Bourbaki

§ 1. Fourier transform

1. Unitary characters of a locally compact commutative group

Definition 1 02HQ

A continuous homomorphism of G into the multiplicative group U\mathbf{U} of complex numbers of modulus 1 is called a unitary character of G.

In other words, a unitary character is a continuous complex-valued function χ\chi on G such that:

χ(xy)=χ(x)χ(y),∣χ(x)∣=1(x,y∈G) \chi (xy) =\chi (x)\chi (y),|\chi (x)|= 1(x, y\in G)

In this chapter, we shall often say simply "character" instead of "unitary character".

Let E be a Hilbert space of dimension 1, and let χ\chi be a unitary character of G. The mapping which to x∈Gx\in G associates the homothety of ratio χ(x)\chi (x) in E is a continuous isometric linear representation of G in E. Conversely, every bounded continuous linear representation of G in E is obtained by this process, and in particular is unitary.

It is immediate that the product of two unitary characters, the inverse of a unitary character, and the constant function equal to 1 are unitary characters. Hence the set G^\widehat{G} of unitary characters of G is a group for multiplication. This group is commutative. On the other hand, the mapping (χ1,χ2)↦χ1χ2−1=χ1χ‾2(\chi_1, \chi_2)\mapsto \chi_1\chi^{-1}_2=\chi_1\overline{\chi}_2 is continuous for the topology of compact convergence, and G^\widehat{G} endowed with the topology of compact convergence is a topological group (TG, X, p. 6, Corollary 2 and Remark 1).

Definition 2 02HR

The topological group G^\widehat{G} is called the dual group of G.

Since G is locally compact, the mapping (x,χ)↦χ(x)(x, \chi )\mapsto \chi (x) is continuous on G×G^G\times \widehat{G} (TG, X, p. 28, th. 3).

Recall that M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) denotes the unital involutive Banach algebra of bounded complex measures on G (Example 4 of I, p. 99). For every bounded complex measure μ∈M1(G)\mu\in \mathscr{M}^1(G) and every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, we write

χ(μ)=∫Gχ(x)dμ(x)(1) \chi (\mu) =\int_G\chi (x)d\mu(x) \tag{1}

(cf. INT, VIII, §2, Noo6^o6).

Lemma 1 02HS

For every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, the mapping μ↦χ(μ)\mu\mapsto \chi (\mu) is a hermitian character of the involutive Banach algebra M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G).

By INT, VIII, §3, Noo3^o3, Prop. 11, the mapping μ↦χ(μ)\mu\mapsto \chi (\mu) is a character of the involutive Banach algebra M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G). Further, we have:

χ(μ∗)=∫Gχ(x−1)dμ(x)=∫Gχ(x)‾dμ(x)=χ(μ)‾ \chi (\mu^*) =\int_G\chi (x^{-1})d\mu(x) =\int_G\overline{\chi(x)}d\mu(x) =\overline{\chi(\mu)}

and therefore this character is hermitian.

Thus we have defined a mapping of G^\widehat{G} into X(M1(G))\mathsf{X}(\mathscr{M}^1(G)); it will be called canonical.

Let χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}. The restriction of μ↦χ(μ)\mu\mapsto \chi (\mu) to L1(G)L^1(G) is non-zero (cf. INT, VIII, §2, Noo7^o7, Prop. 10). By restriction to the involutive Banach subalgebra L1(G)L^1(G), we therefore obtain a mapping of G^\widehat{G} into X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)), called canonical. It associates to χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} the hermitian character

f↦χ(f)=χ(f⋅dx)=∫Gf(x)χ(x)dx(f∈L1(G))(2) f\mapsto \chi (f) =\chi (f\cdot dx) =\int_Gf(x)\chi (x)dx(f\in L^1(G)) \tag{2}

of L1(G)L^1(G).

Proposition 1 02HT

The canonical mapping of G^\widehat{G} into X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) is a homeomorphism.

Let us denote this canonical mapping by ev and, for χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, let us denote by evχ_{\chi} the image of the character χ\chi under ev, that is to say, the hermitian character f↦χ(f)f\mapsto \chi (f) of L1(G)L^1(G). Considered as a mapping of G^\widehat{G} into the dual of L1(G)L^1(G), the mapping ev is the composite of the injection of G^\widehat{G} into L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G), endowed with the weak topology σ(L∞(G),L1(G))\sigma (L^{\infty}(G),L^1(G)), and the injection of L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) into the dual of L1(G)L^1(G), endowed with the topology of simple convergence. Since G^\widehat{G} is a bounded subset of L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G), the first mapping is continuous by the Lebesgue theorem (INT, IV, §3, Noo7^o7, Th. 6). The second is likewise continuous, by definition. This proves that the mapping ev is continuous.

If χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} and if f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G), we have evχ(εx∗f)=χ(x_{\chi}(\varepsilon_x*f) =\chi (x)evχ(f)_{\chi}(f). Taking ff such that evχ(f)≠0_{\chi}(f)\not= 0, we deduce that the mapping ev is injective.

Let ζ∈X(L1(G))\zeta \in \mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) and let f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) be such that ζ(f)≠0\zeta (f)\not= 0. Define a mapping χ:G→C\chi : G\rightarrow \mathbf{C} by putting, for x∈Gx\in G:

χ(x)=ζ(εx∗f)ζ(f)(3) \chi (x) =\frac{\zeta(\varepsilon_x*f)}{\zeta(f)} \tag{3}

We have χ(e)=1\chi (e) = 1. Since the mapping x↦εx∗f=γ(x)(f)x\mapsto \varepsilon_x*f=\boldsymbol{\gamma }(x)(f) of G into L1(G)L^1(G) is continuous (INT, VIII, §2, no5^o5, Proposition 8), the mapping χ\chi is continuous. It is bounded because, for every x∈Gx\in G, we have

∣χ(x)∣⩽∥εx∗f∥∣ζ(f)∣=∥f∥∣ζ(f)∣ |\chi (x)|\leqslant \frac{\|\varepsilon_x*f\|}{|\zeta(f)|}=\frac{\|f\|}{|\zeta(f)|}

(Theorem 1 of I, p. 29 and INT, VIII, loc. cit.).

Now let B\mathfrak{B} be a basis of the filter of neighbourhoods of ee consisting of compact neighbourhoods. For every V∈BV\in \mathfrak{B}, let gVg_V be a positive continuous function, zero outside V and of integral equal to 1 (Lemma 1 of II, p. 200). For every function h∈L1(G)h\in L^1(G), one then has

εx∗h=\varepsilon_x*h= limV,B(εx∗h)∗gV=_{V,\mathfrak{B}}(\varepsilon_x*h)*g_V= limV,B(εx∗gV∗h)_{V,\mathfrak{B}}(\varepsilon_x*g_V*h),

in L1(G)L^1(G), the limit being taken with respect to the filter of sections of B\mathfrak{B} (INT, VIII, §4, no7^o7, Proposition 20). In particular, since ζ(εx∗gV∗f)=\zeta (\varepsilon_x*g_V*f) = ζ(εx∗gV)ζ(f)\zeta (\varepsilon_x*g_V)\zeta (f), it follows that

χ(x)=\chi (x) = limV,Bζ(εx∗gV)_{V,\mathfrak{B}}\zeta (\varepsilon_x*g_V).

For every h∈L1(G)h\in L^1(G), we obtain

ζ(εx∗h)=\zeta (\varepsilon_x*h) = limV,Bζ(εx∗gV∗h)=ζ(h)_{V,\mathfrak{B}}\zeta (\varepsilon_x*g_V*h) =\zeta (h) limV,Bζ(εx∗gV)=χ(x)ζ(h)_{V,\mathfrak{B}}\zeta (\varepsilon_x*g_V) =\chi (x)\zeta (h).

Consequently, for x,y∈Gx, y\in G we have:

χ(xy)=ζ(εx∗εy∗f)ζ(f)=χ(x)ζ(εy∗f)ζ(f)=χ(x)χ(y) \chi (xy) =\frac{\zeta(\varepsilon_x*\varepsilon_y*f)}{\zeta(f)}=\frac{\chi(x)\zeta(\varepsilon_y*f)}{\zeta(f)}=\chi (x)\chi (y)

which proves that χ\chi is a homomorphism of G into C∗\mathbf{C}^*. Since χ\chi is bounded and continuous, it is a unitary character of G. Moreover, if g∈L1(G)g\in L^1(G), we have

g∗f=∫G(εx∗f)g(x)dx g*f=\int_G(\varepsilon_x*f)g(x)dx

in L1(G)L^1(G) (INT, VIII, §1, no5^o5, Proposition 7), whence

ζ(g)ζ(f)=ζ(g∗f)=∫Gζ(εx∗f)g(x)dx \zeta (g)\zeta (f) =\zeta (g*f) =\int_G\zeta (\varepsilon_x*f)g(x)dx

=ζ(f)∫Gχ(x)g(x)dx==\zeta (f)\int_G\chi (x)g(x)dx= evχ(g)ζ(f)_{\chi}(g)\zeta (f) (INT, VI, §1, no1^o1, Proposition 1), which shows that ζ=\zeta = evχ_{\chi}. Consequently, ev is surjective, hence bijective.

Finally, let us show that the reciprocal mapping ev−1^{-1} is continuous. Let ζ∈X(L1(G))\zeta \in \mathsf{X}(L^1(G)). Let f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) be a function such that ζ(f)≠0\zeta (f)\not= 0. The set W of ξ∈X(L1(G))\xi \in \mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) such that ξ(f)≠0\xi (f)\not= 0 is an open neighbourhood of ζ\zeta in X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)). For every ξ∈W\xi \in W, what precedes shows that ev−1(ξ)^{-1}(\xi ) is the character

x↦ξ(εx∗f)ξ(f) x\mapsto \frac{\xi(\varepsilon_x*f)}{\xi(f)}

Let F\mathfrak{F} be a filter on W⊂X(L1(G))W\subset \mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) converging to ζ\zeta. Since the set X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) is bounded, hence equicontinuous, in L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G), the uniform structure of simple convergence coincides with the uniform structure of compact convergence (TG, X, p. 16, Theorem 1). Let K be a compact subset of G. The set of the εx∗f\varepsilon_x*f for x∈Kx\in K is compact in L1(G)L^1(G) (INT, VIII, §2, No.o5^o5, Proposition 8). We have therefore

limξ,Fξ(εx∗f)=ζ(εx∗f)_{\xi ,\mathfrak{F}}\xi (\varepsilon_x*f) =\zeta (\varepsilon_x*f)

uniformly for x∈Kx\in K. It follows that

limξ,F_{\xi ,\mathfrak{F}} ev−1(ξ)=^{-1}(\xi ) = ev−1(ζ)^{-1}(\zeta ),

hence ev−1^{-1} is continuous at ζ\zeta. This completes the proof of the proposition.

Henceforth we shall identify a unitary character χ\chi of G with the character f↦∫Gf(x)χ(x)dxf\mapsto \int_Gf(x)\chi (x)dx of L1(G)L^1(G).

Remark 1 02HU

The bijectivity of the mapping from G^\widehat{G} into X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) of Proposition 1 is a particular case of the correspondence between continuous representations of a locally compact group H (not necessarily commutative) and continuous representations of the algebra L1(H)L^1(H).

Remark 2 02HV

The canonical mapping from G^\widehat{G} into X(M1(G))\mathsf{X}(\mathscr{M}^1(G)) is not surjective in general (II, p. 308, exercise 14).

Corollary 1 02HW

Every character of L1(G)L^1(G) is hermitian. The canonical mapping from X\mathsf{X}(Stell(G)) (Definition 9 of I, p. 125) into X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) is a homeomorphism.

The first assertion follows from Proposition 1 and Lemma 1 by restriction to L1(G)L^1(G). The second follows from the first and from the corollary of Proposition 20 of I, p. 124.

Corollary 2 02HX

The topological group G^\widehat{G} is locally compact.

In fact, X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) is locally compact (corollary of Theorem 1 of I, p. 29).

We shall identify G^\widehat{G} with X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) and X\mathsf{X}(Stell(G)). For x∈Gx\in G and χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, we shall denote by ⟨χ,x⟩\langle \chi , x\rangle the complex number χ(x)\chi (x), which belongs to U\mathbf{U}.

We say that xx and χ\chi are orthogonal if ⟨χ,x⟩=1\langle \chi , x\rangle = 1. Let A be a subset of G (resp. of G^\widehat{G}); the set of elements of G^\widehat{G} (resp. of G) orthogonal to A is a closed subgroup of G^\widehat{G} (resp. of G), called the orthogonal of A and denoted by A⊥A^{\bot}. The orthogonal of G is reduced to ee.

For x∈Gx\in G, let us denote by η(x)\eta (x) the mapping of G^\widehat{G} into U\mathbf{U} defined by χ↦\chi \mapsto ⟨χ,x⟩\langle \chi , x\rangle. By definition of the multiplication in G^\widehat{G}, the mapping η(x)\eta (x) is a group homomorphism. It is continuous since the mapping (x,χ)↦⟨χ,x⟩(x, \chi )\mapsto \langle \chi , x\rangle of G×G^G\times \widehat{G} into U\mathbf{U} is continuous (TG, X, p. 28, th. 3). Thus we have defined a mapping η\eta, called canonical, of G into the bidual group G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}}; it is a group homomorphism. Moreover, the mapping η\eta is continuous (TG, X, p. 28, th. 3). We shall prove later (II, p. 220, th. 2) that η\eta is a group isomorphism of G onto G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}}.

Let G and H be locally compact commutative groups, and let φ:G→H\varphi : G\rightarrow H be a morphism of topological groups. For every χ∈H^\chi \in \widehat{H}, the mapping χ∘φ\chi \circ \varphi is a character of G, denoted by φ^(χ)\widehat{\varphi}(\chi ). This definition is expressed by the formula

⟨χ,φ(x)⟩=⟨φ^(χ),x⟩(4) \langle \chi , \varphi (x)\rangle =\langle \widehat{\varphi}(\chi ), x\rangle \tag{4}

for every χ∈H^\chi \in \widehat{H} and every x∈Gx\in G. It follows that φ^\widehat{\varphi} is a morphism of the topological group H^\widehat{H} into the topological group G^\widehat{G}; one says that φ^\widehat{\varphi} is the dual of the morphism φ\varphi.

Let K be a locally compact commutative group and let ψ:H→K\psi : H\rightarrow K be a morphism of topological groups. The definition shows that ψ^∘φ=φ^∘ψ^\widehat{\psi}\circ \varphi =\widehat{\varphi}\circ \widehat{\psi}. If φ\varphi is the identity mapping of G, then φ^\widehat{\varphi} is the identity mapping of G^\widehat{G}. In particular, if φ\varphi is a group isomorphism, the same is true of φ^\widehat{\varphi}, and φ^−1\widehat{\varphi}^{-1} is the dual of φ−1\varphi^{-1}.

Lemma 2 02HY

Let G and H be locally compact commutative groups and let f:H→Gf: H\rightarrow G be a morphism of topological groups. The kernel of f^\widehat{f} is the orthogonal of the image of ff.

By definition, we have χ∈\chi \in Ker(f^\widehat{f}) if and only if the restriction of χ\chi to the image of ff is trivial.

Proposition 2 02HZ

Let n⩾0n\geqslant 0 be an integer and let G1,...,GnG_1, . . . ,G_n be locally compact commutative groups. Let G be the product group of the groups GjG_j for 1⩽j⩽n1\leqslant j\leqslant n. For 1⩽j⩽n1\leqslant j\leqslant n, let λj\lambda_j be the injection of GjG_j into G which associates to x∈Gjx\in G_j the element (xk)(x_k) such that xk=ex_k=e if k≠jk\not=j and xj=xx_j=x. The mapping

(λ^j)1⩽j⩽n:G^→∏1⩽j⩽nG^j (\widehat{\lambda}_j)_{1\leqslant j\leqslant n}:\widehat{G}\rightarrow \prod_{1\leqslant j\leqslant n}\widehat{G}_j

is a group isomorphism.

Let mm be the product mapping of G^n\widehat{G}^n into G^\widehat{G}, and for every jj such that 1⩽j⩽n1\leqslant j\leqslant n, let πj\pi_j be the projection of G onto GjG_j. Let μ\mu be the morphism of topological groups m∘(π^j)jm\circ (\widehat{\pi}_j)_j from ∏G^j\prod\widehat{G}_j into G^\widehat{G}, such that

⟨μ((χj)),(xj)⟩=∏j=1n⟨χj,xj⟩ \langle \mu((\chi_j)),(x_j)\rangle =\prod_{j=1}^n\langle \chi_j, x_j\rangle

The mapping μ\mu is continuous, and one verifies that μ\mu and (λ^j)(\widehat{\lambda}_j) are reciprocal bijections of one another. The proposition follows.

Remark 02I0

The calculation of the dual group of an infinite product of commutative compact groups is the object of Corollary 4 of II, p. 234 below. The case of a commutative locally compact group which is an arbitrary product of locally compact groups follows from these two statements, since in such a product, all the factors except a finite number are compact (TG, I, p. 66, prop. 14, b)).

2. Definition of the Fourier transform

Definition 3 02I1

Let μ∈M1(G)\mu\in \mathscr{M}^1(G) be a bounded complex measure on G. The Fourier transform of μ\mu is called the function FG(μ)\mathscr{F}_G(\mu) on G^\widehat{G} defined by

FG(μ)(x^)=∫G⟨x^,x⟩‾dμ(x)(5) \mathscr{F}_G(\mu)(\widehat{x}) =\int_G\overline{\langle\widehat{x}, x\rangle}d\mu(x) \tag{5}

The Fourier cotransform of μ\mu is called the function F‾G(μ)\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(\mu) on G^\widehat{G} defined by

F‾G(μ)(x^)=∫G⟨x^,x⟩dμ(x)(6) \overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(\mu)(\widehat{x}) =\int_G\langle \widehat{x}, x\rangle d\mu(x) \tag{6}

When there is no ambiguity concerning the group G considered, one shall also write F(μ)\mathscr{F}(\mu) and F‾(μ)\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\mu). One also sometimes denotes μ^=FG(μ)\widehat{\mu}=\mathscr{F}_G(\mu).

