Bourbaki

Lemma 11

Tag 02KB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02KB].

Théories spectrales, chapter II, § 1. Transformation de Fourier

For every N⩾1N\geqslant 1, let μN\mu_N be the measure on Tn\mathbf{T}^n with density the continuous mapping

FN:x↦∑h∈Zn∣h∣⩽Ne2iπh⋅x∏j=1n(1−∣hj∣N). F_N:x\mapsto \sum_{\substack{h\in\mathbf{Z}^n\\|h|\leqslant N}}e^{2i\pi h\cdot x}\prod_{j=1}^n\left(1-\frac{|h_j|}{N}\right).

The sequence of measures (μN)N⩾1(\mu_N)_{N\geqslant 1} converges to ε0\varepsilon_0 in the space M1(Tn)\mathscr{M}^1(\mathbf{T}^n) endowed with the topology of compact convergence in C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n).

We are reduced to the case n=1n= 1 by observing that μN\mu_N is the product of measures of the same type for n=1n= 1. It is then enough to verify that the sequence (μN)(\mu_N) satisfies the hypotheses of lemma 4 of INT, VIII, §2, No.o7^o7 with a=0a= 0.

For this, let us first observe that FNF_N is the Fourier cotransform of the mapping φN:h↦(1−∣h∣/N)\varphi_N:h\mapsto (1- |h|/N) on Z\mathbf{Z}. This may be written φN=\varphi_N= N−1ψN∗ψ~NN^{-1}\psi_N*\widetilde{\psi}_N, where ψN\psi_N is the characteristic function of the set defined by −N/2<∣h∣⩽N/2-N/2<|h|\leqslant N/2. Consequently, FN=N−1∣F(ψN)∣2⩾0F_N= N^{-1}|\mathscr{F}(\psi_N)|^2\geqslant 0. Thus, μN\mu_N is a positive measure; we have μN(T)=1\mu_N(\mathbf{T}) = 1, which proves (i) and (iii) in loc. cit.

Let us prove condition (ii) of loc. cit. Let U be an open neighbourhood of 0 in T\mathbf{T}. It is enough to prove that μN(U)→1\mu_N(U)\rightarrow 1 when N→+∞N\rightarrow +\infty. Let K be a symmetric compact neighbourhood of 0 such that K2⊂UK^2\subset U and let ψ\psi be the characteristic function of K. Put φ=ψ∗ψ\varphi =\psi *\psi. It is an element of A(T)A(\mathbf{T}) with support contained in U. The real number m=φ(0)m=\varphi (0) is the measure of the set K and hence m>0m >0. Moreover, we have 0⩽φ⩽m0\leqslant \varphi \leqslant m since φ(x)\varphi (x) is the measure of the set K∩xKK\cap xK. We have

μN(U)⩾1m∫Tφ(x)μN(x)=1m∑F(φ)(h)φN(h) \mu_N(U)\geqslant \frac{1}{m}\int_{\mathbf{T}}\varphi (x)\mu_N(x) =\frac{1}{m}\sum\mathscr{F}(\varphi )(h)\varphi_N(h)
h∈Zh\in \mathbf{Z}

by the transposition properties of the Fourier transform (prop. 13 of II, p. 221). Since φ∈A(T)\varphi \in A(\mathbf{T}), its Fourier transform belongs to L1(Z)L^1(\mathbf{Z}) and φ\varphi satisfies the fourier inversion formula (prop. 11 of II, p. 217). Since φN(h)→1\varphi_N(h)\rightarrow 1 for every h∈Zh\in \mathbf{Z} and ∣φN(h)∣⩽1|\varphi_N(h)|\leqslant 1, the Lebesgue theorem (INT, IV, §3, no7^o7, th. 6) and the fourier inversion formula imply that

lim infN→+∞μN(U)⩾1m_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\mu_N(U)\geqslant \frac{1}{m} limN→+∞∑h∈ZF(φ)(h)φN(h)=_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\sum_{h\in\mathbf{Z}}\mathscr{F}(\varphi )(h)\varphi_N(h) =

1 ∑F(φ)(h)=1φ(0)=1\sum\mathscr{F}(\varphi )(h) =1\varphi (0) = 1.

mh∈Zm m_{h\in\mathbf{Z}}m

Let us prove the proposition. We have f∗FN=fNf*F_N=f_N for N⩾1N\geqslant 1. The regular representation γ\boldsymbol{\gamma } of Tn\mathbf{T}^n in C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n) (INT, VIII, §2, No.o3^o3) is continuous and satisfies f∗FN=γ(μN)ff*F_N=\boldsymbol{\gamma }(\mu_N)f (INT, VIII, §4, No.o5^o5, prop. 5 (iv)). The mapping μ↦γ(μ)f\mu\mapsto \boldsymbol{\gamma }(\mu)f is continuous from M1(Tn)\mathscr{M}^1(\mathbf{T}^n) into C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n) (INT, VI, §1, No.o6^o6, prop. 14). By the lemma, we therefore have

limN→+∞fN=_{N\rightarrow+\infty}f_N= limN→+∞f∗FN=_{N\rightarrow+\infty}f*F_N= limN→+∞γ(μN)f=γ(ε0)(f)=f_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\boldsymbol{\gamma }(\mu_N)f=\boldsymbol{\gamma }(\varepsilon_0)(f) =f

in C(Tn)\mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T}^n).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.