Bourbaki

Exercise 19, § 2

Commutative Algebra, II, 128

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let F\mathscr{F} be a set of left ideals of a ring AA; suppose that F\mathscr{F} is topologizing and idempotent (Exercises 16 and 18).

(a) Show that, if m∈Fm \in \mathscr{F}, n∈Fn \in \mathscr{F} and u∈HomA(n,As)u \in \mathrm{Hom}_A(n, A_s), then u‾1(m)∈F\overline{u}^1(m) \in \mathscr{F} (consider the exact sequence 0→n/u‾1(m)→As/u‾1(m)→As/n→00 \to n/\overline{u}^1(m) \to A_s/\overline{u}^1(m) \to A_s/n \to 0). For every AA-module MM and all v∈HomA(m,M)v \in \mathrm{Hom}_A(m, M), let u.vu.v denote the canonical image in M(F)M_{(\mathscr{F})} (Exercise 17 (c)) of the composite homomorphism u‾1(m)→um→vM\overline{u}^1(m) \xrightarrow{u} m \xrightarrow{v} M. Show that the mapping (u,v)↦u.v(u, v) \mapsto u.v is Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear; there corresponds to it a Z\mathbf{Z}-linear mapping

ψm,n:HomA(n,As)⊗ZHomA(m,M)→M(F). \psi_{m,n} : \mathrm{Hom}_A(n, A_s) \otimes_{\mathbf{Z}} \mathrm{Hom}_A(m, M) \to M_{(\mathscr{F})}.

These mappings form a direct system and their direct limit therefore corresponds canonically to a Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear mapping

ψ:A(F)×M(F)→M(F). \psi : A_{(\mathscr{F})} \times M_{(\mathscr{F})} \to M_{(\mathscr{F})}.

Show that, if M=A0M = A_0, ψ\psi is an internal law of composition which makes A(F)A_{(\mathscr{F})} into a ring and the canonical mapping A→A(F)A \to A_{(\mathscr{F})} is a ring homomorphism for this structure. For any left AA-module MM, ψ\psi is an external law defining on M(F)M_{(\mathscr{F})} a left A(F)A_{(\mathscr{F})}-module structure; with this structure (and the canonical mapping A→A(F)A \to A_{(\mathscr{F})}) the canonical mapping M→M(F)M \to M_{(\mathscr{F})} is an AA-module homomorphism.

(b) If i:M→M(F)i : M \to M_{(\mathscr{F})} is the canonical homomorphism, show that

Ker⁡(i)=FM \operatorname{Ker}(i) = \mathscr{F}M

and that the AA-module Coker⁡ (i)=M(F)/i(M)\operatorname{Coker}\,(i) = M_{(\mathscr{F})}/i(M) is 9-negligible.

(c) For every left AA-module MM let MFM_{\mathscr{F}} denote the left AA-module (M/FM)(F)(M/\mathscr{F}M)_{(\mathscr{F})} and jMj_M the composite canonical mapping

M→M/FM→MF; M \to M/\mathscr{F}M \to M_{\mathscr{F}};

then Ker⁡(jM)=FM\operatorname{Ker}(j_M) = \mathscr{F}M and the AA-module Coker⁡(jM)=MF/jM(M)\operatorname{Coker}(j_M) = M_{\mathscr{F}}/j_M(M) is F\mathscr{F}-negligible.

Let u:P→Mu : P \to M, h:P→Qh : P \to Q be AA-module homomorphisms such that Ker⁡(h)\operatorname{Ker}(h) and Coker⁡(h)\operatorname{Coker}(h) are F\mathscr{F}-negligible; show that there exists a unique AA-homomorphism v:Q→MFv : Q \to M_{\mathscr{F}} which makes the following diagram commutative

P→uM∣∣Q→vMF \begin{array}{ccc} P & \xrightarrow{u} & M \\ | & & | \\ Q & \xrightarrow{v} & M_{\mathscr{F}} \end{array}

(First reduce it to the case where hh is injective; then, identifying PP with a submodule of QQ, note that, for x∈Qx \in Q, there exists m∈Fm \in \mathscr{F} such that mx∈Pmx \in P and map xx to the canonical image in MFM_{\mathscr{F}} of the composite homomorphism

m→xmx→P→uM→M/FM. m \xrightarrow{x} mx \to P \xrightarrow{u} M \to M/\mathscr{F}M.

(d) For every AA-module homomorphism u:M→Nu : M \to N show that there exists a unique homomorphism uF:MF→NFu_{\mathscr{F}} : M_{\mathscr{F}} \to N_{\mathscr{F}} which makes the following diagram commutative

M→uN∣∣MF→uFNF \begin{array}{ccc} M & \xrightarrow{u} & N \\ | & & | \\ M_{\mathscr{F}} & \xrightarrow{u_{\mathscr{F}}} & N_{\mathscr{F}} \end{array}

(use (a), (b) and (c)). Show that, if

0⟶M→uN→vP 0 \longrightarrow M \xrightarrow{u} N \xrightarrow{v} P

is an exact sequence of A-modules, the sequence

0⟶MF→uFNF→vFPF 0 \longrightarrow M_{\mathscr{F}} \xrightarrow{u_{\mathscr{F}}} N_{\mathscr{F}} \xrightarrow{v_{\mathscr{F}}} P_{\mathscr{F}}

is exact (note that the mapping M/FM→N/FNM/\mathscr{F}M \to N/\mathscr{F}N derived from uu by taking quotients is injective).

