Bourbaki

Lemma 8

Tag 02J6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02J6].

Théories spectrales, chapter II, § 1. Transformation de Fourier

Let g:G→Kg: G\rightarrow K be a morphism of commutative locally compact topological groups. If the morphism gg is surjective and strict, then g^\widehat{g} is injective and strict.

Since gg is surjective, the morphism g^\widehat{g} is injective (lemma 2 of II, p. 205). To prove that g^\widehat{g} is a strict morphism, it is enough to prove that for every neighbourhood U of ee in K^\widehat{K}, there exists a neighbourhood V of ee in G^\widehat{G} such that g^−1(V)⊂U\overset{-1}{\widehat{g}}(V)\subset U (lemma 2 of II, p. 200). Let U be such a neighbourhood of ee in K^\widehat{K}. By definition of the topology of K^\widehat{K}, there exist a compact subset X of K and a number ε>0\varepsilon >0 such that U contains the set of z^∈K^\widehat{z}\in \widehat{K} which, for every z∈Xz\in X, satisfy ∣⟨z^,z⟩−1∣<ε|\langle \widehat{z}, z\rangle -1|< \varepsilon. Since gg is strict and surjective, there exists, by TG, I, p. 80, prop. 10, a compact subset X0X_0 of G such that g(X0)=Xg(X_0) = X. Let V be the neighbourhood of ee in G^\widehat{G} formed by the elements χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G} such that,

for every x∈X0x\in X_0, one has ∣⟨χ,x⟩−1∣<ε|\langle \chi , x\rangle -1|< \varepsilon. One then has g^−1(V)⊂U\overset{-1}{\widehat{g}}(V)\subset U. This proves the assertion.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.