Bourbaki

Definition 5

Tag 02J2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02J2].

Théories spectrales, chapter II, § 1. Transformation de Fourier

Let G, H and K be topological groups. Let f:H→Gf: H\rightarrow G and g:G→Kg: G\rightarrow K be morphisms of topological groups. The pair (f,g)(f, g) is said to be an exact sequence of topological groups if it is an exact sequence of groups (A, II, p. 10, Remark 5) and if ff and gg are strict morphisms.

An exact sequence will be represented by the diagram

H⟶fG⟶gK H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K

and one will say that a diagram

G1⟶f1G2⟶f2G3→⋯→Gn⟶fnGn+1 G_1\longrightarrow^{f_1}G_2\longrightarrow^{f_2}G_3\rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow G_n\longrightarrow^{f_n}G_{n+1}

is exact if each pair (fi,fi+1)(f_i, f_{i+1}) for 1⩽i⩽n−11\leqslant i\leqslant n-1 is exact.

A sequence

1→H⟶fG⟶gK→1 1\rightarrow H\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}G\overset{g}{\longrightarrow}K\rightarrow 1

is exact if and only if ff is a strict injective morphism, gg is a strict surjective morphism, and the kernel of gg is equal to the image of ff. If K is separated, the image of ff is a closed subgroup of G.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.