. Let V be an entourage belonging to G\mathscr{G}, and let a∈Xa \in X be such that μ(V(a))>Δ(G)\mu(V(a)) > \Delta(G); now prove that there exists s∈Gs \in G such that s≠es \neq e and (a,sa)∈V−1∘V(a, sa) \in V^{-1} \circ V.

c) Suppose that XX is a locally compact group, μ\mu a left Haar measure, GG a countable subgroup of XX operating by left translation. With the same definition of Δ(G)\Delta(G) as in b), now prove that, if A is an integrable subset of X such that μ(A)>Δ(G)\mu(A) > \Delta(G), there exists s∈G∩AA−1s \in G \cap AA^{-1} such that s≠es \neq e. Particular case where X=RnX = \mathbf{R}^n, and where G is a discrete subgroup of rank n in Rn\mathbf{R}^n: Δ(G)\Delta(G) is then equal to the absolute value of the determinant of a basis of G over Z\mathbf{Z} with respect to the canonical basis of Rn\mathbf{R}^n; if A is a symmetric convex field in Rn\mathbf{R}^n such that μ(A)≥2nΔ(G)\mu(A) \geq 2^n \Delta(G), now prove that there exists a point of A∩GA \cap G distinct from 0 (« Minkowski theorem »).

d) The hypotheses being those of a), let f be a function ≥0\geq 0 and μ\mu-integrable in X. Now prove that there exist two points a,ba, b of X such that μ(C)∑s∈Gf(sa)≥∫Xf(x)dμ(x)\mu(C) \sum_{s \in G} f(sa) \geq \int_X f(x) d\mu(x) and μ(P)∑s∈Gf(sb)≤∫Xf(x)dμ(x)\mu(P) \sum_{s \in G} f(sb) \leq \int_X f(x) d\mu(x). (Observe that if g is an integrable function ≥0\geq 0, E an μ\mu-integrable set in X, there exists c∈Ec \in E such that ∫Eg(x)dμ(x)≤g(c)μ(E)\int_E g(x) d\mu(x) \leq g(c) \mu(E), and c′∈Ec' \in E such that ∫Eg(x)dμ(x)≥g(c′)μ(E)\int_E g(x) d\mu(x) \geq g(c') \mu(E)).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.