Bourbaki

Exercise 6, § 2

Tag 026T, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 026T].

Spectral Theories, I, p. 156

Let k⩾1k\geqslant 1 be an integer. For every integer N⩾1N\geqslant 1, denote by Sk(N)S_k(N) the largest cardinal of a set A⊂{1,...,N}A\subset \{1, . . . ,N\} which does not contain kk elements in arithmetic progression, that is to say that, whatever n0⩾0,h⩾1n_0\geqslant 0,h\geqslant 1, ℓ⩾1\ell \geqslant 1, if {n0+h,n0+2h,...,n0+ℓh}⊂A\{n_0+h, n_0+ 2h, . . . , n_0+\ell h\} \subset A, then ℓ<k\ell < k.

a) Now prove that the limit

sk=s_k= limN→+∞Sk(N)N_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\frac{S_k(N)}{N}

exists. b) Now prove that s1=s2=0s_1=s_2= 0. It can be shown (« Szemerédi theorem », cf. E. Szemerédi, On sets of integers containing no kk elements in arithmetic progression, Acta Arithmetica XXVII, 1975, 199–245) that sk=0s_k= 0 for every k⩾1k\geqslant 1 ; for the case k=3k= 3, cf. exercise 23 of II, p. 270.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6. Not checked by a person.