Bourbaki

Proposition 16

Tag 02JJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02JJ].

Théories spectrales, chapter II, § 1. Transformation de Fourier

The measure α^\widehat{\alpha} on H^=G^/H⊥\widehat{H} =\widehat{G}/H^{\bot} is equal to β/^γ^\widehat{\beta /}\widehat{\gamma}.

Let us fix a nonzero f∈K(G)f\in \mathscr{K}(G). For x∈Gx\in G and χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}, put

φ(x,χ)=∫Hf(xy)⟨χ,y⟩dα(y) \varphi (x, \chi ) =\int_Hf(xy)\langle \chi , y\rangle d\alpha (y)

The function φ\varphi is continuous on G×G^G\times \widehat{G} (INT, IV, §4, no3^o3, cor. 1 of Theorem 2). For fixed xx, φ(x,χ)\varphi (x, \chi ) depends only on the class of χ\chi in G^/H⊥=H^\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}=\widehat{H}. For fixed χ\chi, ⟨χ,x⟩φ(x,χ)\langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (x, \chi ) depends only on the class of xx in G/HG/H, and the function x˙↦⟨χ,x⟩φ(x,χ)\dot{x}\mapsto \langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (x, \chi ) on G/HG/H has compact support.

Let x∈Gx\in G. The function χ˙↦φ(x,χ)\dot{\chi}\mapsto \varphi (x, \chi ) on H^\widehat{H} is the Fourier cotransform of the function y↦f(xy)y\mapsto f(xy) on H. The latter is square-integrable, hence by the Plancherel formula (23) of II, p. 217, one has

∫G^/H⊥∣φ(x,χ)∣2dα^(χ˙)=∫H∣f(xy)∣2dα(y)(35) \int_{\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}}|\varphi (x, \chi )|^2d\widehat{\alpha}( \dot{\chi}) =\int_H|f(xy)|^2d\alpha (y) \tag{35}

Let χ∈G^\chi \in \widehat{G}. The function x˙↦⟨χ,x⟩φ(x,χ)\dot{x}\mapsto \langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (x, \chi ) belongs to K(G/H)\mathscr{K}(G/H), hence to L1(G/H)L^1(G/H). Its Fourier cotransform is the function on H⊥H^{\bot} whose value at ξ∈H⊥\xi \in H^{\bot} is

∫G/H⟨ξ,x˙⟩⟨χ,x⟩φ(x,χ)dγ(x˙)=∫G/H(∫H⟨χξ,xy⟩f(xy)dα(y))dγ(x˙) \int_{G/H}\langle \xi ,\dot{x}\rangle \langle \chi , x\rangle \varphi (x, \chi )d\gamma ( \dot{x}) =\int_{G/H}(\int_H\langle \chi \xi , xy\rangle f(xy)d\alpha (y))d\gamma ( \dot{x})
=∫G⟨χξ,x⟩f(x)dβ(x)=F‾G(f)(χξ) =\int_G\langle \chi \xi , x\rangle f(x)d\beta (x) =\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)(\chi \xi )

by formula (33). Therefore

∫G/H∣φ(x,χ)∣2dγ(x˙)=∫H⊥∣F‾G(f)(χξ)∣2dγ^(ξ)(36) \int_{G/H}|\varphi (x, \chi )|^2d\gamma ( \dot{x}) =\int_{H^{\bot}}|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)(\chi \xi )|^2d\widehat{\gamma}(\xi ) \tag{36}

by the Plancherel formula again.

One then finally computes

∫G^∣F‾G(f)∣2dβ^=∫G∣f∣2dβ\int_{\widehat{G}}|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)|^2d\widehat{\beta}=\int_G|f|^2d\beta (by (23))

=∫G/Hdγ(x˙)∫H∣f(xy)∣2dα(y)=\int_{G/H}d\gamma ( \dot{x})\int_H|f(xy)|^2d\alpha (y) (by (33))

=∫G/Hdγ(x˙)∫G^/H⊥∣φ(x,χ)∣2dα^(χ˙)=\int_{G/H}d\gamma ( \dot{x})\int_{\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}}|\varphi (x, \chi )|^2d\widehat{\alpha}( \dot{\chi}) (by (35))

=∫G^/H⊥dα^(χ˙)∫G/H∣φ(x,χ)∣2dγ(x˙) =\int_{\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}}d\widehat{\alpha}( \dot{\chi})\int_{G/H}|\varphi (x, \chi )|^2d\gamma ( \dot{x})

=∫G^/H⊥dα^(χ˙)∫H⊥∣F‾G(f)(χξ)∣2dγ^(ξ)=\int_{\widehat{G}/H^{\bot}}d\widehat{\alpha}( \dot{\chi})\int_{H^{\bot}}|\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)(\chi \xi )|^2d\widehat{\gamma}(\xi ) (by (36)),

where INT, V, §8, No.o3^o3, prop. 5 has been applied to the positive continuous function (x˙,χ˙)↦∣φ(x,χ)∣2( \dot{x},\dot{\chi})\mapsto |\varphi (x, \chi )|^2 on G/H×G^/H⊥G/H\times \widehat{G}/H^{\bot}.

Comparing this equality with the integration formula (33) for the group G^\widehat{G}, one then concludes that the Haar measures α^\widehat{\alpha} and β/^γ^\widehat{\beta /}\widehat{\gamma} coincide.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.