Bourbaki

Exercise 9, § 3

General Topology, IX, p. 100

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

a) On a ring A, two absolute semi-values w1,w2w_1, w_2 are said to be equivalent if the distances w1(x−y),w2(x−y)w_1(x - y), w_2(x - y) are equivalent. Now prove that, if ww is an absolute semi-value on A, awaw and w1/aw^{1/a} are absolute semi-values equivalent to ww for every number a≥1a \geq 1.

b) If wi(1≤i≤n)w_i (1 \leq i \leq n) are absolute semi-values on a ring A, the functions w=∑iwiw = \sum_i w_i and w′=sup⁡iwiw' = \sup_i w_i are two absolute semi-values equivalent on A. If ai=wi−1(0)a_i = w_i^{-1}(0) and a=w(0)a = w(0), we have a=⋂iaia = \bigcap_i a_i. If AiA_i denotes the completion of the quotient ring A/aiA/a_i endowed with the separated absolute semi-value associated with wiw_i, now prove that A/aA/a, endowed with the separated absolute semi-value associated with ww, is isomorphic to a subring of the product ring ∏iAi\prod_i A_i; for this subring to be everywhere dense in ∏iAi\prod_i A_i, it is necessary and sufficient (assuming that A has a unit element 1) that the absolute semi-values wiw_i satisfy the following condition: for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, and for each of the indices ii, there exists an element x∈Ax \in A such that wi(1−x)≤εw_i(1 - x) \leq \varepsilon and wk(x)≤εw_k(x) \leq \varepsilon for every index k≠ik \neq i.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.