Proposition 3 02I2

For every measure μ∈M1(G)\mu\in \mathscr{M}^1(G), the functions FG(μ)\mathscr{F}_G(\mu) and F‾G(μ)\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(\mu) are continuous and bounded. The mappings FG:μ↦\mathscr{F}_G:\mu\mapsto FG(μ)\mathscr{F}_G(\mu) and F‾G:μ↦F‾G(μ)\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G:\mu\mapsto \overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(\mu) are continuous morphisms of the involutive algebra M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) into the involutive algebra of bounded continuous functions on G^\widehat{G} (Example 1 of I, p. 99).

Let μ∈M1(G)\mu\in \mathscr{M}^1(G). For every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, one has

∣F(μ)(χ)∣=∣∫G⟨χ,x⟩‾dμ(x)∣⩽∥μ∥1(7) |\mathscr{F}(\mu)(\chi )|=|\int_G\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}d\mu(x)|\leqslant \|\mu\|_1 \tag{7}

therefore the Fourier transform of μ\mu is bounded. Analogously, one verifies that F‾(μ)\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\mu) is bounded.

If χ\chi tends to χ0\chi_0 in G^\widehat{G}, the function χ\chi on G tends to χ0\chi_0 uniformly on every compact while remaining bounded by the constant function 1 which belongs to L1(G,μ)L^1(G, \mu). By the Lebesgue theorem (INT, IV, §3, no7^o7, th. 6), it follows that F(μ)(χ)\mathscr{F}(\mu)(\chi ) tends to F(μ)(χ0)\mathscr{F}(\mu)(\chi_0). Hence F(μ)\mathscr{F}(\mu) is continuous. The same is true of F‾(μ)\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\mu).

For every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, the mapping μ↦χ(μ)=∫⟨χ,x⟩dμ(x)\mu\mapsto \chi (\mu) =\int\langle \chi , x\rangle d\mu(x) is a hermitian character of M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) (Lemma 1 of II, p. 202). This implies that F\mathscr{F} and F‾\overline{\mathscr{F}} are morphisms of involutive algebras from M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) into the involutive algebra of bounded continuous functions on G^\widehat{G}. Inequality (7) proves that these morphisms are continuous.

The Fourier transform of G (resp. the Fourier cotransform of G) is the mapping μ↦FG(μ)\mu\mapsto \mathscr{F}_G(\mu) (resp. the mapping μ↦\mu\mapsto F‾G(μ)\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(\mu)) of M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) into Cb(G^)\mathscr{C}_b(\widehat{G}).

Let us note some useful formulae for μ∈M1(G),x∈G\mu\in \mathscr{M}^1(G),x\in G and χ∈G^:\chi \in \widehat{G}:

F‾(μ)(χ)=F(μ)(χ−1)=F(μ‾)(χ)‾(8) \overline{\mathscr{F}}(\mu)(\chi ) =\mathscr{F}(\mu)(\chi^{-1}) =\overline{\mathscr{F}(\overline{\mu})(\chi)} \tag{8}
∥F(μ)∥∞=∥F‾(μ)∥∞⩽∥μ∥1(9) \|\mathscr{F}(\mu)\|_{\infty}=\|\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\mu)\|_{\infty}\leqslant \|\mu\|_1 \tag{9}
F(εx)(χ)=⟨χ,x⟩‾ \mathscr{F}(\varepsilon_x)(\chi ) =\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}

(10)

F‾(εx)(χ)=⟨χ,x⟩ \overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varepsilon_x)(\chi ) =\langle \chi , x\rangle

(in particular F(εe)=F‾(εe)=1\mathscr{F}(\varepsilon_e) =\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varepsilon_e) = 1),

F(εx∗μ)(χ)=⟨χ,x⟩‾F(μ)(χ) \mathscr{F}(\varepsilon_x*\mu)(\chi ) =\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}\mathscr{F}(\mu)(\chi )

(11)

F‾(εx∗μ)(χ)=⟨χ,x⟩F‾(μ)(χ) \overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varepsilon_x*\mu)(\chi ) =\langle \chi , x\rangle \overline{\mathscr{F}}(\mu)(\chi )
F(χ⋅μ)=εχ∗F(μ) \mathscr{F}(\chi \cdot \mu) =\varepsilon_{\chi}*\mathscr{F}(\mu)

(12)

F‾(χ⋅μ)=εχ−1∗F‾(μ) \overline{\mathscr{F}}(\chi \cdot \mu) =\varepsilon_{\chi^{-1}}*\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\mu)

Formulae (8), (9), (10) and (11) follow from the definitions. Let us prove the first of formulae (12), the second being analogous. For every ξ\xi in G^\widehat{G} one has the equalities

F(χ⋅μ)(ξ)=∫G⟨ξ,x⟩⟨χ,x⟩dμ(x)=∫G⟨ξχ−1,x⟩‾dμ(x) \mathscr{F}(\chi \cdot \mu)(\xi ) =\int_G\langle \xi , x\rangle \langle \chi , x\rangle d\mu(x) =\int_G\overline{\langle\xi \chi^{-1}, x\rangle}d\mu(x)
=F(μ)(ξχ−1)=(εχ∗F(μ))(ξ) =\mathscr{F}(\mu)(\xi \chi^{-1}) = (\varepsilon_{\chi}*\mathscr{F}(\mu))(\xi )

Let us note moreover that for every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} and every measures μ\mu and ν\nu in M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G), one has

(εχ∗F(μ))(εχ∗F(ν))=εχ∗(F(μ)F(ν))(13) (\varepsilon_{\chi}*\mathscr{F}(\mu))(\varepsilon_{\chi}*\mathscr{F}(\nu )) =\varepsilon_{\chi}*(\mathscr{F}(\mu)\mathscr{F}(\nu )) \tag{13}

since the two members of this equality are functions on G^\widehat{G} whose value at ξ∈G^\xi \in \widehat{G} is

F(μ)(ξχ−1)F(ν)(ξχ−1) \mathscr{F}(\mu)(\xi \chi^{-1})\mathscr{F}(\nu )(\xi \chi^{-1})

Let H be a locally compact commutative group and let φ:G→H\varphi : G\rightarrow H be a continuous morphism. Let μ∈M1(G)\mu\in \mathscr{M}^1(G). The image measure φ(μ)\varphi (\mu) is defined (INT, V, §6, no1^o1, remark 1), and one gets FH(φ(μ))=FG(μ)∘\mathscr{F}_H(\varphi (\mu)) =\mathscr{F}_G(\mu)\circ φ^(\widehat{\varphi}(cf. INT, V, §6, no4^o4, prop. 7).

By restriction to the subalgebra L1(G)L^1(G) of M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G), one obtains the definition of the Fourier transform and of the Fourier cotransform on L1(G)L^1(G). One thus has for f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) and χ∈G^:\chi \in \widehat{G}:

(14)FG(f)(χ)=∫G⟨χ,x⟩‾f(x)dx,F‾G(f)(χ)=∫G⟨χ,x⟩f(x)dx (14)\mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi ) =\int_G\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}f(x)dx,\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)(\chi ) =\int_G\langle \chi , x\rangle f(x)dx

In particular, FG(f)=F‾G(f‾)‾\mathscr{F}_G(f) =\overline{\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(\overline{f})}. One also has

F‾(f)(χ)=χ(f)(15) \overline{\mathscr{F}}(f)(\chi ) =\chi (f) \tag{15}

for every f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) and every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}.

Let σ\sigma be an automorphism of G and Δ the module of σ\sigma (INT, VII, §1, no4^o4, def. 4). For f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G), one has

F(f∘σ)=Δ−1F(f)∘σ^−1(16) \mathscr{F}(f\circ \sigma ) = \Delta^{-1}\mathscr{F}(f)\circ \widehat{\sigma}^{-1} \tag{16}

(cf. loc. cit., formula (31)).

If one identifies G^\widehat{G} and X(L1(G))\mathsf{X}(L^1(G)) (prop. 1 of II, p. 202), the Fourier cotransform is nothing but the Gelfand transform of the Banach algebra L1(G)L^1(G) (I, p. 7, def. 5).

Proposition 4 02I3

The Fourier transform and the Fourier cotransform are injective morphisms of involutive algebras of L1(G)L^1(G) into the algebra C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}) of continuous functions vanishing at infinity on G^\widehat{G}.

The Fourier cotransform is a morphism of involutive algebras of L1(G)L^1(G) into the algebra of bounded continuous functions on G^\widehat{G} (prop. 3). Since it identifies with the Gelfand transform, its image is contained in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}) (I, p. 37, prop. 5), and its kernel is the radical of L1(G)L^1(G) (prop. 8 of I, p. 38), which is zero (cor. of prop. 22 of I, p. 126).

We shall see later (corollary to proposition 13 of II, p. 221) that the cotransform of Fourier on M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) is also injective.

Remark 02I4

The Fourier transform on the space L1(G)L^1(G) depends on the choice of the Haar measure dxdx, unlike the Fourier transform on M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G). If one replaces dxdx by the measure a⋅dxa\cdot dx (with a>0a >0), then for every integrable function ff on G, the Fourier transform of ff is af^a\widehat{f}, where f^\widehat{f} is the Fourier transform defined relative to the measure dxdx.

Consider the stellar algebra Stell(G) of the group G (def. 9 of I, p. 125), and identify L1(G)L^1(G) with a dense subalgebra of Stell(G) (prop. 22 of I, p. 126).

Proposition 5 02I5

By continuity, the Fourier transform and the cotransform of Fourier extend uniquely to isomorphisms of stellar algebras of Stell(G) onto C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}).

The cotransform of Fourier extends by continuity to a morphism of stellar algebras from Stell(G) into C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}). If one identifies G^\widehat{G} with X\mathsf{X}(Stell(G)) (cor. 1 of II, p. 204 and prop. 1 of II, p. 202), this extension is the Gelfand transform of Stell(G). By th. 1 of I, p. 108, it is an isomorphism. The assertion concerning the Fourier transform follows from this.

We shall always denote by F‾\overline{\mathscr{F}} and F\mathscr{F} the isomorphisms of prop. 5.

Corollary 02I6

The image of L1(G)L^1(G) under the Fourier transform of G is dense in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}).

Since L1(G)L^1(G) is dense in Stell(G), this follows from proposition 5.

Proposition 6 02I7

Suppose that G is compact. The normalized Haar measure dxdx belongs to M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G), and its Fourier transform is φe\varphi_e, the characteristic function of {e}\{e\}.

Let χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}. Since εy∗dx=dx\varepsilon_y*dx=dx for every y∈Gy\in G, one has

F(dx)(χ)=⟨χ,y⟩‾F(dx)(χ) \mathscr{F}(dx)(\chi ) =\overline{\langle\chi , y\rangle}\mathscr{F}(dx)(\chi )

by formula (11). If χ≠1\chi \not= 1, there exists y∈Gy\in G such that ⟨χ,y⟩≠1\langle \chi , y\rangle \not= 1, hence F(dx)(χ)=0\mathscr{F}(dx)(\chi ) = 0. If χ=1\chi = 1, then F(dx)(χ)=∫Gdx=1\mathscr{F}(dx)(\chi ) =\int_Gdx= 1 since the measure dxdx is normalized.

3. The Plancherel theorem

Denote by A(G) the subspace of L1(G)L^1(G) generated by the functions f∗gf*g for f,g∈L1(G)∩L2(G)f, g\in L^1(G)\cap L^2(G).

Proposition 7 02I8

The space A(G) is a self-adjoint ideal of L1(G)L^1(G). It is contained in L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G), and in the image of C(G)\mathscr{C}(G) in L1(G)L^1(G).

Let f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G). For every g∈L2(G)g\in L^2(G), one has f∗g∈L1(G)f*g\in L^1(G) (INT, VIII, §4, no5^o5, prop. 12). Consequently, the space L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G) is an ideal of L1(G)L^1(G), and the same is true of the space A(G). The ideal A(G) is self-adjoint.

Let ff and gg be in L2(G)L^2(G). The convolution product f∗gf*g is then the class of the continuous function given by

y↦∫Gf(yx−1)g(x)dx y\mapsto \int_Gf(yx^{-1})g(x)dx

(INT, VIII, §4, no5^o5, prop. 15). The second assertion follows.

Since χ(f∗g)=(χf)∗(χg)\chi (f*g) = (\chi f)*(\chi g) for χ∈G^,f∈L1(G)\chi \in \widehat{G},f\in L^1(G) and g∈L1(G)g\in L^1(G) (INT, VIII, §3, No.o1^o1, prop. 6), one has χh∈A(G)\chi h\in A(G) for every h∈A(G)h\in A(G) and χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}. Since εx∗f=γ(x)f\varepsilon_x*f=\boldsymbol{\gamma }(x)f and the linear representation γ\boldsymbol{\gamma } is isometric on Lp(G)L^p(G) for every pp (INT, VIII, §2, No.o5^o5, prop. 8), one has εx∗f∈A(G)\varepsilon_x*f\in A(G) for all x∈Gx\in G and f∈A(G)f\in A(G).

We denote by A^(G)\widehat{A}(G) the image of A(G) under the Fourier transform. It is a subspace of C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}).

Proposition 8 02I9

There exists a filter basis B\mathfrak{B} on A(G)∩K+(G)A(G)\cap \mathscr{K}_+(G) such that the following conditions are satisfied:

(i) For every element φ\varphi of a set of B\mathfrak{B}, one has ∥φ∥1=1\|\varphi \|_1= 1 and ∥F(φ)∥∞⩽1\|\mathscr{F}(\varphi )\|_{\infty}\leqslant 1 ;

(ii) One has

limφ,Bφ⋅dx=εe_{\varphi ,\mathfrak{B}}\varphi \cdot dx=\varepsilon_e

in the space C′(G)\mathscr{C}'(G) of measures with compact support on G endowed with the topology of uniform convergence on compact parts of C(G)\mathscr{C}(G) ;

(iii) One has

limφ,BF(φ)=1_{\varphi ,\mathfrak{B}}\mathscr{F}(\varphi ) = 1

for the topology of compact convergence on G^\widehat{G};

(iv) For p=1p= 1 or p=2p= 2, and for every f∈Lp(G)f\in L^p(G), one has φ∗f∈\varphi *f\in A(G) for every φ\varphi belonging to a set of B\mathfrak{B} and

limφ,Bφ∗f=f_{\varphi ,\mathfrak{B}}\varphi *f=f

in Lp(G)L^p(G).

Let K0K_0 be a fixed compact neighbourhood of ee in G. Let B0\mathfrak{B}_0 be a basis of the filter of neighbourhoods of ee in G consisting of symmetric compact neighbourhoods contained in K0K_0 (cf. TG, III, p. 4). For K ∈B0\in \mathfrak{B}_0, let XK′X'_K be the set of functions ψ∈K+(G)\psi \in \mathscr{K}_+(G) such that Supp(ψ)⊂K(\psi )\subset K and ∫ψ(x)dx=1\int\psi (x)dx= 1 ; it is nonempty (lemma 1 of II, p. 200). Let XKX_K be the set of functions ψ∗ψ\psi *\psi for ψ∈XK′\psi \in X'_K. It is nonempty and contained in A(G)∩K+(G)A(G)\cap \mathscr{K}_+(G). The set B\mathfrak{B} whose elements are the sets XKX_K for K varying in B0\mathfrak{B}_0 is a filter basis on A(G)∩K+(G)A(G)\cap \mathscr{K}_+(G). Let us prove that B\mathfrak{B} satisfies the required properties.

If X∈BX\in \mathfrak{B} and φ∈X\varphi \in X, one has ∥φ∥1=∫Gφ(x)dx=1\|\varphi \|_1=\int_G\varphi (x)dx= 1, whence ∥F(φ)∥∞⩽1\|\mathscr{F}(\varphi )\|_{\infty}\leqslant 1, which establishes property (i).

Property (ii) follows from INT, VIII, § 2, No.o7^o7, Corollary 1 to Lemma 4. A compact subset of G^\widehat{G} is a compact subset of C(G)\mathscr{C}(G), hence (ii) implies limφ,BF(φ)=1_{\varphi ,\mathfrak{B}}\mathscr{F}(\varphi ) = 1 for the topology of compact convergence on G^\widehat{G}, that is, (iii).

Finally, let p=1p= 1 or p=2p= 2. Let f∈Lp(G)f\in L^p(G). We have φ∗f→f\varphi *f\rightarrow f in Lp(G)L^p(G) with respect to the filter B\mathfrak{B} (INT, VIII, §4, no7^o7, prop. 20). Moreover, for every K in B0\mathfrak{B}_0 and φ∈XK\varphi \in X_K, there exists ψ∈XK′\psi \in X'_K such that φ=ψ∗ψ\varphi =\psi *\psi, whence φ∗f=ψ∗(ψ∗f)\varphi *f=\psi *(\psi *f). We have ψ∈L1(G)∩L2(G)\psi \in L^1(G)\cap L^2(G) and ψ∗f∈L1(G)∩L2(G)\psi *f\in L^1(G)\cap L^2(G), hence φ∗f∈A(G)\varphi *f\in A(G).

Corollary 1 02IA

The space A(G) is dense in L1(G)L^1(G) and in L2(G)L^2(G). It is also dense in Stell(G), and its image A^(G)\widehat{A}(G) under the Fourier transform is dense in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}).

Assertion (iv) of the proposition provides the first assertion. Since L1(G)L^1(G) is dense in Stell(G), the second follows from it, and the last then follows from Prop. 5 of II, p. 209.

Corollary 2 02IB

For f∈A(G)f\in A(G), let Ωf\Omega_f be the set of χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} such that F(f)(χ)≠0\mathscr{F}(f)(\chi )\not= 0. The sets Ωf\Omega_f form an open covering of G^\widehat{G}.

This follows from the preceding corollary since, for every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, the mapping f↦F(f)(χ)f\mapsto \mathscr{F}(f)(\chi ) is a nonzero character of L1(G)L^1(G).

