Bourbaki

Exercise 24, § 9

General Topology, I

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

(a) Now prove that in a countable absolutely closed space X, the set of isolated points is everywhere dense. (Reason by contradiction, by arranging the points of X in a sequence, and forming by recurrence a countable open covering (U‾n)(\overline{U}_n) of X such that no finite union of the U‾n\overline{U}_n is a covering of X). b) Give an example of a completely separated absolutely closed space which is not a Lindelöf space (in the product [0,1]×[0,1][0, 1] \times [0, 1], consider the complements of the sets A×{0}A \times \{0\}, where A runs through the set of subsets of [0,1][0, 1], and apply the general method of I, p. 103, exerc. 20 c)). This space satisfies the property (D{II}) of I, p. 90, exerc. 7, but not the property (D_{III}). c) Let X0X_0 be a compact space without isolated point, M\mathfrak{M} the set of complements of the countable subsets of X0X_0, the sets of M\mathfrak{M} being therefore everywhere dense (cf. a)). Let T\mathfrak{T} be the topology generated by the open sets of X0X_0 and the sets of M\mathfrak{M}. Now prove that the space X obtained by endowing X0X_0 with the topology T\mathfrak{T} is absolutely closed, completely separated, and is a Lindelöf space not satisfying the condition (D_{II}) of exerc. 7 of I, p. 90, and in which no point has a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods and no infinite sequence whose terms are all distinct has a value of adherence. If in X0X_0 every open subspace is a Lindelöf space (cf. I, p. 107, exerc. 16 c)), every open subspace of X is a Lindelöf space and in particular X satisfies (D_{III}) (I, p. 107, exerc. 16 a)). This is so when X0={0,1}X_0 = \{0, 1\}; but now prove that in this case there are countable closed subsets of X which are not countable intersections of open sets of X (cf. IX, § 5, n° 3).*

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6. Not checked by a person.