Bourbaki

Chapter II

Commutative locally compact groups

Throughout this chapter, the letter G denotes, unless otherwise mentioned, a commutative locally compact group endowed with a Haar measure generally denoted by dxdx; for p∈[1,+∞]p\in [1,+\infty ], the space Lp(G,dx)L^p(G, dx) will simply be denoted by Lp(G)L^p(G), and its norm will be denoted by f↦∥f∥pf\mapsto \|f\|_p. We identify L1(G)L^1(G) with a subspace of M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) by the canonical mapping f↦f⋅dxf\mapsto f\cdot dx. We recall that the support of the Haar measure is equal to G (INT, VII, §1, no1^o1, remark 3); in particular (INT, III, §2, no2^o2, proposition 9), the canonical mapping of the space K(G)\mathscr{K}(G) into Lp(G)L^p(G) is injective for p∈[1,+∞]p\in [1,+\infty ]. For p≠+∞p\not= +\infty, we shall identify Lp(G)L^p(G) with a subspace of the space F~(G;C)\widetilde{\mathscr{F}}(G;\mathbf{C}) of classes of complex-valued functions on G defined and finite almost everywhere (INT, IV, §3, no5^o5, no6^o6). In particular, the notation L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G) denotes the intersection of L1(G)L^1(G) and L2(G)L^2(G) in this space. We denote by f↦f~f\mapsto \widetilde{f} the involution on the involutive algebra L1(G)L^1(G) (example 4 of I, p. 99); we have f~(x)=f(x−1)‾\widetilde{f}(x) =\overline{f(x^{-1})} for every xx in G.

We recall (INT, V, §5, no3^o3, th. 1) that if μ\mu is a complex measure on a locally compact topological space X and if ff is a locally μ\mu-integrable function on X, then the measure ν\nu of density ff with respect to μ\mu is denoted by f⋅μf\cdot \mu or also fμf \mu. A function gg of X into C\mathbf{C} is essentially integrable for the measure ν\nu if, and only if, gfgf is essentially integrable for μ\mu; one then has

(f⋅μ)(g)=∫Xgd(f⋅μ)=∫Xgfdμ=μ(gf) (f\cdot \mu)(g) =\int_Xgd(f\cdot \mu) =\int_Xgf d\mu=\mu(gf)

If G is a compact topological group, the normalized Haar measure on G is called the unique Haar measure μ\mu on G such that μ(G)=1\mu(G) = 1.

If X is a discrete topological space, the counting measure on X is called the discrete measure μ\mu on X such that μ({x})=1\mu(\{x\}) = 1 for every x∈Xx\in X. If G is a discrete topological group, the counting measure on G is a Haar measure on G.

We shall also make use of the following two lemmas.

Lemma 1. — Let X be a locally compact topological space and μ\mu a positive measure on X. Let xx be an element of the support of μ\mu. Let U be an open neighbourhood of xx. There exists a function f∈K+(X)f\in \mathscr{K}_+(X) whose support is contained in U such that ∫fdμ=1\int f d\mu= 1.

By definition of the support of a measure (INT, III, §2, no2^o2, def. 1), there exists a function g∈K(X)g\in \mathscr{K}(X) with support contained in U such that μ(g)≠0\mu(g)\not= 0. We then have μ(∣g∣)>0\mu(|g|)>0 since μ\mu is positive, and the function f=μ(∣g∣)−1∣g∣f=\mu(|g|)^{-1}|g| has the desired properties.

Lemma 2. — Let G and H be topological groups with neutral elements eGe_G and eHe_H; suppose that the topological group G is separated. Let ff be a homomorphism of topological groups from G into H. Suppose that for every neighbourhood U of eGe_G in G, there exists a neighbourhood W of eHe_H in H such that f−1(W)⊂U\overset{-1}{f}(W)\subset U. Then, the homomorphism ff is injective and strict (TG, III, p. 16, def. 1).

The hypotheses imply that Ker(ff) is contained in every neighbourhood of eGe_G in G, hence that Ker(ff) ={eG}=\{e_G\} since G is separated. The homomorphism from G into f(G)f(G) deduced from ff by passing to the subspaces is then bijective; denote by g:f(G)→Gg:f(G)\rightarrow G the reciprocal homomorphism. The hypotheses then imply that gg is continuous at eHe_H, hence continuous (TG, III, p. 15, prop. 23).

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.