Recall that the left regular representation γ\boldsymbol{\gamma } of Stell(G) on L2(G)L^2(G) (cf. I, p. 125, no13^o13) is denoted by γ(φ)f\boldsymbol{\gamma }(\varphi )f = φ∗f\varphi *f for φ∈\varphi \in Stell(G) and f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G).

Lemma 3 02IC

For every f∈A(G)f\in A(G), there exists a unique bounded measure μf\mu_f on G^\widehat{G} such that

(φ∗f)(e)=∫G^F(φ)dμf(17) (\varphi *f)(e) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}(\varphi )d\mu_f \tag{17}

for every φ∈\varphi \in Stell(G).

Moreover, for every ff and gg in A(G), we have the equality

F(f)⋅μg=F(g)⋅μf(18) \mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \mu_g=\mathscr{F}(g)\cdot \mu_f \tag{18}

between the measure with density F(f)\mathscr{F}(f) with respect to μg\mu_g and the measure with density F(g)\mathscr{F}(g) with respect to μf\mu_f.

Let f,gf,g be elements of L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G). For every φ∈\varphi \in Stell(G), one has φ∗f∈L2(G)\varphi *f\in L^2(G) and ∥φ∗f∥2⩽∥φ∥∗∥f∥2(\|\varphi *f\|_2\leqslant \|\varphi \|_*\|f\|_2(I, p. 126, formula (8)). Moreover, one has φ∗(f∗g)=(φ∗f)∗g(\varphi *(f*g) = (\varphi *f)*g(loc. cit., formula (9)). This latter function belongs to the closure C0(G)\mathscr{C}_0(G) of K(G)\mathscr{K}(G) in C(G)\mathscr{C}(G) (INT, VIII, §4, no5^o5, prop. 15). Moreover, one has

∥φ∗(f∗g)∥∞⩽∥φ∗f∥2∥g∥2⩽∥φ∥∗∥f∥2∥g∥2 \|\varphi *(f*g)\|_{\infty}\leqslant \|\varphi *f\|_2\|g\|_2\leqslant \|\varphi \|_*\|f\|_2\|g\|_2

Since the functions f∗gf*g for ff and gg in L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G) generate A(G), it follows that φ∗f∈C0(G)\varphi *f\in \mathscr{C}_0(G) for all f∈A(G)f\in A(G) and φ∈\varphi \in Stell(G), and that the mapping φ↦(φ∗f)(e)\varphi \mapsto (\varphi *f)(e) is a continuous linear form on Stell(G). Since F\mathscr{F} is an isomorphism of Stell(G) onto C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}) (prop. 5 of II, p. 209), the first assertion follows.

Now let ff and gg be in A(G). For φ∈L1(G)\varphi \in L^1(G), one has

(F(f)⋅μg)(F(φ))=∫G^F(φ)F(f)dμg=∫G^F(φ∗f)dμg (\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \mu_g)(\mathscr{F}(\varphi )) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}(\varphi )\mathscr{F}(f)d\mu_g=\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}(\varphi *f)d\mu_g
=((φ∗f)∗g)(e)(19) = ((\varphi *f)*g)(e) \tag{19}

Since (φ∗f)∗g=(φ∗g)∗f(\varphi *f)*g= (\varphi *g)*f and since the image of L1(G)L^1(G) under the Fourier transform is dense in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}) (cor. of II, p. 210), one deduces from formula (19) that formula (18) is satisfied for all ff and gg in A(G).

Lemma 4 02ID

There exists a unique measure ν\nu on G^\widehat{G} such that

μf=F(f)⋅ν \mu_f=\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \nu

for every f∈A(G)f\in A(G). For f∈A(G)f\in A(G), one has F(f)∈L1(G^,ν)∩L2(G^,ν)\mathscr{F}(f)\in L^1(\widehat{G}, \nu )\cap L^2(\widehat{G}, \nu ).

Let f∈A(G)f\in A(G). Let Ωf\Omega_f denote the open set in G^\widehat{G} formed by the χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} such that F(f)(χ)≠0\mathscr{F}(f)(\chi )\not= 0. Let φ\varphi be the characteristic function of G^−Ωf\widehat{G}-\Omega_f. Then for every g∈A(G)g\in A(G), one has

∫G^F(g)d(φ⋅μf)=∫G^φF(f)dμg=0 \int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}(g)d(\varphi \cdot \mu_f) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\varphi \mathscr{F}(f)d\mu_g= 0

in view of formula (18).

By corollary 1 of II, p. 212, the image A^(G)\widehat{A}(G) of A(G) under the Fourier transform is dense in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}). One then deduces from the preceding formula that φ⋅μf=0\varphi \cdot \mu_f= 0, hence that μf\mu_f is concentrated on Ωf\Omega_f (INT, IV, §4, no7^o7, def. 4). Let νf\nu_f be the measure on Ωf\Omega_f with density F(f)−1\mathscr{F}(f)^{-1} with respect to μf∣Ωf\mu_f|\Omega_f.

The sets Ωf\Omega_f, for f∈A(G)f\in A(G), form an open covering of G^\widehat{G} (cor. 2). For all ff and gg in A(G), formula (18) shows that νf∣(Ωf∩Ωg)=νg∣(Ωf∩Ωg)\nu_f|(\Omega_f\cap \Omega_g) =\nu_g|(\Omega_f\cap \Omega_g). Consequently, there exists a unique measure ν\nu on G^\widehat{G} such that one has νf=ν∣Ωf\nu_f=\nu |\Omega_f for every f∈A(G)f\in A(G) (INT, III, §2, No.o1^o1, prop. 1).

If f∈A(G)f\in A(G), the measures μf\mu_f and F(f)⋅ν\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \nu are concentrated on Ωf\Omega_f, and their restrictions to Ωf\Omega_f are equal to F(f)⋅νf\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \nu_f; these measures are therefore equal.

Since μf\mu_f is a bounded measure, the Fourier transform F(f)\mathscr{F}(f) belongs to the space L1(G^,ν)L^1(\widehat{G}, \nu ). Since moreover F(f)\mathscr{F}(f) belongs to C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}), one has also F(f)∈L2(G^,ν)\mathscr{F}(f)\in L^2(\widehat{G}, \nu ).

Formula (17) now takes the form, for φ∈\varphi \in Stell(G) and f∈A(G)f\in A(G): (20) (φ∗f)(e)=∫G^F(φ)F(f)dν(\varphi *f)(e) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}(\varphi )\mathscr{F}(f)d\nu.

In particular, for ff and gg in A(G), one has

∫G^F(f)F(g)dν=(f∗g)(e)=∫Gf(x)g(x−1)dx(21) \int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}(f)\mathscr{F}(g)d\nu = (f*g)(e) =\int_Gf(x)g(x^{-1})dx \tag{21}

Proposition 9 02IE

The measure ν\nu characterized by lemma 4 is a Haar measure on G^\widehat{G}.

Let χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}. For ff and gg in A(G), let us apply formula (21) to χf\chi f and χg\chi g. The right-hand side is unchanged, whence

ν(F(f)F(g))=ν(F(χf)F(χg)) \nu (\mathscr{F}(f)\mathscr{F}(g)) =\nu (\mathscr{F}(\chi f)\mathscr{F}(\chi g))

From formulas (12) of II, p. 208 and (13) of II, p. 208, one gets

ν(F(f)F(g))=ν(εχ∗(F(f)F(g))) \nu (\mathscr{F}(f)\mathscr{F}(g)) =\nu (\varepsilon_{\chi}*(\mathscr{F}(f)\mathscr{F}(g)))

One then deduces from INT, VIII, §4, No.o3^o3, prop. 7 that

ν(F(f)F(g))=(εχ−1∗ν)(F(f)F(g)) \nu (\mathscr{F}(f)\mathscr{F}(g)) = (\varepsilon_{\chi^{-1}}*\nu )(\mathscr{F}(f)\mathscr{F}(g))

that is to say

(F(f)⋅ν)(F(g))=(F(f)⋅(εχ−1∗ν))(F(g)) (\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \nu )(\mathscr{F}(g)) = (\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot (\varepsilon_{\chi^{-1}}*\nu ))(\mathscr{F}(g))

Since the space A^(G)\widehat{A}(G) is dense in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}) (cor. 1), it follows that one has the equality

F(f)⋅ν=F(f)⋅(εχ−1∗ν) \mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \nu =\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot (\varepsilon_{\chi^{-1}}*\nu )

The measures ν\nu and εχ−1∗ν\varepsilon_{\chi^{-1}}*\nu therefore coincide on the open set Ωf\Omega_f where F(f)\mathscr{F}(f) is not zero. By corollary 2 and INT, III, §2, No.o1^o1, cor. of prop. 1, these measures are therefore equal.

This shows that the measure ν\nu is proportional to a Haar measure on G^\widehat{G}. Let f∈A(G)f\in A(G). Take g=f~g=\widetilde{f} in formula (21). It then takes the form

∫G^∣F(f)∣2dν=∫G∣f∣2dx(22) \int_{\widehat{G}}|\mathscr{F}(f)|^2d\nu =\int_G|f|^2dx \tag{22}

which shows that the measure ν\nu is not zero. The measure ν\nu is therefore a Haar measure on G^\widehat{G}.

Definition 4 02IF

The Haar measure ν\nu on G^\widehat{G} of proposition 9 is called the dual measure of the given Haar measure dxdx on G.

We shall often denote by dχd\chi or dx^d\widehat{x} the Haar measure on G^\widehat{G} which is dual to the Haar measure dxdx.

Remark 02IG

Let aa be a real number >0>0. If one replaces dxdx by the measure a⋅dxa\cdot dx, the convolution product of the functions ff and g∈L1(G)g\in L^1(G) is replaced by a(f∗g)a(f*g). We have seen (II, p. 209, remark) that F(f)\mathscr{F}(f) is replaced by aF(f)a\mathscr{F}(f). Hence μf\mu_f is unchanged and ν\nu is replaced by a−1⋅νa^{-1}\cdot \nu. In particular, the measure dx⊗dx^dx\otimes d\widehat{x} on G×G^G\times \widehat{G} is independent of the choice of the Haar measure on G.

Lemma 5 02IH

The space A(G^)A(\widehat{G}) is dense in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}).

Let hh be an element of L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) orthogonal to A^(G)\widehat{A}(G). For ff and gg in A(G), one has F(f)⋅F(g)=F(f∗g)∈A^(G)\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \mathscr{F}(g) =\mathscr{F}(f*g)\in \widehat{A}(G), hence h⋅F(f)‾h\cdot \overline{\mathscr{F}(f)} is orthogonal to F(g)\mathscr{F}(g). Thus, for every f∈A(G)f\in A(G), the function h⋅F(f)h\cdot \mathscr{F}(f) is orthogonal to A^(G)\widehat{A}(G). But h⋅F(f)∈L1(G^)h\cdot \mathscr{F}(f)\in L^1(\widehat{G}), and A^(G)\widehat{A}(G) is dense in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}), therefore the measure hF(f)⋅νh\mathscr{F}(f)\cdot \nu is zero, that is to say that hF(f)h\mathscr{F}(f) is ν\nu-locally negligible (INT, V, §5, no3^o3, cor. 2 of prop. 3). In particular, hh is ν\nu-locally negligible on the set Ωf\Omega_f of characters χ\chi such that F(f)(χ)≠0\mathscr{F}(f)(\chi )\not= 0. By Corollary 2, it follows that hh is ν\nu-locally negligible, hence zero since hh belongs to L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}). This concludes the proof.

Theorem 1 (Plancherel) 02II

The restriction of the Fourier transform to the subspace A(G) of L2(G)L^2(G) extends in a unique way to an isometry Φ of L2(G)L^2(G) onto L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}).

Moreover, if f∈L1(G)∩L2(G)f\in L^1(G)\cap L^2(G), its Fourier transform belongs to L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) and coincides in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) with Φ(f)\Phi (f).

By formula (22), the restriction of F\mathscr{F} to A(G) is an isometry of the subspace A(G) of L2(G)L^2(G) onto the subspace A^(G)\widehat{A}(G) of L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}). Since A(G) is dense in L2(G)L^2(G) (cor. 1 of II, p. 212), the Fourier transform extends uniquely to an isometry Φ of L2(G)L^2(G) onto a closed subspace of L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}). But since its image contains A^(G)\widehat{A}(G), which is dense in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) (lemma 5), the mapping Φ is surjective.

Let now f∈L1(G)∩L2(G)f\in L^1(G)\cap L^2(G); let us show that its Fourier transform belongs to L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}). By prop. 8, (iv) of II, p. 211, and the fact that A(G) is an ideal of L1(G)L^1(G), there exists a filter basis B\mathfrak{B} on A(G) which converges to ff both in L1(G)L^1(G) and in L2(G)L^2(G). We then have

Φ(f)=\Phi (f) = limg,BΦ(g)=_{g,\mathfrak{B}}\Phi (g) = limg,BF(g)_{g,\mathfrak{B}}\mathscr{F}(g) in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) and F(f)=\mathscr{F}(f) = limg,BF(g)_{g,\mathfrak{B}}\mathscr{F}(g) in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}). There therefore exists a

sequence (gn)(g_n) in A(G) such that F(gn)\mathscr{F}(g_n) converges to Φ(f)\Phi (f) in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) and to F(f)\mathscr{F}(f) in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}). By INT, IV, §3, No.o4^o4, th. 3 and cor. 1, we have F(f)=Φ(f)\mathscr{F}(f) = \Phi (f), and in particular F(f)∈L2(G^)\mathscr{F}(f)\in L^2(\widehat{G}). This completes the proving of the theorem.

We still denote by F\mathscr{F} the isometry of L2(G)L^2(G) onto L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) defined in theorem 1, and we call it the Fourier transform in L2(G)L^2(G). Analogously, the inverse Fourier transform admits a unique isometric extension to L2(G)L^2(G), still called the inverse Fourier transform and denoted by F‾\overline{\mathscr{F}}.

Corollary 02IJ

Suppose that G is compact and that dxdx is the normalized Haar measure on G. Then the family of unitary characters of G is an orthonormal basis of L2(G)L^2(G).

Since G is compact, the characters of G belong to L2(G)L^2(G). For χ\chi and ξ\xi in G^\widehat{G}, we have

∫G⟨χ,x⟩⟨ξ,x⟩dx=FG(dx)(χξ−1) \int_G\langle \chi , x\rangle \langle \xi , x\rangle dx=\mathscr{F}_G(dx)(\chi \xi^{-1})

therefore the family of characters of G is orthonormal (prop. 6 of II, p. 210). It is moreover total because the scalar product of χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} and of f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G) is equal to FG(f)(χ)\mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi ), and therefore ff is orthogonal to G^\widehat{G} if and only if FG(f)\mathscr{F}_G(f) is zero in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}), if and only if ff is zero (th. 1).

Remark 1 02IK

Certain formulas concerning the Fourier transform on L1(G)L^1(G) extend to the Fourier transform on L2(G)L^2(G). In particular, for f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G) and χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, we have

F‾(f)=(χ↦F(f)(χ−1))=F(f‾)‾ \overline{\mathscr{F}}(f) = (\chi \mapsto \mathscr{F}(f)(\chi^{-1})) =\overline{\mathscr{F}(\overline{f})}
F(εx∗f)=η(x−1)F(f),F‾(εx∗f)=η(x)F(f) \mathscr{F}(\varepsilon_x*f) =\eta (x^{-1})\mathscr{F}(f),\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varepsilon_x*f) =\eta (x)\mathscr{F}(f)
F(χf)=εχ∗F(f),F‾(χf)=εχ∗F(f) \mathscr{F}(\chi f) =\varepsilon_{\chi}*\mathscr{F}(f),\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\chi f) =\varepsilon_{\chi}*\mathscr{F}(f)

If σ\sigma is an automorphism of G and Δ the module of σ\sigma (INT, VII, §1, No.o4^o4, def. 4), then for f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G), one has

F(f∘σ)=Δ−1F(f)∘σ^−1 \mathscr{F}(f\circ \sigma ) = \Delta^{-1}\mathscr{F}(f)\circ \widehat{\sigma}^{-1}

in L2(G)L^2(G).

Remark 2 02IL

The formulas

∥F‾(f)∥2=∥f∥2(23) \|\overline{\mathscr{F}}(f)\|^2=\|f\|^2 \tag{23}

for f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G), or else

∫Gf(x)g(x)‾dx=∫G^F(f)(χ)F(g)(χ)‾dχ(24) \int_Gf(x)\overline{g(x)}dx=\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}(f)(\chi )\overline{\mathscr{F}(g)(\chi)}d\chi \tag{24}

for ff and gg in L2(G)L^2(G), are called "Plancherel formulas".

Proposition 10 02IM

Let n⩾0n\geqslant 0 be an integer and let G1,⋯ ,GnG_1,\cdots ,G_n be locally compact commutative groups. Let μj\mu_j, for 1⩽j⩽n1\leqslant j\leqslant n, be Haar measures on GjG_j. Let G be the product group of the groups GjG_j for 1⩽j⩽n1\leqslant j\leqslant n. Let β\beta be the isomorphism of G^\widehat{G} onto ∏G^j\prod\widehat{G}_j of Prop. 2 of II, p. 206. The Haar measure on G^\widehat{G} dual to the product Haar measure μ=μ1⊗⋯⊗μn\mu=\mu_1\otimes \cdots \otimes \mu_n on G identifies with the product of the Haar measures μ^j\widehat{\mu}_j.

In fact, for every family (fj)(f_j) of non-zero elements of L2(Gj)\mathscr{L}^2(G_j), the function ff on G defined by (xj)↦∏fj(xj)(x_j)\mapsto \prod f_j(x_j) belong to L2(G)\mathscr{L}^2(G), and satisfies

∫G∣f∣2dμ=∏j∫Gj∣fj∣2dμj=∏j∫G^j∣FGj(f)∣2dμ^j \int_G|f|^2d\mu=\prod_j\int_{G_j}|f_j|^2d\mu_j=\prod_j\int_{\widehat{G}_j}|\mathscr{F}_{G_j}(f)|^2d\widehat{\mu}_j

by the Plancherel formula, which proves that the product Haar measure of the μ^j\widehat{\mu}_j identifies with the Haar measure dual to μ\mu.

