Exercise 24, § 9
General Topology, I
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
(a) Now prove that in a countable absolutely closed space X, the set of isolated points is everywhere dense. (Reason by contradiction, by arranging the points of X in a sequence, and forming by recurrence a countable open covering of X such that no finite union of the is a covering of X). b) Give an example of a completely separated absolutely closed space which is not a Lindelöf space (in the product , consider the complements of the sets , where A runs through the set of subsets of , and apply the general method of I, p. 103, exerc. 20 c)). This space satisfies the property (D{II}) of I, p. 90, exerc. 7, but not the property (D_{III}). c) Let be a compact space without isolated point, the set of complements of the countable subsets of , the sets of being therefore everywhere dense (cf. a)). Let be the topology generated by the open sets of and the sets of . Now prove that the space X obtained by endowing with the topology is absolutely closed, completely separated, and is a Lindelöf space not satisfying the condition (D_{II}) of exerc. 7 of I, p. 90, and in which no point has a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods and no infinite sequence whose terms are all distinct has a value of adherence. If in every open subspace is a Lindelöf space (cf. I, p. 107, exerc. 16 c)), every open subspace of X is a Lindelöf space and in particular X satisfies (D_{III}) (I, p. 107, exerc. 16 a)). This is so when ; but now prove that in this case there are countable closed subsets of X which are not countable intersections of open sets of X (cf. IX, § 5, n° 3).*
Solution
No solution has been written yet.