Show that the mappings jMFj_{M_{\mathscr{F}}} and (jM)F(j_M)_{\mathscr{F}} coincide and are isomorphisms (and therefore FMF=0\mathscr{F}M_{\mathscr{F}} = 0). If N′N' is a sub-A-module of MFM_{\mathscr{F}}, (jMF−1(N′))F(j_{M_{\mathscr{F}}}^{-1}(N'))_{\mathscr{F}} is canonically identified with NF′N'_{\mathscr{F}} (observe that, if we write N=jM(N′)N = j_M(N'), N′/jM(N)N'/j_M(N) is 9-negligible).

(e) Let M be a left A-module and ϕ:A×M→M\phi : A \times M \to M the Z-bilinear mapping (a,m)↦am(a, m) \mapsto am. Show that there exists a unique Z-bilinear mapping ϕF:AF×MF→MF\phi_{\mathscr{F}} : A_{\mathscr{F}} \times M_{\mathscr{F}} \to M_{\mathscr{F}} which makes the following diagram commutative

A×M→bMjA×jM↓↓jMAF×MF→ϕFMF \begin{array}{ccc} A \times M & \xrightarrow{b} & M \\ j_A \times j_M \downarrow & & \downarrow j_M \\ A_{\mathscr{F}} \times M_{\mathscr{F}} & \xrightarrow{\phi_{\mathscr{F}}} & M_{\mathscr{F}} \end{array}

We also define on AFA_{\mathscr{F}} a ring structure and on MFM_{\mathscr{F}} a left AFA_{\mathscr{F}}-module structure. If u:M→Nu : M \to N is an A-module homomorphism, uF:MF→NFu_{\mathscr{F}} : M_{\mathscr{F}} \to N_{\mathscr{F}} is an AFA_{\mathscr{F}}-module homomorphism. In order that, for every A-module M, the mapping u↦uFu \mapsto u_{\mathscr{F}} of HomA(M,N)\mathrm{Hom}_A(M, N) to HomAF(MF,NF)\mathrm{Hom}_{A_{\mathscr{F}}}(M_{\mathscr{F}}, N_{\mathscr{F}}) be bijective, it is necessary and sufficient that jNj_N be bijective.

(f) Take A to be the polynomial ring K[X,Y]K[X, Y] over a commutative field K and F\mathscr{F} to be the (topologizing and idempotent) set of ideals of A containing a power of the ideal m=(X)+(Y)m = (X) + (Y). If M=A/AXM = A/AX and u:A→Mu : A \to M is the canonical mapping, show that uF:AF→MFu_{\mathscr{F}} : A_{\mathscr{F}} \to M_{\mathscr{F}} is not surjective. (Show that AFA_{\mathscr{F}} is identified with A and MFM_{\mathscr{F}} with K[Y‾,1/Y‾]K[\overline{Y}, 1/\overline{Y}], where Y‾\overline{Y} is the class of Y in M, so that XY‾=0X\overline{Y} = 0 and X(1/Y‾)=0X(1/\overline{Y}) = 0.)

(g) If we set F1M=MF/jM(M)\mathscr{F}^1M = M_{\mathscr{F}}/j_M(M), show that, for every exact sequence 0→M→N→P→00 \to M \to N \to P \to 0 of A-modules, there is an exact sequence

0→FM→FN→FP→F1M→F1N→F1P 0 \to \mathscr{F}M \to \mathscr{F}N \to \mathscr{F}P \to \mathscr{F}^1M \to \mathscr{F}^1N \to \mathscr{F}^1P

(use the snake diagram).

(h) Let F′\mathscr{F}' be the set of left ideals l′l' of AFA_{\mathscr{F}} such that (AF)s/l′(A_{\mathscr{F}})_s/l' is an F\mathscr{F}-negligible A-module: show that F′\mathscr{F}' is the set of left ideals of AFA_{\mathscr{F}} containing the jA(m)j_A(m), where m∈Fm \in \mathscr{F} (observe that mF=AFm_{\mathscr{F}} = A_{\mathscr{F}} for all m∈Fm \in \mathscr{F}, using the exact sequence of (d); consequently AF/jA(m)A_{\mathscr{F}}/j_A(m) is 9-negligible). For every AFA_{\mathscr{F}}-module M′M', FM′=F′M′\mathscr{F}M' = \mathscr{F}'M' (M′M' being considered as an AA-module by means of jAj_A), F′\mathscr{F}' is topologizing and idempotent and MF′′M'_{\mathscr{F}'} is canonically identified with MF′M'_{\mathscr{F}}.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.