4. The fourier inversion formula

Recall that every element ff of A(G) is the class of a unique continuous function (Prop. 7, b) of II, p. 210). For x∈Gx\in G, we denote by f(x)f(x) the value of this function at xx.

Proposition 11 02IN

Let f∈A(G)f\in A(G). Then F(f)∈L1(G^)\mathscr{F}(f)\in L^1(\widehat{G}) and, for every x∈Gx\in G, one has

f(x)=∫G^⟨x^,x⟩F(f)(x^)dx^(25) f(x) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\langle \widehat{x}, x\rangle \mathscr{F}(f)(\widehat{x})d\widehat{x} \tag{25}

In other words, for f∈A(G)f\in A(G), one has

f=F‾G^(FG(f))∘η(26) f=\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\mathscr{F}_G(f))\circ \eta \tag{26}

where η\eta denotes the canonical mapping of G into the bidual group G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}}.

By Lemma 4 of II, p. 213 and Proposition 9 of II, p. 214, one has F(f)∈L1(G^)\mathscr{F}(f)\in L^1(\widehat{G}) for every function f∈A(G)f\in A(G). By the Plancherel formula (24), for ff and gg in L2(G)L^2(G), one has

(f∗g~)(e)=∫G^F(f)(χ)F(g)(χ)‾dx^(χ)(27) (f*\widetilde{g})(e) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}(f)(\chi )\overline{\mathscr{F}(g)(\chi)}d\widehat{x}(\chi ) \tag{27}

Let ff and gg be in L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G) and let h=f∗g~∈A(G)h=f*\widetilde{g}\in A(G). Since the Fourier transform is an involutive morphism, formula (27) is assertion (25) for the function hh at the point x=ex=e. By linearity, one deduces that formula (25) is valid at the point x=ex=e for every function h∈A(G)h\in A(G).

Let x∈Gx\in G and h∈A(G)h\in A(G). Let h1=εx−1∗hh_1=\varepsilon_{x^{-1}}*h. Then h1∈A(G)h_1\in A(G) and h1(e)=h(x)h_1(e) =h(x). Since moreover F(h1)(χ)=⟨χ,x⟩‾F(f)(χ)\mathscr{F}(h_1)(\chi ) =\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}\mathscr{F}(f)(\chi ) for every χ∈G^(\chi \in \widehat{G}(cf. formula (11) of II, p. 208), formula (25) for the function h1h_1 at the point ee implies formula (25) for hh at the point xx.

Lemma 6 02IO

Let φ∈L1(G^)∩L2(G^)\varphi \in L^1(\widehat{G})\cap L^2(\widehat{G}). Then f=F‾G^(φ)∘ηf=\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\varphi )\circ \eta belongs to L2(G)L^2(G) and FG(f)=φ\mathscr{F}_G(f) =\varphi in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}).

The function ff is continuous and bounded on G since φ∈L1(G^)\varphi \in L^1(\widehat{G}). For every function g∈L1(G)∩L2(G)g\in L^1(G)\cap L^2(G), one has

∫Gg(x)f(x)dx=∫Gg(x)(∫G^⟨χ,x⟩φ(χ)dx^(χ))dx \int_Gg(x)f(x)dx=\int_Gg(x)(\int_{\widehat{G}}\langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (\chi )d\widehat{x}(\chi ))dx
=∫G^F‾G(g)(χ)φ(χ)dx^(χ)(28) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(g)(\chi )\varphi (\chi )d\widehat{x}(\chi ) \tag{28}

applying the Lebesgue-Fubini theorem (INT, V, §8, no4^o4, th. 1, a)) to the function (x,χ)↦g(x)φ(χ)⟨χ,x⟩(x, \chi )\mapsto g(x)\varphi (\chi )\langle \chi , x\rangle which is integrable on G×G^G\times \widehat{G} with respect to the product measure dx⊗dx^dx\otimes d\widehat{x}. It follows that

∣∫Gg(x)f(x)dx∣⩽∥F‾G(g)∥2∥φ∥2=∥g∥2∥φ∥2 |\int_Gg(x)f(x)dx|\leqslant \|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(g)\|_2\|\varphi \|_2=\|g\|_2\|\varphi \|_2

by Plancherel's formula. The linear form g↦∫Gfgg\mapsto \int_Gf g is therefore continuous on L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G), and since L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G) is dense in the Hilbert space L2(G)L^2(G), it follows that ff belongs to L2(G)L^2(G).

Applying then Theorem 1 of II, p. 215, one obtains on the other hand

∫Gg(x)f(x)dx=∫G^FG(g‾)(χ)‾FG(f)(χ)dx^(χ) \int_Gg(x)f(x)dx=\int_{\widehat{G}}\overline{\mathscr{F}_G(\overline{g})(\chi)}\mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi )d\widehat{x}(\chi )
=∫G^F‾G(g)(χ)FG(f)(χ)dx^(χ) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(g)(\chi )\mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi )d\widehat{x}(\chi )

for every g∈L2(G)g\in L^2(G). Comparing with (28), one concludes that φ=FG(f)\varphi =\mathscr{F}_G(f) in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}), since A(G) is contained in L1(G)∩L2(G)L^1(G)\cap L^2(G) and A^(G)\widehat{A}(G) is dense in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) (Lemma 5 of II, p. 215).

Proposition 12 (Fourier inversion formula)

Let f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G) be such that FG(f)∈L1(G^)\mathscr{F}_G(f)\in L^1(\widehat{G}). Then one has ff = F‾G(FG(f))∘η\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(\mathscr{F}_G(f))\circ \eta in L2(G)L^2(G). In other words, for almost every x∈Gx\in G, one has

f(x)=∫G^⟨x^,x⟩FG(f)(x^)dx^ f(x) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\langle \widehat{x}, x\rangle \mathscr{F}_G(f)(\widehat{x})d\widehat{x}

The function φ=FG(f)\varphi =\mathscr{F}_G(f) belongs to L1(G^)∩L2(G^)L^1(\widehat{G})\cap L^2(\widehat{G}), and the desired formula is obtained by applying the lemma.

Corollary 1 02IP

For every closed subset P of G^\widehat{G} and every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} not belonging to P, there exists a function f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) such that F(f)\mathscr{F}(f) is zero on P and non-zero at χ\chi.

Since, by (12), one has F(χf)=εχ∗F(f)\mathscr{F}(\chi f) =\varepsilon_{\chi}*\mathscr{F}(f) for every χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, it is enough to consider the case where χ\chi is the identity element of G^\widehat{G}.

Let U be a compact symmetric neighbourhood of e∈G^e\in \widehat{G} such that U2∩P=∅U^2\cap P =\emptyset. Let φ\varphi be a positive continuous function on G^\widehat{G}, zero outside U and such that φ(e)=1\varphi (e) = 1. The function φ1=φ∗φ\varphi_1=\varphi *\varphi is then zero on P and φ1(e)>0\varphi_1(e)>0. It is enough therefore to prove that φ1\varphi_1 belongs to the image of the Fourier transform on L1(G)L^1(G). Now φ\varphi and φ1\varphi_1 belong to L1(G^)∩L2(G^)L^1(\widehat{G})\cap L^2(\widehat{G}). Put f=F‾(φ)∘ηf=\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varphi )\circ \eta and f1=F‾(φ1)∘ηf_1=\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varphi_1)\circ \eta. Lemma 6 implies that ff and f1f_1 belong to L2(G)L^2(G) and satisfy φ=F(f)\varphi =\mathscr{F}(f) and φ1=F(f1)\varphi_1=\mathscr{F}(f_1). Moreover

f1=F‾(φ∗φ)∘η=(F‾(φ)∘η)2=f2 f_1=\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varphi *\varphi )\circ \eta = (\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varphi )\circ \eta )^2=f^2

and therefore f1∈L1(G)f_1\in L^1(G). Thus φ1=F(f1)\varphi_1=\mathscr{F}(f_1) does indeed belong to the image of L1(G)L^1(G) by the Fourier transform.

Corollary 2 02IQ

The Banach algebra L1(G)L^1(G) is regular (I, p. 89, def. 1).

By Prop. 1 of I, p. 88 and the identification of the Gelfand transform of L1(G)L^1(G) with the Fourier cotransform of G, this follows from the preceding corollary.

5. The Pontryagin Duality Theorem

Theorem 2 (Pontryagin) 02IR

The canonical mapping η\eta of G into G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}} is an isomorphism of topological groups. It transforms the Haar measure dxdx into the bidual Haar measure dx^^d\widehat{\widehat{x}}.

Let us first prove that η\eta is injective and strict. For this it is enough to show that for every neighbourhood U of ee in G, there exists a neighbourhood W of ee in G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}} such that η−1(W)⊂U\overset{-1}{\eta}(W)\subset U (Lemma 2 of II, p. 200). Now let V be a compact symmetric neighbourhood of ee in G such that V2⊂UV^2\subset U, let ff be a positive continuous function on G, with support contained in V, and such that f(e)>0f(e)>0. Let g=f~∗fg=\widetilde{f}*f. Then gg belongs to A(G), its support is contained in U and g(e)>0g(e)>0. Moreover, FG(g)∈L1(G^)\mathscr{F}_G(g)\in L^1(\widehat{G}) by Prop. 11 of II, p. 217. The set W of the ξ\xi in G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}} such that

∣F‾G^(FG(g))(ξ)−F‾G^(FG(g))(e)∣<12g(e) |\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\mathscr{F}_G(g))(\xi )-\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\mathscr{F}_G(g))(e)|<\frac{1}{2}g(e)

is a neighbourhood of ee in G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}} since the function F‾G^(FG(g))\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\mathscr{F}_G(g)) is continuous on G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}}. Let x∈η−1(W)x\in \overset{-1}{\eta}(W). By formula (26), we have

F‾G^(FG(g))(η(x))=g(x) \overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\mathscr{F}_G(g))(\eta (x)) =g(x)

and therefore ∣g(x)−g(e)∣<12g(e)|g(x)-g(e)|<\frac{1}{2}g(e). This implies that g(x)≠0g(x)\not= 0 and therefore x∈Ux\in U, since the support of gg is contained in U. Thus η−1(W)⊂U\overset{-1}{\eta}(W)\subset U.

Let us prove that the mapping η\eta is surjective. Since this mapping is a homeomorphism onto its image, the group η(G)\eta (G) is a locally compact subgroup of G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}}. It is therefore closed in G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}} (TG, III, p. 22, Cor. 2). Arguing by contradiction, suppose that there exists a character ξ∈G^^\xi \in \widehat{\widehat{G}} such that ξ∉η(G)\xi \notin \eta (G). Then there exists (Corollary 1 of II, p. 219) a nonzero element ff of L1(G^)L^1(\widehat{G}) such that FG^(f)\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(f) is zero on η(G)\eta (G). Let g∈L1(G)g\in L^1(G). The function (x,χ)↦g(x)f(χ)⟨χ,x⟩(x, \chi )\mapsto g(x)f(\chi )\langle \chi , x\rangle belong to L1(G×G^)L^1(G\times \widehat{G}). By Lebesgue-Fubini's theorem (INT, V, §8, no4^o4, th. 1, a)), there follows therefore

∫G^f(χ)FG(g)(χ)dχ=∫Gg(x)(∫G^f(χ)⟨χ,x⟩‾dχ)dx \int_{\widehat{G}}f(\chi )\mathscr{F}_G(g)(\chi )d\chi =\int_Gg(x)(\int_{\widehat{G}}f(\chi )\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}d\chi )dx
=∫Gg(x)FG^(f)(η(x))dx=0 =\int_Gg(x)\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(f)(\eta (x))dx= 0

Since the image of the Fourier transform is dense in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}) (corollary of Prop. 5 of II, p. 209), it follows that the measure f⋅dχf\cdot d\chi is zero. This contradicts the fact that f≠0f\not= 0 in L1(G^)L^1(\widehat{G}), and proves that η\eta is surjective.

The image measure η(dx)\eta (dx) and the measure ν\nu dual to the measure dχd\chi are Haar measures on G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}}. Let ff be a nonzero element of A(G) ; in particular f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G). By Prop. 12 of II, p. 219,FG(f)∈L1(G^),\mathscr{F}_G(f)\in L^1(\widehat{G}) and one has

∫G^^∣F‾G^(FG(f))∣2η(dx)=∫G∣f∣2dx=∫G^^∣F‾G^(FG(f))∣2dν \int_{\widehat{\widehat{G}}}|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\mathscr{F}_G(f))|^2\eta (dx) =\int_G|f|^2dx=\int_{\widehat{\widehat{G}}}|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\mathscr{F}_G(f))|^2d\nu

where the second equality follows from two applications of the Plancherel formula, hence the Haar measure dual to dχd\chi is the measure η(dx)\eta (dx).

Henceforth we shall identify G and G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}} by means of the isomorphism η\eta. One then has:

Corollary 02IS

The Fourier cotransform of L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) onto L2(G)L^2(G) and the Fourier transform of L2(G)L^2(G) onto L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}) are reciprocal isometries of one another.

Remark 02IT

Let f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G) and g∈L2(G^)g\in L^2(\widehat{G}). Applying the Plancherel formula (24) to ff and FG^(g)‾\overline{\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(g)}, one obtains the formula

∫Gf(x)FG^(g)(x)dx=∫G^FG(f)(χ)g(χ)dx^(χ)(29) \int_Gf(x)\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(g)(x)dx=\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi )g(\chi )d\widehat{x}(\chi ) \tag{29}

since one has FG(FG^(g))=FG(F‾G^(g‾))=g‾\mathscr{F}_G(\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(g)) =\mathscr{F}_G(\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\overline{g})) =\overline{g}.

The Fourier transform and cotransform defined on M1(G^)\mathscr{M}^1(\widehat{G}) take their values in the space of bounded continuous functions on G. For β∈M1(G^)\beta \in \mathscr{M}^1(\widehat{G}) and x∈Gx\in G, one has

FG^(β)(x)=∫G^⟨χ,x⟩‾dβ(χ),F‾G^(β)(x)=∫G^⟨χ,x⟩dβ(χ) \mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(\beta )(x) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}d\beta (\chi ),\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\beta )(x) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\langle \chi , x\rangle d\beta (\chi )

The Fourier transforms of G and G^\widehat{G} are also transposes of one another. More precisely:

Proposition 13 02IU

Let α∈M1(G)\alpha \in \mathscr{M}^1(G) and β∈M1(G^)\beta \in \mathscr{M}^1(\widehat{G}). Then one has (30) FG(F‾G^(β)⋅α)=β∗FG(α)\mathscr{F}_G(\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\beta )\cdot \alpha ) =\beta *\mathscr{F}_G(\alpha )

and in particular

∫GFG^(β)(x)dα(x)=∫G^FG(α)(χ)dβ(χ)(31) \int_G\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(\beta )(x)d\alpha (x) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}_G(\alpha )(\chi )d\beta (\chi ) \tag{31}

Formula (30) implies formula (31) by evaluating both sides of the identity at χ=1\chi = 1. Let us prove (30). Let χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}. There follows

(FG(F‾G^(β)⋅α))(χ)=∫G⟨χ,x⟩‾F‾G^(β)(x)dα(x) (\mathscr{F}_G(\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\beta )\cdot \alpha ))(\chi ) =\int_G\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\beta )(x)d\alpha (x)
=∫G⟨χ,x⟩‾(∫G^⟨ξ,x⟩dβ(ξ))dα(x) =\int_G\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}(\int_{\widehat{G}}\langle \xi , x\rangle d\beta (\xi ))d\alpha (x)

The function (x,ξ)↦⟨χ,x⟩⟨ξ,x⟩(x, \xi )\mapsto \langle \chi , x\rangle \langle \xi , x\rangle is continuous and bounded, hence integrable on G×G^G\times \widehat{G} with respect to the measure α⊗β\alpha \otimes \beta. By Lebesgue-Fubini's theorem (INT, V, §8, no4^o4, th. 1, a)), one obtains

(FG(F‾G^(β)⋅α))(χ)=∫G^(∫G⟨χξ−1,x⟩‾dα(x))dβ(ξ) (\mathscr{F}_G(\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\beta )\cdot \alpha ))(\chi ) =\int_{\widehat{G}}(\int_G\overline{\langle\chi \xi^{-1}, x\rangle}d\alpha (x))d\beta (\xi )
=∫G^FG(α)(χξ−1)dβ(ξ)=(β∗FG(α))(χ) =\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}_G(\alpha )(\chi \xi^{-1})d\beta (\xi ) = (\beta *\mathscr{F}_G(\alpha ))(\chi )

as desired.

Corollary 02IV

The Fourier transform FG\mathscr{F}_G is injective on M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G).

In fact, if α∈M1(G)\alpha \in \mathscr{M}^1(G) satisfies FG(α)=0\mathscr{F}_G(\alpha ) = 0, one deduces from (31) that α(FG(f))=0\alpha (\mathscr{F}_G(f)) = 0 for every f∈L1(G^)f\in L^1(\widehat{G}); since the image of L1(G^)L^1(\widehat{G}) under the Fourier trans^\widehat{s}form is dense in C0(G)\mathscr{C}_0(G) (corollary to Proposition 5 of II, p. 209), it follows that α=0\alpha = 0.

There exist function spaces on G and G^\widehat{G}, other than L2(G)L^2(G) and L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}), on which F\mathscr{F} and F‾\overline{\mathscr{F}} are inverse isomorphisms of one another. The following theorem gives an example of this. We denote by B(G) the vector subspace of L1(G)L^1(G) consisting of the elements f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) such that FG(f)∈L1(G^)\mathscr{F}_G(f)\in L^1(\widehat{G}). This is a subalgebra of L1(G)L^1(G). In fact, let ff and gg be in B(G). Then f∗g∈L1(G)f*g\in L^1(G) and FG(f∗g)=FG(f)FG(g)∈L1(G^)\mathscr{F}_G(f*g) =\mathscr{F}_G(f)\mathscr{F}_G(g)\in L^1(\widehat{G}), since FG(f)∈L1(G^)\mathscr{F}_G(f)\in L^1(\widehat{G}) and FG(g)∈C0(G^)\mathscr{F}_G(g)\in \mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}).

