Bourbaki

Exercise 20, § 4

General Topology, IX, p. 105

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

For every covering R\mathscr{R} of a topological space XX, we denote by VRV_{\mathscr{R}} the union of the sets U×UU \times U, where UU runs through R\mathscr{R}. A covering R\mathscr{R} of XX is said to be uniform if there exists a neighbourhood WW of the diagonal Δ\Delta of X×XX \times X such that the covering formed by the W(x)W(x), where xx runs through XX, is finer than R\mathscr{R}. A covering R\mathscr{R} is said to be divisible if there exists a neighbourhood WW of Δ\Delta in X×XX \times X such that W⊂VRW \subset V_{\mathscr{R}}.

a) Prove that every uniform open covering of XX is divisible (cf. IX, p. 107, exerc. 26 b)).

b) Let R\mathscr{R} be an open covering of XX such that there exists a locally finite closed covering S\mathscr{S} of XX, finer than R\mathscr{R}. Prove that the covering R\mathscr{R} is uniform. (For every set A∈SA \in \mathscr{S}, let UAU_A be a set of R\mathscr{R} containing AA and let VAV_A be the union in X×XX \times X of the open sets UA×UAU_A \times U_A and (X−A)×(X−A)(X - A) \times (X - A); consider the set W=⋂A∈SVAW = \bigcap_{A \in \mathscr{S}} V_A).

c) Let XX be a completely regular space; a covering R\mathscr{R} of XX is said to be normal if VRV_{\mathscr{R}} is an entourage of the universal uniform structure Uω\mathscr{U}_\omega (IX, p. 86, exerc. 10) of XX; it is equivalent to saying that there exists a continuous distance dd on X×XX \times X, such that the set of the (x,y)∈X×X(x, y) \in X \times X such that d(x,y)<1d(x, y) < 1 is contained in VRV_{\mathscr{R}}. There then exists an infinite sequence (Rn)(\mathscr{R}_n) of coverings of XX such that R1=R\mathscr{R}_1 = \mathscr{R} and VRn+12⊂VRnV_{\mathscr{R}_{n+1}}^2 \subset V_{\mathscr{R}_n} for every nn; in particular, every normal open covering is uniform.

d) Let XX be a completely regular space, and let (U,V)(U, V) be an open covering of XX (such a covering is said to be binary). In order that (U,V)(U, V) be a divisible covering, it is necessary and sufficient that, if one sets A=X−U,B=X−VA = X - U, B = X - V, there exist two disjoint open sets S,TS, T such that A⊂SA \subset S and B⊂TB \subset T. In order that (U,V)(U, V) be a normal covering, it is necessary and sufficient that AA and BB be normally separated (IX, p. 103, exerc. 15). Deduce that for every x∈Xx \in X and every open neighbourhood UU of xx, there exists an open neighbourhood VV of xx such that V‾⊂U\overline{V} \subset U and that (U,X−V‾)(U, X - \overline{V}) be a normal covering of XX.

e) In order that a completely regular space XX be Weierstrassian (IX, p. 88, exerc. 20), it is necessary and sufficient that every normal open covering of XX contain a finite covering (use IX, p. 89, exerc. 20 d)).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.