The canonical mapping of G into X(L1(G)) is a homeomorphism.
Let us denote this canonical mapping by ev and, for χ∈G, let us denote by evχ the image of the character χ under ev, that is to say, the hermitian character f↦χ(f) of L1(G). Considered as a mapping of G into the dual of L1(G), the mapping ev is the composite of the injection of G into L∞(G), endowed with the weak topology σ(L∞(G),L1(G)), and the injection of L∞(G) into the dual of L1(G), endowed with the topology of simple convergence. Since G is a bounded subset of L∞(G), the first mapping is continuous by the Lebesgue theorem (INT, IV, §3, Noo7, Th. 6). The second is likewise continuous, by definition. This proves that the mapping ev is continuous.
If χ∈G and if f∈L1(G), we have evχ(εx∗f)=χ(x)evχ(f). Taking f such that evχ(f)=0, we deduce that the mapping ev is injective.
Let ζ∈X(L1(G)) and let f∈L1(G) be such that ζ(f)=0. Define a mapping χ:G→C by putting, for x∈G:
χ(x)=ζ(f)ζ(εx∗f)(3)
We have χ(e)=1. Since the mapping x↦εx∗f=γ(x)(f) of G into L1(G) is continuous (INT, VIII, §2, no5, Proposition 8), the mapping χ is continuous. It is bounded because, for every x∈G, we have
∣χ(x)∣⩽∣ζ(f)∣∥εx∗f∥=∣ζ(f)∣∥f∥
(Theorem 1 of I, p. 29 and INT, VIII, loc. cit.).
Now let B be a basis of the filter of neighbourhoods of e consisting of compact neighbourhoods. For every V∈B, let gV be a positive continuous function, zero outside V and of integral equal to 1 (Lemma 1 of II, p. 200). For every function h∈L1(G), one then has
εx∗h= limV,B(εx∗h)∗gV= limV,B(εx∗gV∗h),
in L1(G), the limit being taken with respect to the filter of sections of B (INT, VIII, §4, no7, Proposition 20). In particular, since ζ(εx∗gV∗f)=ζ(εx∗gV)ζ(f), it follows that
which proves that χ is a homomorphism of G into C∗. Since χ is bounded and continuous, it is a unitary character of G. Moreover, if g∈L1(G), we have
g∗f=∫G(εx∗f)g(x)dx
in L1(G) (INT, VIII, §1, no5, Proposition 7), whence
ζ(g)ζ(f)=ζ(g∗f)=∫Gζ(εx∗f)g(x)dx
=ζ(f)∫Gχ(x)g(x)dx= evχ(g)ζ(f) (INT, VI, §1, no1, Proposition 1), which shows that ζ= evχ. Consequently, ev is surjective, hence bijective.
Finally, let us show that the reciprocal mapping ev−1 is continuous. Let ζ∈X(L1(G)). Let f∈L1(G) be a function such that ζ(f)=0. The set W of ξ∈X(L1(G)) such that ξ(f)=0 is an open neighbourhood of ζ in X(L1(G)). For every ξ∈W, what precedes shows that ev−1(ξ) is the character
x↦ξ(f)ξ(εx∗f)
Let F be a filter on W⊂X(L1(G)) converging to ζ. Since the set X(L1(G)) is bounded, hence equicontinuous, in L∞(G), the uniform structure of simple convergence coincides with the uniform structure of compact convergence (TG, X, p. 16, Theorem 1). Let K be a compact subset of G. The set of the εx∗f for x∈K is compact in L1(G) (INT, VIII, §2, No.o5, Proposition 8). We have therefore
limξ,Fξ(εx∗f)=ζ(εx∗f)
uniformly for x∈K. It follows that
limξ,F ev−1(ξ)= ev−1(ζ),
hence ev−1 is continuous at ζ. This completes the proof of the proposition.
Henceforth we shall identify a unitary character χ of G with the character f↦∫Gf(x)χ(x)dx of L1(G).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.