Theorem 3 02IW

The restriction of the Fourier transform to B(G) induces an isomorphism of vector spaces of B(G) onto B(G^)B(\widehat{G}), whose inverse is induced by the restriction of the co-Fourier transform to B(G^)B(\widehat{G}).

Let f∈B(G)f\in B(G). Put g=FG(f)g=\mathscr{F}_G(f). Then g∈L1(G^)∩C0(G^)⊂g\in L^1(\widehat{G})\cap \mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G})\subset L1(G^)∩L2(G^)L^1(\widehat{G})\cap L^2(\widehat{G}). Put f1=F‾G^(g)∈L2(G)f_1=\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(g)\in L^2(G). For every continuous function with compact support h∈K(G^)h\in \mathscr{K}(\widehat{G}), one has h∈L1(G^)∩L2(G^)h\in L^1(\widehat{G})\cap L^2(\widehat{G}) and

∫Gf1(x)FG^(h)(x)dx=∫GF‾G^(g)(x)F‾G^(h‾)(x)‾dx \int_Gf_1(x)\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(h)(x)dx=\int_G\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(g)(x)\overline{\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}(\overline{h})(x)}dx
=∫G^g(χ)h(χ)dx^(χ) =\int_{\widehat{G}}g(\chi )h(\chi )d\widehat{x}(\chi )
=∫G^FG(f)(χ)h(χ)dx^(χ)=∫Gf(x)FG^(h)(x)dx =\int_{\widehat{G}}\mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi )h(\chi )d\widehat{x}(\chi ) =\int_Gf(x)\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(h)(x)dx

by using the Plancherel theorem and formula (31). Since K(G^)\mathscr{K}(\widehat{G}) is dense in L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G}), its image under the Fourier transform is dense in L2(G)L^2(G). Consequently, one has f1=ff_1=f in L1(G)L^1(G); this proves that g∈B(G^)g\in B(\widehat{G}).

The formula f1=ff_1=f means that the restriction to B(G) of the composition F‾G^∘FG\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}}\circ \mathscr{F}_G is the identity mapping of B(G). By exchanging the roles of G and G^\widehat{G}, one sees that FG∘FG^\mathscr{F}_G\circ \mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}} is the identity mapping of B(G^)B(\widehat{G}), which completes the proof of the theorem.

Corollary 1 02IX

Let f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G). Then f∈B(G)f\in B(G) if and only if ff belongs to the image of the Fourier transform FG^\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}} on L1(G^)L^1(\widehat{G}). In particular, one has A(G)⊂B(G)A(G)\subset B(G).

Theorem 3 proves that if f∈B(G)f\in B(G), then f=FG^(F‾G(f))f=\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)), where FG(f)\mathscr{F}_G(f) belong to L1(G^)L^1(\widehat{G}). Conversely, if f=FG^(g)f=\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(g), where g∈L1(G^)g\in L^1(\widehat{G}), then one has g∈B(G^)g\in B(\widehat{G}) and therefore f∈B(G)f\in B(G) by the theorem. The last assertion then results from prop. 11 of II, p. 217.

Corollary 2 02IY

The vector space B(G) is an algebra both for multiplication and for convolution. The Fourier transform exchanges convolution and multiplication in B(G) and B(G^)B(\widehat{G}).

We have already seen that B(G) is a subalgebra of L1(G)L^1(G). On the other hand, if ff and gg belong to B(G), then fg∈L1(G)f g\in L^1(G) since f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) and gg belong to the image of the Fourier transform on L1(G^)L^1(\widehat{G}) (Corollary 1). Since there exist f1f_1 and g1g_1 in L1(G^)L^1(\widehat{G}) such that ff = FG^(f1)\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(f_1) and g=FG^(g1)g=\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(g_1) (loc. cit.), one has fg=FG^(f1∗g1)f g=\mathscr{F}_{\widehat{G}}(f_1*g_1), and therefore fg∈B(G)f g\in B(G) again by the preceding corollary.

Proposition 14 02IZ

Let ff and gg be in L2(G)L^2(G). Then FG(fg)=\mathscr{F}_G(f g) = FG(f)∗FG(g)\mathscr{F}_G(f)*\mathscr{F}_G(g).

The equality is true if ff and gg belong to B(G) (Corollary 2), and in particular if ff and gg belong to A(G) since A(G)⊂B(G)A(G)\subset B(G) (Cor. 1). Since A(G) is dense in L2(G)L^2(G) (Cor. 1 of II, p. 212), it is enough to prove that the two sides of the equality are continuous functions of (f,g)∈L2(G)×L2(G)(f, g)\in L^2(G)\times L^2(G) with values in C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}). Now the map (f,g)↦FG(fg)(f, g)\mapsto \mathscr{F}_G(f g) is obtained by composing the continuous map (f,g)↦fg(f, g)\mapsto f g of L2(G)×L2(G)L^2(G)\times L^2(G) into L1(G)L^1(G) and the Fourier transform FG\mathscr{F}_G of L1(G)L^1(G) into C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}), which is also continuous. Analogously, the map (f,g)↦FG(f)∗FG(g)(f, g)\mapsto \mathscr{F}_G(f)*\mathscr{F}_G(g) is obtained by composing the continuous maps (f,g)↦(FG(f),FG(g))(f, g)\mapsto (\mathscr{F}_G(f),\mathscr{F}_G(g)) of L2(G)×L2(G)L^2(G)\times L^2(G) into L2(G^)×L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G})\times L^2(\widehat{G}) and (h1,h2)↦h1∗h2(h_1, h_2)\mapsto h_1*h_2 of L2(G^)×L2(G^)L^2(\widehat{G})\times L^2(\widehat{G}) into C0(G^)\mathscr{C}_0(\widehat{G}) (INT, VIII, §4, no5^o5, prop. 15).

Remark 02J0

See no9^o9 and exercises 22 of II, p. 270 and 31 of II, p. 275 for other examples of function spaces on which the Fourier transform is an isomorphism, in the case of particular groups G.

6. Functorial properties of duality

Let G and H be commutative locally compact groups. Recall that if φ:G→H\varphi : G\rightarrow H is a morphism of topological groups, the dual morphism φ^:H^→G^\widehat{\varphi}:\widehat{H}\rightarrow \widehat{G} is defined by ⟨χ,φ(x)⟩=⟨φ^(χ),x⟩\langle \chi , \varphi (x)\rangle =\langle \widehat{\varphi}(\chi ), x\rangle for all χ∈H^\chi \in \widehat{H} and x∈Gx\in G. This definition shows that φ^^=φ\widehat{\widehat{\varphi}}=\varphi with the identifications of G (resp. H) and G^^\widehat{\widehat{G}} (resp. H^^\widehat{\widehat{H}}) of Theorem 2 of II, p. 220.

Let θ\theta be a mapping of G×HG\times H into U\mathbf{U}. For each x∈Gx\in G (resp. each y∈Hy\in H), let θx\theta_x (resp. θy\theta^y) be the function from G into U\mathbf{U} defined by y↦y\mapsto θ(x,y)\theta (x, y) (resp. the function from H into U\mathbf{U} defined by x↦θ(x,y)x\mapsto \theta (x, y)). Suppose that the mapping α:x↦θx\alpha :x\mapsto \theta_x is an isomorphism of the topological group G onto the topological group H^\widehat{H}. For every y∈Hy\in H and x∈Gx\in G, one has

θy(x)=θ(x,y)=⟨α(x),y⟩=⟨x,α^(y)⟩ \theta^y(x) =\theta (x, y) =\langle \alpha (x), y\rangle =\langle x,\widehat{\alpha}(y)\rangle

that is, θy=α^(y)\theta^y=\widehat{\alpha}(y). By Theorem 2 of II, p. 220, the mapping β:y↦θy\beta :y\mapsto \theta^y is therefore an isomorphism of the topological group H onto the topological group G^\widehat{G}. Under these conditions, we shall say that θ\theta puts G and H in duality, or that G and H are in duality relative to θ\theta. We shall then identify each of the groups G and H with the dual of the other. The Haar measure on H obtained by transport of structure from the dual measure of dxdx will be called the dual measure of the Haar measure dxdx.

Lemma 7 02J1

Let (Gi)i∈I(G_i)_{i\in I} and (Hi)i∈I(H_i)_{i\in I} be finite families of locally compact topological groups. For i∈Ii\in I, let θi:Gi×Hi→U\theta_i: G_i\times H_i\rightarrow \mathbf{U} be a mapping which puts the groups GiG_i and HiH_i in duality. The mapping θ\theta defined by

θ((gi),(hi))=∏i∈Iθi(gi,hi) \theta ((g_i),(h_i)) =\prod_{i\in I}\theta_i(g_i, h_i)

puts the groups ∏Gi\prod G_i and ∏Hi\prod H_i in duality.

This results from Proposition 2 of II, p. 206 and from the preceding definition.

Definition 5 02J2

Let G, H and K be topological groups. Let f:H→Gf: H\rightarrow G and g:G→Kg: G\rightarrow K be morphisms of topological groups. The pair (f,g)(f, g) is said to be an exact sequence of topological groups if it is an exact sequence of groups (A, II, p. 10, Remark 5) and if ff and gg are strict morphisms.

An exact sequence will be represented by the diagram

H⟶fG⟶gK H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K

and one will say that a diagram

G1⟶f1G2⟶f2G3→⋯→Gn⟶fnGn+1 G_1\longrightarrow^{f_1}G_2\longrightarrow^{f_2}G_3\rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow G_n\longrightarrow^{f_n}G_{n+1}

is exact if each pair (fi,fi+1)(f_i, f_{i+1}) for 1⩽i⩽n−11\leqslant i\leqslant n-1 is exact.

A sequence

1→H⟶fG⟶gK→1 1\rightarrow H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K\rightarrow 1

is exact if and only if ff is a strict injective morphism, gg is a strict surjective morphism, and the kernel of gg is equal to the image of ff. If K is separated, the image of ff is a closed subgroup of G.

Example 1 02J3

Let f:H→f: H\rightarrow G be a strict injective morphism whose image is a distinguished subgroup. The sequence

1→H⟶fG⟶pG/f(H)→1 1\rightarrow H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}G/f(H)\rightarrow 1

where pp is the canonical projection, is exact. In particular, if H is a closed distinguished subgroup of G, the sequence of topological groups

1→H⟶jG⟶pG/H→1 1\rightarrow H\overset{j}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}G/H\rightarrow 1

where jj is the inclusion and pp the canonical projection, is exact.

Example 2 02J4

Let g:G→Kg: G\rightarrow K be a strict surjective morphism. The sequence

1→1\rightarrow Ker(gg)⟶jG⟶gK→1\overset{j}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K\rightarrow 1,

where jj is the inclusion, is exact

Theorem 4 02J5

A sequence

H⟶fG⟶gK H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K

of commutative locally compact topological groups is exact if, and only if, the dual sequence

K^⟶^gG^⟶^fH^ \widehat{K}\widehat{\longrightarrow}^g\widehat{G}\widehat{\longrightarrow}^f\widehat{H}

is exact.

We shall begin by proving a few lemmas. It will be noted that each of them is moreover an easy consequence of the assertion of theorem 4.

Lemma 8 02J6

Let g:G→Kg: G\rightarrow K be a morphism of commutative locally compact topological groups. If the morphism gg is surjective and strict, then g^\widehat{g} is injective and strict.

Since gg is surjective, the morphism g^\widehat{g} is injective (lemma 2 of II, p. 205). To prove that g^\widehat{g} is a strict morphism, it is enough to prove that for every neighbourhood U of ee in K^\widehat{K}, there exists a neighbourhood V of ee in G^\widehat{G} such that g^−1(V)⊂U\overset{-1}{\widehat{g}}(V)\subset U (lemma 2 of II, p. 200). Let U be such a neighbourhood of ee in K^\widehat{K}. By definition of the topology of K^\widehat{K}, there exist a compact subset X of K and a number ε>0\varepsilon >0 such that U contains the set of z^∈K^\widehat{z}\in \widehat{K} which, for every z∈Xz\in X, satisfy ∣⟨z^,z⟩−1∣<ε|\langle \widehat{z}, z\rangle -1|< \varepsilon. Since gg is strict and surjective, there exists, by TG, I, p. 80, prop. 10, a compact subset X0X_0 of G such that g(X0)=Xg(X_0) = X. Let V be the neighbourhood of ee in G^\widehat{G} formed by the elements χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} such that,

for every x∈X0x\in X_0, one has ∣⟨χ,x⟩−1∣<ε|\langle \chi , x\rangle -1|< \varepsilon. One then has g^−1(V)⊂U\overset{-1}{\widehat{g}}(V)\subset U. This proves the assertion.

Lemma 9 02J7

Let f:H→Gf: H\rightarrow G be a morphism of locally compact topological groups. If the morphism ff is injective and strict, then f^\widehat{f} is surjective and strict.

Suppose that ff is injective and strict. The morphism f^\widehat{f} induces by passing to the quotient a morphism q:G^/q:\widehat{G}/ Ker(f^\widehat{f})→H^\rightarrow \widehat{H}. What has to be proved is that this is an isomorphism of topological groups; by duality, it is enough for this to prove that its dual q^\widehat{q} is an isomorphism.

Let L denote the dual group of G^/\widehat{G}/ Ker(f^\widehat{f}) and p:G^→G^/p:\widehat{G}\rightarrow \widehat{G}/ Ker(f^\widehat{f}) the canonical projection. We shall first prove that p^\widehat{p} induces, by passing to subspaces, an isomorphism of L onto f(H)f(H).

One has q∘p=f^q\circ p=\widehat{f}, whence p^∘q^=f\widehat{p}\circ \widehat{q}=f. The image of p^\widehat{p} therefore contains f(H)f(H).

Since ff is strict, its image f(H)f(H) is a locally compact subgroup of G, and is therefore closed (TG, III, p. 22, cor. 2). Let K = G/f(H)G/f(H) and consider the exact sequence

1→H⟶fG⟶gK→1 1\rightarrow H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K\rightarrow 1

associated (Example 1). By duality, the morphism f^∘g^\widehat{f}\circ \widehat{g} is trivial and therefore the image of g^\widehat{g} is contained in Ker(f^\widehat{f}) == Ker(pp). Thus p∘g^p\circ \widehat{g} is the trivial morphism and, again by duality, g∘p^g\circ \widehat{p} is also trivial. It follows that the image of p^\widehat{p} is contained in the kernel of gg, which is equal to f(H)f(H). One concludes that the image of p^\widehat{p} is equal to f(H)f(H).

Moreover, since pp is a strict surjective morphism, the dual morphism p^\widehat{p} is a strict injective morphism of L into G (Lemma 8). It follows that p^\widehat{p} induces a topological group isomorphism of L onto f(H)f(H). Since p^∘q^=f\widehat{p}\circ \widehat{q}=f, and ff induces an isomorphism of H onto its image f(H)f(H), the morphism q^\widehat{q} is an isomorphism.

Lemma 10 02J8

Let

H⟶fG⟶gK H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K

be an exact sequence of commutative locally compact groups. The kernel of f^\widehat{f} is equal to the image of g^\widehat{g}.

The homomorphism f^∘g^\widehat{f}\circ \widehat{g} is trivial by duality, hence the image of g^\widehat{g} is contained in the kernel of f^\widehat{f}. Conversely, let χ\chi be in the kernel of f^\widehat{f}. This means that Im(ff) == Ker(gg) is contained in the kernel of χ\chi, hence that there exists a character η\eta of Im(gg) such that η∘g=χ\eta \circ g=\chi. Since the inclusion of Im(gg) into K is strict, the dual restriction mapping of characters of K to Im(gg) is surjective (Lemma 9). There therefore exists a character β\beta of K such that η\eta is the restriction of β\beta, and then χ=β∘g=g^(β)\chi =\beta \circ g=\widehat{g}(\beta ). One concludes that the kernel of f^\widehat{f} is contained in the image of g^\widehat{g}.

Let us now prove Theorem 4. By duality, it is enough to prove that the sequence K^⟶^gG^⟶^fH^\widehat{K}\widehat{\longrightarrow}^g\widehat{G}\widehat{\longrightarrow}^f\widehat{H} is exact when the sequence H⟶fG⟶gKH\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K is so. Now, by Lemmas 8 and 9, the morphisms f^\widehat{f} and g^\widehat{g} are strict, and by Lemma 10, the kernel of f^\widehat{f} is equal to the image of g^\widehat{g}.

Corollary 1 02J9

Let

1→H⟶fG⟶gK→1 1\rightarrow H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K\rightarrow 1

be an exact sequence of commutative locally compact topological groups. The morphism g^\widehat{g} induces an isomorphism between K^\widehat{K} and f(H)⊥f(H)^{\bot}, and f^\widehat{f} induces by passing to the quotient an isomorphism between G^/f(H)⊥\widehat{G}/f(H)^{\bot} and H^\widehat{H}.

By Theorem 4, the sequence

1→K^⟶^gG^⟶^fH^→1(32) 1\rightarrow \widehat{K}\widehat{\longrightarrow}^g\widehat{G}\widehat{\longrightarrow}^f\widehat{H}\rightarrow 1 \tag{32}

is exact. The morphism g^\widehat{g} therefore induces an isomorphism of K^\widehat{K} onto Ker(f^\widehat{f}) =f(H)⊥=f(H)^{\bot} (Lemma 2 of II, p. 205), and f^\widehat{f} induces by passing to the quotient an isomorphism of G^/Ker(f^)=G^/f(H)⊥\widehat{G}/Ker(\widehat{f}) =\widehat{G}/f(H)^{\bot} onto H^(\widehat{H}(loc. cit.).

