Bourbaki

Exercise 8, § 3

General Topology, IX, p. 100

One says that a mapping ww of a ring A into R+\mathbf{R}_+ is a semi-absolute value on A if it satisfies the conditions 1: 1°: w(0)=0w(0) = 0; 2° w(x−y)≤w(x)+w(y)w(x - y) \leq w(x) + w(y); 3° w(xy)≤w(x)w(y)w(xy) \leq w(x)w(y). The semi-absolute value ww is said to be separated if w(x)=0w(x) = 0 implies x=0x = 0. If ww is a separated semi-absolute value on A, w(x−y)w(x - y) is an invariant distance on the additive group A, and consequently defines a topology compatible with the additive group structure of A; now prove that this topology is compatible with the ring structure of A. Generalize to rings provided with a semi-absolute value the principal properties of normed algebras, in particular prop. 14 (IX, p. 40).

If ww is a non-separated semi-absolute value on A, the set w(0)−1w(0)^{-1} is a two-sided ideal aa in A; if A is provided with the topology defined by the distance w(x−y)w(x - y), it is compatible with the ring structure of A, and the associated separated space of A is none other than the quotient ring A/aA/a, on which the function w‾(xˉ)\overline{w}(\bar{x}), equal for every class xˉ\bar{x} mod. aa to the common value of w(x)w(x) for all the x∈xˉx \in \bar{x}, is a separated semi-absolute value, said to be associated with ww, defining the quotient topology of that of A by aa.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.