Corollary 2 02JA

Let f:G→Hf: G\rightarrow H be a morphism of locally compact commutative topological groups. The morphism ff is strict if and only if f^\widehat{f} is strict.

In view of the canonical decomposition (E, II, p. 44) of a strict morphism, this follows from Lemmas 8 and 9.

Corollary 3 02JB

Let H be a subgroup of G. Then (H⊥)⊥=H(H^{\bot})^{\bot}= H.

Since H⊥H^{\bot} = H‾⊥\overline{H}^{\bot}, we may suppose that H is closed. Let f:H→Gf: H\rightarrow G be the canonical injection and p:G→G/Hp: G\rightarrow G/H the canonical projection. We have H⊥=H^{\bot}= Ker(f^\widehat{f}) (Lemma 10). Let kk be the canonical injection of H⊥H^{\bot} into G^\widehat{G}. By Theorem 4, the morphism p^\widehat{p} induces an isomorphism p^H:G^/H→H⊥\widehat{p}_H:\widehat{G}/H\rightarrow H^{\bot} of topological groups and we have k∘p^H=p^k\circ \widehat{p}_H=\widehat{p}. Consequently (Corollary 1), we obtain

(H⊥)⊥=(H^{\bot})^{\bot}= Ker(k^\widehat{k}) == Ker( p^^H∘k^\widehat{\widehat{p}}_H\circ \widehat{k}) == Ker(pp) =H= H.

Corollary 4 02JC

Let I be a set and let (Hi)i∈I(H_i)_{i\in I} be a family of closed subgroups of G. The orthogonal of the closed subgroup generated by the HiH_i is ⋂i∈IHi⊥\bigcap_{i\in I}H^{\bot}_i. The orthogonal of ⋂iHi\bigcap_iH_i is the closed subgroup generated by the subgroups Hi⊥H^{\bot}_i.

The first assertion follows from the definition of the orthogonal. Applying this result and Corollary 3 to the family of closed subgroups (Hi⊥)i∈I(H^{\bot}_i)_{i\in I} of G^\widehat{G}, we see that ⋂iHi\bigcap_iH_i is the orthogonal of the closed subgroup generated by the subgroups Hi⊥H^{\bot}_i, and the second assertion is then obtained by duality.

Corollary 5 02JD

Let φ:G→H\varphi : G\rightarrow H be a morphism of locally compact commutative groups. Then the subgroup Im(φ\varphi ) of H and the subgroup Ker(φ^\widehat{\varphi}) of H^\widehat{H} are orthogonal to one another. In particular, in order that φ^\widehat{\varphi} be injective, it is necessary and sufficient that the image of φ\varphi be dense in H.

We have Ker(φ^\widehat{\varphi}) =φ(G)⊥=\varphi (G)^{\bot} (Lemma 2 of II, p. 205), whence the result by Corollary 3.

Corollary 6 02JE

Let k∈Zk\in \mathbf{Z}. Then the kernel of the homomorphism x↦xkx\mapsto x^k of G into G and the closure of the image of the morphism χ↦χk\chi \mapsto \chi^k of G^\widehat{G} into G^\widehat{G} are orthogonal to one another.

This follows from the preceding Corollary since the morphisms x↦xkx\mapsto x^k of G into G and χ↦χk\chi \mapsto \chi^k of G^\widehat{G} into G^\widehat{G} are dual to one another.

Recall (A, X, p. 17) that a commutative group A is divisible if, for every nonzero n∈Zn\in \mathbf{Z}, the mapping a↦ana\mapsto a^n of A into A is surjective.

Corollary 7 02JF

Let G be a locally compact commutative group.

a) If G is divisible, then the dual group G^\widehat{G} is torsion-free ;

b) If the dual group G^\widehat{G} is torsion-free, and if k∈Zk\in \mathbf{Z} is nonzero, then the image of the homomorphism x↦xkx\mapsto x^k of G into G is dense in G ;

c) Suppose G discrete or compact. For G to be divisible it is necessary and sufficient that G^\widehat{G} be torsion-free.

Assertions a) and b) follow from Cor. 6. If G is discrete or compact, the image of the morphism x↦xkx\mapsto x^k of G into G is closed, and c) follows from a) and b).

Remark 02JG

There exist commutative locally compact groups G which are not divisible and such that G^\widehat{G} is torsion-free (Exercise 63 of II, p. 299).

7. The Poisson formula

In this No., we consider a closed subgroup H of G. We denote by β=dx\beta =dx the Haar measure on G and by β^\widehat{\beta} the dual Haar measure on G^\widehat{G}. We denote by α\alpha a Haar measure on H and by α^\widehat{\alpha} the dual Haar measure on the dual group H^\widehat{H}, which is identified with G^/H⊥\widehat{G}/H^{\bot} (Theorem 4 of II, p. 226). We also identify G^/H\widehat{G}/H with H⊥H^{\bot} by the dual mapping of the canonical projection G→G/HG\rightarrow G/H (loc. cit.).

We shall denote by x˙\dot{x} the canonical image of an element xx of G in G/HG/H and by χ˙\dot{\chi} the canonical image of an element χ\chi of G^\widehat{G} in G^/H⊥\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}.

We denote by γ\gamma the Haar measure β/α\beta /\alpha on G/HG/H (INT, VII, §2, no2^o2, Def. 1 and no7^o7, Prop. 10), and by γ^\widehat{\gamma} the dual Haar measure on H⊥H^{\bot}. Recall (INT, VII, §2, no3^o3, Prop. 5, c)) that the measure γ\gamma is characterised by the following property: for every f∈L1(G)f\in \mathscr{L}^1(G), the function y↦f(xy)y\mapsto f(xy) on H is α\alpha-integrable for β\beta-almost every x∈Gx\in G ; its integral depends only on x˙\dot{x} and the function defined γ\gamma-almost everywhere on G/HG/H by

f♭:x˙↦∫Hf(xh)dα(h) f^{\flat}: \dot{x}\mapsto \int_Hf(xh)d\alpha (h)

belongs to L1(G/H,γ)L^1(G/H, \gamma ) and satisfies

∫G/Hf♭dγ=∫Gfdβ(33) \int_{G/H}f^{\flat}d\gamma =\int_Gf d\beta \tag{33}

Proposition 15 02JH

Let f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) be such that the restriction to H⊥H^{\bot} of the continuous function FG(f)\mathscr{F}_G(f) is integrable with respect to γ^\widehat{\gamma}. Then, for almost every x∈Gx\in G, the function y↦f(xy)y\mapsto f(xy) on H is α\alpha-integrable, and one has:

∫Hf(xy)dα(y)=∫H⊥⟨χ,x⟩FG(f)(χ)dγ^(χ) \int_Hf(xy)d\alpha (y) =\int_{H^{\bot}}\langle \chi , x\rangle \mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi )d\widehat{\gamma}(\chi )

From the above, the function f♭f^{\flat} defined almost everywhere on G/HG/H by

f♭(x˙)=∫Hf(xy)dα(y) f^{\flat}( \dot{x}) =\int_Hf(xy)d\alpha (y)

belongs to L1(G/H)L^1(G/H). The Fourier transform of f♭f^{\flat} is identified with the function on H⊥=G^/HH^{\bot}=\widehat{G}/H given for χ∈H⊥\chi \in H^{\bot} by

FG/H(f♭)(χ)=∫G/H⟨χ,x˙⟩‾f♭(x˙)dγ(x˙) \mathscr{F}_{G/H}(f^{\flat})(\chi ) =\int_{G/H}\overline{\langle\chi ,\dot{x}\rangle}f^{\flat}( \dot{x})d\gamma ( \dot{x})
=∫G⟨χ,x⟩‾f(x)dβ(x)=FG(f)(χ) =\int_G\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}f(x)d\beta (x) =\mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi )

by formula (33), applied to the integrable function x↦x\mapsto ⟨χ,x⟩‾f(x)\overline{\langle\chi , x\rangle}f(x). By hypothesis, the function F(f)∣H⊥=FG/H(f♭)\mathscr{F}(f)|H^{\bot}=\mathscr{F}_{G/H}(f^{\flat}) belong to L1(H⊥)L^1(H^{\bot}), and therefore the function f♭f^{\flat} belong to the space B(G/H)B(G/H). It follows (Theorem 3 of II, p. 222) that f♭f^{\flat} coincides almost everywhere with F‾G^/H(FG/H(f♭))\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}/H}(\mathscr{F}_{G/H}(f^{\flat})). For almost all x˙∈G/H\dot{x}\in G/H, one therefore has

f♭(x˙)=∫H⊥⟨χ,x⟩FG/H(f♭)(χ)dγ^(χ)=∫H⊥⟨χ,x⟩FG(f)(χ)dγ^(χ) f^{\flat}( \dot{x}) =\int_{H^{\bot}}\langle \chi , x\rangle \mathscr{F}_{G/H}(f^{\flat})(\chi )d\widehat{\gamma}(\chi ) =\int_{H^{\bot}}\langle \chi , x\rangle \mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi )d\widehat{\gamma}(\chi )

This completes the proof.

Corollary (Poisson Formula) 02JI

Let f∈L1(G)f\in \mathscr{L}^1(G). Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:

(i) The restriction of FG(f)\mathscr{F}_G(f) to H⊥H^{\bot} is integrable;

(ii) For every x∈Gx\in G, the function y↦f(xy)y\mapsto f(xy) on H is integrable;

(iii) The mapping x↦∫Hf(xy)dα(y)x\mapsto \int_Hf(xy)d\alpha (y) is continuous on G.

Then one has

∫Hf(y)dα(y)=∫H⊥FG(f)(χ)dγ^(χ)(34) \int_Hf(y)d\alpha (y) =\int_{H^{\bot}}\mathscr{F}_G(f)(\chi )d\widehat{\gamma}(\chi ) \tag{34}

Indeed, with the notation of the proof of the preceding proposition, the functions f♭f^{\flat} and F‾G^/H(FG/H(f♭))\overline{\mathscr{F}}_{\widehat{G}/H}(\mathscr{F}_{G/H}(f^{\flat})) on G/HG/H are continuous and equal almost everywhere. They are therefore equal everywhere and in particular at ee, which gives formula (34).

Proposition 16 02JJ

The measure α^\widehat{\alpha} on H^=G^/H⊥\widehat{H} =\widehat{G}/H^{\bot} is equal to β/^γ^\widehat{\beta /}\widehat{\gamma}.

Let us fix a nonzero f∈K(G)f\in \mathscr{K}(G). For x∈Gx\in G and χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, put

φ(x,χ)=∫Hf(xy)⟨χ,y⟩dα(y) \varphi (x, \chi ) =\int_Hf(xy)\langle \chi , y\rangle d\alpha (y)

The function φ\varphi is continuous on G×G^G\times \widehat{G} (INT, IV, §4, no3^o3, cor. 1 of Theorem 2). For fixed xx, φ(x,χ)\varphi (x, \chi ) depends only on the class of χ\chi in G^/H⊥=H^\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}=\widehat{H}. For fixed χ\chi, ⟨χ,x⟩φ(x,χ)\langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (x, \chi ) depends only on the class of xx in G/HG/H, and the function x˙↦⟨χ,x⟩φ(x,χ)\dot{x}\mapsto \langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (x, \chi ) on G/HG/H has compact support.

Let x∈Gx\in G. The function χ˙↦φ(x,χ)\dot{\chi}\mapsto \varphi (x, \chi ) on H^\widehat{H} is the Fourier cotransform of the function y↦f(xy)y\mapsto f(xy) on H. The latter is square-integrable, hence by the Plancherel formula (23) of II, p. 217, one has

∫G^/H⊥∣φ(x,χ)∣2dα^(χ˙)=∫H∣f(xy)∣2dα(y)(35) \int_{\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}}|\varphi (x, \chi )|^2d\widehat{\alpha}( \dot{\chi}) =\int_H|f(xy)|^2d\alpha (y) \tag{35}

Let χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}. The function x˙↦⟨χ,x⟩φ(x,χ)\dot{x}\mapsto \langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (x, \chi ) belongs to K(G/H)\mathscr{K}(G/H), hence to L1(G/H)L^1(G/H). Its Fourier cotransform is the function on H⊥H^{\bot} whose value at ξ∈H⊥\xi \in H^{\bot} is

∫G/H⟨ξ,x˙⟩⟨χ,x⟩φ(x,χ)dγ(x˙)=∫G/H(∫H⟨χξ,xy⟩f(xy)dα(y))dγ(x˙) \int_{G/H}\langle \xi ,\dot{x}\rangle \langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (x, \chi )d\gamma ( \dot{x}) =\int_{G/H}(\int_H\langle \chi \xi , xy\rangle f(xy)d\alpha (y))d\gamma ( \dot{x})
=∫G⟨χξ,x⟩f(x)dβ(x)=F‾G(f)(χξ) =\int_G\langle \chi \xi , x\rangle f(x)d\beta (x) =\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)(\chi \xi )

by formula (33). Therefore

∫G/H∣φ(x,χ)∣2dγ(x˙)=∫H⊥∣F‾G(f)(χξ)∣2dγ^(ξ)(36) \int_{G/H}|\varphi (x, \chi )|^2d\gamma ( \dot{x}) =\int_{H^{\bot}}|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)(\chi \xi )|^2d\widehat{\gamma}(\xi ) \tag{36}

by the Plancherel formula again.

One then finally computes

∫G^∣F‾G(f)∣2dβ^=∫G∣f∣2dβ\int_{\widehat{G}}|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)|^2d\widehat{\beta}=\int_G|f|^2d\beta (by (23))

=∫G/Hdγ(x˙)∫H∣f(xy)∣2dα(y)=\int_{G/H}d\gamma ( \dot{x})\int_H|f(xy)|^2d\alpha (y) (by (33))

=∫G/Hdγ(x˙)∫G^/H⊥∣φ(x,χ)∣2dα^(χ˙)=\int_{G/H}d\gamma ( \dot{x})\int_{\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}}|\varphi (x, \chi )|^2d\widehat{\alpha}( \dot{\chi}) (by (35))

=∫G^/H⊥dα^(χ˙)∫G/H∣φ(x,χ)∣2dγ(x˙) =\int_{\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}}d\widehat{\alpha}( \dot{\chi})\int_{G/H}|\varphi (x, \chi )|^2d\gamma ( \dot{x})

=∫G^/H⊥dα^(χ˙)∫H⊥∣F‾G(f)(χξ)∣2dγ^(ξ)=\int_{\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}}d\widehat{\alpha}( \dot{\chi})\int_{H^{\bot}}|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)(\chi \xi )|^2d\widehat{\gamma}(\xi ) (by (36)),

where INT, V, §8, No.o3^o3, prop. 5 has been applied to the positive continuous function (x˙,χ˙)↦∣φ(x,χ)∣2( \dot{x},\dot{\chi})\mapsto |\varphi (x, \chi )|^2 on G/H×G^/H⊥G/H\times \widehat{G}/H^{\bot}.

Comparing this equality with the integration formula (33) for the group G^\widehat{G}, one then concludes that the Haar measures α^\widehat{\alpha} and β/^γ^\widehat{\beta /}\widehat{\gamma} coincide.

8. Examples of duality

Proposition 17 02JK

Let n⩾1n\geqslant 1 be an integer. Let us denote by μn\boldsymbol{\mu}_n the group of nn-th roots of unity in C\mathbf{C}. The groups Z/nZ\mathbf{Z}/n\mathbf{Z} and μn\boldsymbol{\mu}_n are in duality relative to the mapping induced by passing to the quotient from the mapping Z×μn→U\mathbf{Z}\times \boldsymbol{\mu}_n\rightarrow \mathbf{U} defined by (m,z)↦zm(m, z)\mapsto z^m.

The group Z/n^Z\mathbf{Z}\widehat{/n}\mathbf{Z} coincides with the set of homomorphisms χ\chi of Z/nZ\mathbf{Z}/n\mathbf{Z} into U\mathbf{U}. These are of the form m↦χ(1)mm\mapsto \chi (1)^m, where χ(1)\chi (1) is an arbitrary element of U\mathbf{U} such that χ(1)n=1\chi (1)^n= 1, whence the result.

Corollary 1 02JL

Let G be a finite commutative group. The dual group G^\widehat{G} is isomorphic to G.

The group G is isomorphic to a finite product of cyclic groups (A, VII, p. 22, th. 3), and its dual group is isomorphic to the product of the dual groups of these (prop. 2 of II, p. 206). One is therefore reduced to the case where G is cyclic, which comes under proposition 17 since the group μn\boldsymbol{\mu}_n is cyclic of order nn (A, V, p. 75, th. 1).

Corollary 2 02JM

Let G be a locally compact commutative group. The group G is finite if and only if G^\widehat{G} is finite. A closed subgroup H of G is of finite index if and only if its orthogonal is finite.

By duality, the first assertion follows from the fact that the dual of a finite group is finite (corollary 1). The second results from it, since G^/H\widehat{G}/H is identified with H⊥H^{\bot} (th. 4 of II, p. 226).

Proposition 18 02JN

In order that G^\widehat{G} be compact, it is necessary and sufficient that G be discrete. If G is discrete, the dual measure of the counting measure on G is the normalised Haar measure on G^\widehat{G}. If G is compact, the dual measure of the normalised Haar measure is the counting measure on G^\widehat{G}.

Suppose G discrete, and let α\alpha be the counting measure on G. Let φ\varphi be the characteristic function of e∈Ge\in G. One has FG(φ)=1\mathscr{F}_G(\varphi ) = 1 on G^\widehat{G}. Since FG(φ)\mathscr{F}_G(\varphi ) tends to 0 at infinity, the group G^\widehat{G} is compact.

Moreover, for the dual measure α^\widehat{\alpha} of α\alpha, the function FG(φ)\mathscr{F}_G(\varphi ) must have integral φ(e)=1\varphi (e) = 1 (prop. 12 of II, p. 219). Hence α^(G^)=1\widehat{\alpha}(\widehat{G}) = 1.

Suppose G compact. Then the Haar measure dxdx belong to M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G). Its Fourier transform is strictly positive at χ=e\chi =e and zero for χ≠0\chi \not= 0 (prop. 6 of II, p. 210). Since it is continuous on G^\widehat{G}, the group G^\widehat{G} is discrete. If the measure of G is 1, one deduces by duality from the preceding case that the dual measure of the measure dxdx is the counting measure on G^\widehat{G}.

Corollary 1 (Orthogonality relations) 02JO

Suppose G discrete and endowed with the counting measure. For xx and yy in G, one has

∫\int 0 if x≠yx\not=y

χ(x)χ(y)dχ= \chi (x)\chi (y)d\chi =

G^_{\widehat{G}} 1 if x=yx=y.

This results from the cor. to th. 1 of II, p. 215 and from duality.

Corollary 2 02JP

Let H be a closed subgroup of G.

a) In order that H be compact, it is necessary and sufficient that H⊥H^{\bot} be open in G^\widehat{G} ;

b) In order that H be open, it is necessary and sufficient that H⊥H^{\bot} be compact in G^\widehat{G}.

a) To say that H⊥H^{\bot} is open amounts to saying that G^/H⊥\widehat{G}/H^{\bot} is discrete, now G^/H⊥\widehat{G}/H^{\bot} is isomorphic to H^\widehat{H} (Theorem 4 of II, p. 226); the assertion therefore follows from Proposition 18. Assertion b) results by duality from assertion a) applied to H⊥H^{\bot}.

Corollary 3 02JQ

Let (Hi)i∈I(H_i)_{i\in I} be a decreasing filtered family of compact subgroups of G. In order that G be identified with the projective limit of the groups G/HiG/H_i, it is necessary and sufficient that G^\widehat{G} be the union of the open subgroups Hi⊥H^{\bot}_i.

To say that G is identified with the projective limit of the G/HiG/H_i amounts to saying that ⋂iHi={e}\bigcap_iH_i=\{e\} (TG, III, p. 60, Proposition 2), that is, that ⋃iHi⊥\bigcup_iH^{\bot}_i is dense in G^\widehat{G} (Corollary 4 of Theorem 4 of II, p. 226). Now ⋃iHi⊥\bigcup_iH^{\bot}_i is an open subgroup, hence closed, of G^\widehat{G}.

Corollary 4 02JR

Let I be a set and let (Hi)i∈I(H_i)_{i\in I} be a family of compact groups. The dual of the product group of the HiH_i is the discrete direct sum group of the groups H^i\widehat{H}_i.

This is a particular case of Corollary 3.

Proposition 19 02JS

Let K be a locally compact non-discrete field, not necessarily commutative, and let G be the additive group of K, whose group law is denoted additively. Let χ\chi be a unitary character of G distinct from 1. For x,y∈Gx, y\in G, put θ(x,y)=χ(xy)\theta (x, y) =\chi (xy). Then G is in duality with itself relative to θ\theta.

For y∈Gy\in G, let χy\chi_y be the mapping of G into U\mathbf{U} such that χy(x)=\chi_y(x) = χ(xy)\chi (xy). We have χy∈G^\chi_y\in \widehat{G}, and it is necessary to prove that β:y↦χy\beta :y\mapsto \chi_y is an isomorphism of topological groups of G onto G^\widehat{G}.

The map β\beta is an injective homomorphism of G into G^\widehat{G}; it is continuous (TG, X, p. 28, Theorem 3 applied to the continuous map θ\theta of G×GG\times G into C\mathbf{C}). Let us prove that θ\theta is a homeomorphism onto its image. It is enough (Lemma 2 of II, p. 200) to prove that for every neighbourhood U of 0 in K, there exists a neighbourhood V of ee in G^\widehat{G} such that β−1(V)⊂U\overset{-1}{\beta}(V)\subset U. Let x↦∣x∣x\mapsto |x| be an absolute value on K defining the topology of K (AC, VI, §9, Noo1^o1, Proposition 1), and let x0∈Kx_0\in K be such that χ(x0)≠1\chi (x_0)\not= 1; let us set η=∣χ(x0)−1∣>0\eta =|\chi (x_0)-1|>0. Let U be a neighbourhood of 0 in K. There exists δ>0\delta >0 such that U contains the set of y∈Ky\in K such that ∣y∣<δ|y|< \delta. Let V be the set of characters ξ∈G^\xi \in \widehat{G} such that ∣⟨ξ,x⟩−1∣<η|\langle \xi , x\rangle -1|< \eta for every element x∈Kx\in K satisfying ∣x∣⩽∣x0∣/δ|x|\leqslant |x_0|/\delta. This is a neighbourhood of ee in G^\widehat{G}. If y≠0y\not= 0 is such that β(y)\beta (y) belongs to V, we therefore have ∣χ(xy)−1∣<∣χ(x0)−1∣|\chi (xy)-1|<|\chi (x_0)-1| for every xx such that ∣x∣⩽∣x0∣/δ|x|\leqslant |x_0|/\delta. Consequently, we have ∣x0y−1∣>∣x0∣/δ|x_0y^{-1}|>|x_0|/\delta, and therefore ∣y∣<δ|y|< \delta, so that y∈Uy\in U.

Since β\beta is a homeomorphism onto its image, the latter is closed in G^\widehat{G} (TG, III, p. 22, Corollary 2). But moreover the orthogonal of the image of β\beta is the set of elements xx of G such that χ(xy)=1\chi (xy) = 1 for all y∈Gy\in G, and is therefore reduced to {0}\{0\}. The image of β\beta is therefore dense in G^\widehat{G} (Corollary 3 of II, p. 228). We conclude that β\beta is surjective.

Corollary 1 02JT

Let K be a locally compact non-discrete field not necessarily commutative and χ\chi a nontrivial unitary character of the additive group of K. Let E be a finite-dimensional topological vector space over K. The map θ\theta of E×E′E\times E' into U\mathbf{U} defined by θ(x,λ)=χ(⟨λ,x⟩)\theta (x, \lambda ) =\chi (\langle \lambda , x\rangle ) for (λ,x)∈E′×E(\lambda , x)\in E'\times E puts the topological groups E and E′E' in duality.

Let nn be the dimension of E and (e1,...,en)(e_1, . . . , e_n) a basis of E. It makes it possible to identify E and KnK^n (EVT, I, p. 14, Theorem 2). The result then follows from Proposition 19 and Proposition 2 of II, p. 206.

We denote by T\mathbf{T} the group R/Z\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z}.

Corollary 2 02JU

a) The group R\mathbf{R} is in duality with itself relative to the map (x,y)↦(x, y)\mapsto exp(2iπxyi\pi xy), and the dual measure of Lebesgue measure is Lebesgue measure ;

b) The groups Z\mathbf{Z} and T\mathbf{T} are in duality with respect to the mapping obtained by passing to the quotient from the mapping of Z×R\mathbf{Z}\times \mathbf{R} into U\mathbf{U} such that (n,x)↦(n, x)\mapsto exp(2iπnxi\pi nx). The dual Haar measure of the counting measure on Z\mathbf{Z} is the normalised Haar measure on R/Z\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z}.

The group R\mathbf{R} is in duality with itself with respect to the mapping (x,y)↦(x, y)\mapsto exp(2iπxyi\pi xy), by Proposition 19. Let us identify R^\widehat{\mathbf{R}} with R\mathbf{R}. The orthogonal of Z\mathbf{Z} in R^=R\widehat{\mathbf{R}}=\mathbf{R} is then Z\mathbf{Z}, and b) results from Theorem 4 of II, p. 226.

Let α\alpha be the counting measure on Z\mathbf{Z} and γ\gamma the normalised Haar measure on T\mathbf{T}. If β\beta denotes Lebesgue measure on R\mathbf{R}, one has γ=β/α\gamma =\beta /\alpha, since these two Haar measures on R/Z\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z} have mass 1. The Haar measure α^\widehat{\alpha} on Z^=T\widehat{\mathbf{Z}}=\mathbf{T} is the normalised Haar measure (Proposition 18), and the Haar measure γ^\widehat{\gamma} is the counting measure on Z(\mathbf{Z}(loc. cit.). By Proposition 16 of II, p. 231, the dual measure of β\beta is therefore the measure β\beta.

Remark 02JV

In particular one recovers the determination of X(L1(Z))\mathsf{X}(L^1(\mathbf{Z})) given in Example 4 of I, p. 36.

For every integer n⩾0n\geqslant 0 and (x,y)∈Rn×Rn(x, y)\in \mathbf{R}^n\times \mathbf{R}^n, we write

x⋅y=∑j=1nxjyj x\cdot y=\sum_{j=1}^nx_jy_j

Corollary 3 02JW

Let n⩾1n\geqslant 1 be an integer. The group Rn\mathbf{R}^n is in duality with itself with respect to the mapping (x,y)↦(x, y)\mapsto exp(2iπx⋅yi\pi x\cdot y), and the dual measure of Lebesgue measure on Rn\mathbf{R}^n is Lebesgue measure. The groups Zn\mathbf{Z}^n and Tn=Rn/Zn\mathbf{T}^n=\mathbf{R}^n/\mathbf{Z}^n are in duality with respect to the mapping obtained by passing to the quotient from the mapping (n,x)↦(n, x)\mapsto exp(2iπx⋅yi\pi x\cdot y), and the dual Haar measure of the counting measure on Zn\mathbf{Z}^n is the normalised Haar measure on (R/Z)n(\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z})^n.

This results from Lemma 7 of II, p. 225, Proposition 10 of II, p. 217 and Corollary 2.

Remark 02JX

Given a subgroup H of Rn\mathbf{R}^n, there corresponds to it its orthogonal H⊥H^{\bot}, a subgroup of R^n=Rn\widehat{\mathbf{R}}^n=\mathbf{R}^n, which is none other than the subgroup associated with H defined in TG, VII, p. 6, no3^o3.

In the sequel, one will identify the dual of Rn\mathbf{R}^n (resp. of Tn\mathbf{T}^n) with Rn\mathbf{R}^n (resp. with Zn\mathbf{Z}^n) by the duality of the corollary. In particular, for f∈L1(Rn)f\in L^1(\mathbf{R}^n), its Fourier transform is identified with the function from Rn\mathbf{R}^n into C\mathbf{C} which to y∈Rny\in \mathbf{R}^n associates

F(f)(y)=∫Rnf(x)\mathscr{F}(f)(y) =\int_{\mathbf{R}^n}f(x) exp(−2iπx⋅y-2i\pi x\cdot y)dxdx.

Corollary 4 02JY

The group R∗\mathbf{R}^* is in duality with the group {−1,1}×R\{-1,1\} \times \mathbf{R} by the mapping (x,(σ,t))↦σ(x/∣x∣)∣x∣it(x,(\sigma , t))\mapsto \sigma (x/|x|)|x|^{it}. The group R+∗\mathbf{R}^*_+ is in duality with R\mathbf{R} by the mapping (x,t)↦xit(x, t)\mapsto x^{it}.

In fact, the mapping x↦(x/∣x∣x\mapsto (x/|x|, log(∣x∣|x|)) is a topological group isomorphism of R∗\mathbf{R}^* onto {−1,1}×R\{-1,1\} \times \mathbf{R}. The assertion then follows from lemma 7 of II, p. 225, from corollary 2, and from the fact that the unitary characters of {−1,1}\{-1,1\} are 1 and x↦xx\mapsto x.

Let pp be a prime number. The field Qp\mathbf{Q}_p of pp-adic numbers is the completion of Q\mathbf{Q} for the pp-adic valuation (INT, VII, § 1, No.o6^o6, example, and AC, VI, § 3, No.o4^o4, example 4). For every x∈Qpx\in \mathbf{Q}_p, there exist a unique integer ν⩾0\nu \geqslant 0 and a unique integer qq satisfying 0⩽q<pν0\leqslant q < p^{\nu} such that qp−ν−x∈Zpqp^{-\nu}-x\in \mathbf{Z}_p (A, VII, p. 10, Theorem 2, applied to the principal ideal domain Zp\mathbf{Z}_p and to the set RpR_p of integers jj such that 0⩽j<p0\leqslant j < p). We put λ(x)=qp−ν\lambda (x) =qp^{-\nu}.

Proposition 20 02JZ

The mapping x↦x\mapsto exp(2iπλ(x)i\pi \lambda (x)) is a unitary character of Qp\mathbf{Q}_p whose kernel is Zp\mathbf{Z}_p.

For x1x_1 and x2x_2 in Qp\mathbf{Q}_p, one has by definition λ(x1+x2)−λ(x1)−λ(x2)∈\lambda (x_1+x_2)-\lambda (x_1)-\lambda (x_2)\in Zp∩Q=Z\mathbf{Z}_p\cap \mathbf{Q}=\mathbf{Z}. The mapping λ\lambda is moreover locally constant since λ(x+y)=λ(x)\lambda (x+y) =\lambda (x) if y∈Zpy\in \mathbf{Z}_p. It then follows that x↦x\mapsto exp(2iπλ(x)i\pi \lambda (x)) is a unitary character of Qp\mathbf{Q}_p. Since λ(x)∈Z\lambda (x)\in \mathbf{Z} if and only if x∈Zpx\in \mathbf{Z}_p, the kernel of this character is Zp\mathbf{Z}_p.

We recall that the normalised Haar measure on the additive group of Qp\mathbf{Q}_p is the unique Haar measure μ\mu such that μ(Zp)=1\mu(\mathbf{Z}_p) = 1 (INT, VII, §1, No.o6^o6, example).

Corollary 02K0

a) The group Qp\mathbf{Q}_p is in duality with itself with respect to the mapping (x,y)↦(x, y)\mapsto exp(2iπλ(xy)i\pi \lambda (xy)). The normalised Haar measure on Qp\mathbf{Q}_p is then its own dual ;

b) The groups Zp\mathbf{Z}_p and Qp/Zp\mathbf{Q}_p/\mathbf{Z}_p are in duality relative to the mapping obtained by passing to the quotient from the mapping defined by (z,x)↦(z, x)\mapsto exp(2iπλ(zx)i\pi \lambda (zx)), and the dual measure of the normalized Haar measure on Zp\mathbf{Z}_p is the counting measure on Qp/Zp\mathbf{Q}_p/\mathbf{Z}_p.

The proof follows step by step that of Cor. 2 of Prop. 19.

9. Euclidean Fourier Transform and Fourier Series

∗* Let n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}. We identify Rn\mathbf{R}^n with its dual as in Cor. 3 of II, p. 236. The dual measure of the Lebesgue measure is then the Lebesgue measure. We endow Rn\mathbf{R}^n with the euclidean norm. For every multi-index α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n, and every x=(x1,...,xn)∈Rnx= (x_1, . . . , x_n)\in \mathbf{R}^n, we write xα=x1α1⋯xnαnx^{\alpha}=x^{\alpha_1}_1\cdots x^{\alpha_n}_n, and we denote by XαX^{\alpha} the function x↦xαx\mapsto x^{\alpha} on Rn\mathbf{R}^n.

Let m∈Rmm\in \mathbf{R}^m. Every continuous morphism of commutative groups from Rm\mathbf{R}^m into Rn\mathbf{R}^n is a linear mapping σ∈L(Rn,Rm)\sigma \in \mathscr{L}(\mathbf{R}^n,\mathbf{R}^m) (TG, VII, p. 11, Prop. 1). The dual morphism σ^\widehat{\sigma} is identified with the linear mapping tσ^t\sigma.

The Fourier transform on Rn\mathbf{R}^n takes a particularly convenient form in the setting of the space of Schwartz functions and of its dual (IV, to appear). We summarize here its principal results.

Let S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) be the space of indefinitely differentiable complex-valued functions φ\varphi on Rn\mathbf{R}^n such that, for every multi-index α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n and every integer k∈Nk\in \mathbf{N}, the function

x↦∥x∥k∂αφ(x) x\mapsto \|x\|^k\partial^{\alpha}\varphi (x)

is bounded on Rn\mathbf{R}^n. We endow S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) with the locally convex topology defined by the seminorms

pk,α:φ↦p_{k,\alpha}:\varphi \mapsto supx∈Rn∥x∥k∣∂αφ(x)∣_{x\in\mathbf{R}^n}\|x\|^k|\partial^{\alpha}\varphi (x)|.

One says that S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) is the space of Schwartz functions on Rn\mathbf{R}^n.

For every α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n, the mappings φ↦∂αφ\varphi \mapsto \partial^{\alpha}\varphi and φ↦Xαφ\varphi \mapsto X^{\alpha}\varphi are continuous from S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) into itself. The space S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) is a topological algebra; it is a Fréchet space and a Montel space (TVS IV, p. 18, Def. 4). For every p∈[1,+∞]p\in [1,+\infty ], the space S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) is contained in Lp(Rn)\mathscr{L}^p(\mathbf{R}^n) and the canonical injection of S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) into Lp(Rn)\mathscr{L}^p(\mathbf{R}^n) is continuous. The image of S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) in Lp(Rn)L^p(\mathbf{R}^n) is dense if p≠+∞p\not= +\infty.

Since every Schwartz function φ\varphi is integrable on Rn\mathbf{R}^n, it admits a Fourier transform denoted by φ^\widehat{\varphi} which is identified with the continuous function on Rn\mathbf{R}^n defined by

y↦∫Rnφ(x)y\mapsto \int_{\mathbf{R}^n}\varphi (x) exp(−2iπx⋅y-2i\pi x\cdot y)dxdx.

The Fourier cotransform of φ\varphi is, for its part, identified with the continuous function defined by

y↦∫Rnφ(x)y\mapsto \int_{\mathbf{R}^n}\varphi (x) exp(2iπx⋅yi\pi x\cdot y)dxdx.

Let φ∈S(Rn)\varphi \in \mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n). Let α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n be a multi-index. One has

F(∂αφ)=(2iπ)∣α∣XαF(φ) \mathscr{F}(\partial^{\alpha}\varphi ) = (2i\pi )^{|\alpha|}X^{\alpha}\mathscr{F}(\varphi )
F(Xαφ)=(−2iπ)−∣α∣∂α(F(φ)) \mathscr{F}(X^{\alpha}\varphi ) = (-2i\pi )^{-|\alpha|}\partial^{\alpha}(\mathscr{F}(\varphi ))

Proposition 21 02K1

The restriction of the Fourier transform to S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) is an automorphism of topological vector spaces whose inverse is the restriction of the Fourier cotransform.

Let Λ⊂Rn\Lambda \subset \mathbf{R}^n be a lattice (TG, VII, p. 4), and let Λ∗⊂Rn\Lambda^*\subset \mathbf{R}^n be the associated lattice (TG, VII, p. 6), also sometimes called the dual lattice.

The covolume of the lattice Λ is, by definition, the measure of Rn/Λ\mathbf{R}^n/\Lambda for the Haar measure induced by Lebesgue measure on Rn(\mathbf{R}^n(cf. INT, VIII, §5, no5^o5, example), and is denoted by V(Λ). For every function f∈f\in S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) and every y∈Rny\in \mathbf{R}^n, one has the Poisson formula

1

∑f(x+y)=∑f^(z)\sum f(x+y) =\sum\widehat{f}(z) exp(2iπy⋅zi\pi y\cdot z).

V(Λ) \*

x∈Λz∈Λx\in \Lambda z\in \Lambda

Remark 1 02K2

More generally, by the corollary to proposition 15 of II, p. 230, this formula is valid for every integrable complex function on Rn\mathbf{R}^n such that

∑x∈Λ∣f(x+y)∣<+∞ \sum_{x\in\Lambda}|f(x+y)|<+\infty

for every y∈Rny\in \mathbf{R}^n and such that the function on Tn\mathbf{T}^n defined by

y↦∑x∈Λf(x+y) y\mapsto \sum_{x\in\Lambda}f(x+y)

is continuous and admits an absolutely convergent Fourier series (cf. below).

Remark 2 02K3

There exist functions f∈B(R)f\in B(\mathbf{R}) such that the series ∑n∈Zf(n)\sum_{n\in\mathbf{Z}}f(n) diverges (exercise 4 of II, p. 263).

Example 02K4

Let Q be a positive definite quadratic form on Rn\mathbf{R}^n. The function defined by φ(x)=\varphi (x) = exp(−πQ(x)-\pi Q(x)) belong to S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n). There exists σ∈\sigma \in GL(n,Rn,\mathbf{R}) such that Q(x)=∥σ(x)∥2Q(x) =\|\sigma (x)\|^2 for every x∈Rnx\in \mathbf{R}^n. The Fourier transform of φ\varphi is given for every y∈Rny\in \mathbf{R}^n by

φ^(y)=∣\widehat{\varphi}(y) =|det(1σ1\sigma )∣| exp(−πQ∗(y)-\pi Q^*(y))

where Q∗(y)=∥tσ−1(y)∥2(Q^*(y) =\|^t\sigma^{-1}(y)\|^2(cf. INT, IX, §6, no^o 4–5 and exercise 1, c) of II, p. 262).

Definition 6 02K5

The space of tempered distributions on Rn\mathbf{R}^n is, by definition, the dual space of S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) endowed with the topology of bounded convergence. It is denoted by S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n).

Since S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) is bornological, the space S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) is complete and bornological (EVT, III, p. 24, cor. 1 and 2). Since S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) is a Montel space, the same is true of S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) (EVT, IV, p. 19, prop. 9).

Let α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n. The transpose of the endomorphism φ↦Xαφ\varphi \mapsto X^{\alpha}\varphi of S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) is again denoted by f↦Xαff\mapsto X^{\alpha}f, and f↦∂αff\mapsto \partial^{\alpha}f denotes the endomorphism of S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) defined by

⟨∂αf,φ⟩=(−1)∣α∣⟨f,∂αφ⟩ \langle \partial^{\alpha}f, \varphi \rangle = (-1)^{|\alpha|}\langle f, \partial^{\alpha}\varphi \rangle

for f∈S′(Rn)f\in \mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) and φ∈S(Rn)\varphi \in \mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n).

Let ff be a linear mapping of S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) into C\mathbf{C}. Then ff is a tempered distribution if, and only if, for every family (Mk,α)(k,α)∈N×Nn(M_{k,\alpha})_{(k,\alpha)\in\mathbf{N}\times\mathbf{N}^n} in R+\mathbf{R}_+, the linear form ff is bounded on the set of functions φ∈S(Rn)\varphi \in \mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) such that for every (k,α)∈N×Nn(k, \alpha )\in \mathbf{N}\times \mathbf{N}^n, one has pk,α(φ)⩽Mk,αp_{k,\alpha}(\varphi )\leqslant M_{k,\alpha}.

A sequence (fm)m∈N(f_m)_{m\in\mathbf{N}} of tempered distributions converges to a tempered distribution ff if, and only if, one has ⟨fm,φ⟩→⟨f,φ⟩\langle f_m, \varphi \rangle \rightarrow \langle f, \varphi \rangle for every φ∈S(Rn)\varphi \in \mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n).

Example 02K6

A measure ν\nu on Rn\mathbf{R}^n is said to be tempered if there exists a positive integer rr such that the continuous mapping x↦(1+∥x∥)−rx\mapsto (1+\|x\|)^{-r} is ν\nu-integrable on Rn\mathbf{R}^n. The restriction of ν\nu to S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) is a tempered distribution. It is zero if and only if the measure ν\nu is zero.

Let p∈[1,+∞]p\in [1,+\infty ] and f∈Lp(Rn)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(\mathbf{R}^n). Then the measure f⋅dxf\cdot dx with density ff with respect to Lebesgue measure is tempered. In particular, Lebesgue measure μ\mu on Rn\mathbf{R}^n is tempered, and every bounded measure on Rn\mathbf{R}^n is tempered.

For every p∈[1,+∞]p\in [1,+\infty ], one can identify Lp(Rn)L^p(\mathbf{R}^n) with a subspace of S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) by the linear mapping f↦f⋅dxf\mapsto f\cdot dx; this mapping is continuous.

Definition 7 02K7

The transpose of the Fourier transform on S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) (resp. of the inverse Fourier transform) is called the Fourier transform on S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n), and is denoted by F\mathscr{F} (resp. is called the inverse Fourier transform, and is denoted by F‾\overline{\mathscr{F}}).

For f∈S′(Rn)f\in \mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n), the tempered distribution F(f)\mathscr{F}(f) (resp. F‾(f)\overline{\mathscr{F}}(f)) is defined by φ↦⟨f,F(φ)⟩\varphi \mapsto \langle f,\mathscr{F}(\varphi )\rangle for φ∈S(Rn)\varphi \in \mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) (resp. by φ↦\varphi \mapsto ⟨f,F‾(φ)⟩\langle f,\overline{\mathscr{F}}(\varphi )\rangle ).

The Fourier transform on S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) is an automorphism of topological vector spaces whose inverse is the inverse Fourier transform F‾\overline{\mathscr{F}}.

Proposition 22 02K8

Let ff be a tempered distribution belonging to M1(Rn)\mathscr{M}^1(\mathbf{R}^n) (resp. to L2(Rn)L^2(\mathbf{R}^n)). The Fourier transform of ff in S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) is the tempered distribution associated with the Fourier transform of ff in C0(Rn)\mathscr{C}_0(\mathbf{R}^n) (resp. in L2(Rn)L^2(\mathbf{R}^n)). Analogously for the inverse Fourier transform.

Remark 02K9

The elementary formulas concerning the Fourier transform of measures remain valid for the Fourier transform of tempered distributions.

Thus, if α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n and f∈S′(Rn)f\in \mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n), one has

F(∂αf)=(2iπ)∣α∣XαF(f) \mathscr{F}(\partial^{\alpha}f) = (2i\pi )^{|\alpha|}X^{\alpha}\mathscr{F}(f)
F(Xαf)=(−2iπ)−∣α∣∂α(F(f)) \mathscr{F}(X^{\alpha}f) = (-2i\pi )^{-|\alpha|}\partial^{\alpha}(\mathscr{F}(f))

Let y∈Rny\in \mathbf{R}^n. Let us denote by γ(y)\boldsymbol{\gamma }(y) the endomorphism of S′(Rn)\mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) defined by

⟨γ(y)f,φ⟩=⟨f,γ(−y)φ⟩ \langle \boldsymbol{\gamma }(y)f, \varphi \rangle =\langle f,\boldsymbol{\gamma }(-y)\varphi \rangle

for f∈S′(Rn)f\in \mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n) and φ∈S(Rn)\varphi \in \mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n). Let eye_y be the character of Rn\mathbf{R}^n such that ey(x)=e_y(x) = exp(2iπx⋅yi\pi x\cdot y). Then ey∈S′(Rn)e_y\in \mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n). We have F(ey)=εy\mathscr{F}(e_y) =\varepsilon_y, and more generally

F(eyf)=γ(y)F(f) \mathscr{F}(e_yf) =\boldsymbol{\gamma }(y)\mathscr{F}(f)

for every f∈S′(Rn).∗f\in \mathscr{S}'(\mathbf{R}^n).*

Let n⩾1n\geqslant 1 be an integer, and let G=TnG =\mathbf{T}^n, endowed with the normalized Haar measure. The dual group of G is identified with Zn\mathbf{Z}^n by the mapping h↦χhh\mapsto \chi_h, where χh\chi_h is the unitary character of Tn\mathbf{T}^n obtained by passing to the quotient from the character x↦x\mapsto exp(2iπh⋅xi\pi h\cdot x) of Rn\mathbf{R}^n (Corollary 3 of II, p. 236). The Fourier transform of a measure μ\mu on Tn\mathbf{T}^n is identified with the family (μ^(h))h∈Zn(\widehat{\mu}(h))_{h\in\mathbf{Z}^n} where

μ^(h)=∫Tne−2iπh⋅xdμ(x) \widehat{\mu}(h) =\int_{\mathbf{T}^n}e^{-2i\pi h\cdot x}d\mu(x)

The series

∑h∈Znμ^(h)χh \sum_{h\in\mathbf{Z}^n}\widehat{\mu}(h)\chi_h

is called the Fourier series of μ\mu.

If f∈L1(Tn)f\in L^1(\mathbf{T}^n) is such that its Fourier series converges absolutely in L1(Zn)L^1(\mathbf{Z}^n), then f∈C(Tn)f\in \mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n) and

f(x)=∑h∈Znf^(h)e2iπh⋅x f(x) =\sum_{h\in\mathbf{Z}^n}\widehat{f}(h)e^{2i\pi h\cdot x}

for every x∈Tnx\in \mathbf{T}^n (Theorem 3 of II, p. 222), where

f^(h)=∫Tnf(x)e−2iπh⋅xdx,h∈Zn \widehat{f}(h) =\int_{\mathbf{T}^n}f(x)e^{-2i\pi h\cdot x}dx,h\in \mathbf{Z}^n

For f∈L2(Tn)f\in L^2(\mathbf{T}^n), the fourier inversion formula (Proposition 12 of II, p. 219) says that, if the series with general term f^(h)\widehat{f}(h) converges absolutely, one has

f(x)=∑h∈Znf^(h)e2iπh⋅x f(x) =\sum_{h\in\mathbf{Z}^n}\widehat{f}(h)e^{2i\pi h\cdot x}

for almost every xx in Tn\mathbf{T}^n.

However, even if ff is continuous, the Fourier series of ff does not generally converge to f(x)f(x) for every xx (Exercise 30 of II, p. 274). The following result is all the more useful.

Proposition 23 (Fejér's theorem) 02KA

Let n⩾1n\geqslant 1 be an integer. For every h=(hi)∈Znh= (h_i)\in \mathbf{Z}^n, put ∣h∣=|h|= supi∣hi∣_i|h_i|. Let f∈C(Tn)f\in \mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n). For every integer N⩾1N\geqslant 1, let us denote by fNf_N the function on Tn\mathbf{T}^n such that

fN(x)=∑h∈Zn∣h∣⩽Nf^(h)e2iπh⋅x∏j=1n(1−∣hj∣N) f_N(x) =\sum_{\substack{h\in\mathbf{Z}^n\\|h|\leqslant N}}\widehat{f}(h)e^{2i\pi h\cdot x}\prod_{j=1}^n\left(1-\frac{|h_j|}{N}\right)

for x∈Tnx\in \mathbf{T}^n. Then fNf_N converges to ff in C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n).

Lemma 11 02KB

For every N⩾1N\geqslant 1, let μN\mu_N be the measure on Tn\mathbf{T}^n with density the continuous mapping

FN:x↦∑h∈Zn∣h∣⩽Ne2iπh⋅x∏j=1n(1−∣hj∣N). F_N:x\mapsto \sum_{\substack{h\in\mathbf{Z}^n\\|h|\leqslant N}}e^{2i\pi h\cdot x}\prod_{j=1}^n\left(1-\frac{|h_j|}{N}\right).

The sequence of measures (μN)N⩾1(\mu_N)_{N\geqslant 1} converges to ε0\varepsilon_0 in the space M1(Tn)\mathscr{M}^1(\mathbf{T}^n) endowed with the topology of compact convergence in C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n).

We are reduced to the case n=1n= 1 by observing that μN\mu_N is the product of measures of the same type for n=1n= 1. It is then enough to verify that the sequence (μN)(\mu_N) satisfies the hypotheses of lemma 4 of INT, VIII, §2, No.o7^o7 with a=0a= 0.

For this, let us first observe that FNF_N is the Fourier cotransform of the mapping φN:h↦(1−∣h∣/N)\varphi_N:h\mapsto (1- |h|/N) on Z\mathbf{Z}. This may be written φN=\varphi_N= N−1ψN∗ψ~NN^{-1}\psi_N*\widetilde{\psi}_N, where ψN\psi_N is the characteristic function of the set defined by −N/2<∣h∣⩽N/2-N/2<|h|\leqslant N/2. Consequently, FN=N−1∣F(ψN)∣2⩾0F_N= N^{-1}|\mathscr{F}(\psi_N)|^2\geqslant 0. Thus, μN\mu_N is a positive measure; we have μN(T)=1\mu_N(\mathbf{T}) = 1, which proves (i) and (iii) in loc. cit.

Let us prove condition (ii) of loc. cit. Let U be an open neighbourhood of 0 in T\mathbf{T}. It is enough to prove that μN(U)→1\mu_N(U)\rightarrow 1 when N→+∞N\rightarrow +\infty. Let K be a symmetric compact neighbourhood of 0 such that K2⊂UK^2\subset U and let ψ\psi be the characteristic function of K. Put φ=ψ∗ψ\varphi =\psi *\psi. It is an element of A(T)A(\mathbf{T}) with support contained in U. The real number m=φ(0)m=\varphi (0) is the measure of the set K and hence m>0m >0. Moreover, we have 0⩽φ⩽m0\leqslant \varphi \leqslant m since φ(x)\varphi (x) is the measure of the set K∩xKK\cap xK. We have

μN(U)⩾1m∫Tφ(x)μN(x)=1m∑F(φ)(h)φN(h) \mu_N(U)\geqslant \frac{1}{m}\int_{\mathbf{T}}\varphi (x)\mu_N(x) =\frac{1}{m}\sum\mathscr{F}(\varphi )(h)\varphi_N(h)
h∈Zh\in \mathbf{Z}

by the transposition properties of the Fourier transform (prop. 13 of II, p. 221). Since φ∈A(T)\varphi \in A(\mathbf{T}), its Fourier transform belongs to L1(Z)L^1(\mathbf{Z}) and φ\varphi satisfies the fourier inversion formula (prop. 11 of II, p. 217). Since φN(h)→1\varphi_N(h)\rightarrow 1 for every h∈Zh\in \mathbf{Z} and ∣φN(h)∣⩽1|\varphi_N(h)|\leqslant 1, the Lebesgue theorem (INT, IV, §3, no7^o7, th. 6) and the fourier inversion formula imply that

lim infN→+∞μN(U)⩾1m_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\mu_N(U)\geqslant \frac{1}{m} limN→+∞∑h∈ZF(φ)(h)φN(h)=_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\sum_{h\in\mathbf{Z}}\mathscr{F}(\varphi )(h)\varphi_N(h) =

1 ∑F(φ)(h)=1φ(0)=1\sum\mathscr{F}(\varphi )(h) =1\varphi (0) = 1.

mh∈Zm m_{h\in\mathbf{Z}}m

Let us prove the proposition. We have f∗FN=fNf*F_N=f_N for N⩾1N\geqslant 1. The regular representation γ\boldsymbol{\gamma } of Tn\mathbf{T}^n in C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n) (INT, VIII, §2, No.o3^o3) is continuous and satisfies f∗FN=γ(μN)ff*F_N=\boldsymbol{\gamma }(\mu_N)f (INT, VIII, §4, No.o5^o5, prop. 5 (iv)). The mapping μ↦γ(μ)f\mu\mapsto \boldsymbol{\gamma }(\mu)f is continuous from M1(Tn)\mathscr{M}^1(\mathbf{T}^n) into C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n) (INT, VI, §1, No.o6^o6, prop. 14). By the lemma, we therefore have

limN→+∞fN=_{N\rightarrow+\infty}f_N= limN→+∞f∗FN=_{N\rightarrow+\infty}f*F_N= limN→+∞γ(μN)f=γ(ε0)(f)=f_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\boldsymbol{\gamma }(\mu_N)f=\boldsymbol{\gamma }(\varepsilon_0)(f) =f

in C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n).

Remark 02KC

There exist functions f∈L1(T)f\in L^1(\mathbf{T}) whose Fourier series diverges at every point x∈Tx\in \mathbf{T} (Kolmogorov's theorem, cf. exercise 51 of II, p. 289).

A theorem of Carleson[^1] shows that the symmetric partial sums of the Fourier series of ff converge to f(x)f(x) for almost all x∈Tx\in \mathbf{T} if f∈L2(T)f\in \mathscr{L}^2(\mathbf{T}).

Exercises

See the exercises for § 1.

[^1]: L. Carleson, On convergence and growth of partial sums of Fourier series, Acta Mathematica 116 (1), 1966, p. 135–157.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.