1. Prime ideals associated with a module
1. Definition of associated prime ideals
Definition 1
Let M be a module over a ring A. A prime ideal p is said to be associated with M if there exists x ∈ M such that p is equal to the annihilator & x. The set of prime ideals associated with M is denoted by Ass_A(M), or simply Ass(M).
\* Example. Let a be an ideal in the polynomial ring A = \mathbf{C}[X_1, ..., X_n], V the corresponding affine algebraic variety and V_1, ..., V_p the irreducible components of V. If M is taken to be the ring A/a of functions which are regular on V, the set of prime ideals associated with M consists of the ideals of V_1, ..., V_p and in general other prime ideals each of which contains one of the ideals of the V_i. \*
As the annihilator of 0 is A, an element x ∈ M whose annihilator is a prime ideal is necessarily ≠ 0. To say that a prime idea p is associated with M
(*) The results of this chapter depend only on Books I to VI and Chapters I to III of this Book, excluding Chapter I, § 4 and Chapter III, § 5.
amounts to saying that contains a submodule isomorphic to (namely , for all whose annihilator is ).
If an -module is the union of a family of submodules, then clearly
Proposition 1
For every prime ideal of a ring and every submodule of , .
As the ring is an integral domain, the annihilator of an element of is .
Proposition 2
Let be a module over a ring . Every maximal element of the set of ideals of , where runs through the set of elements of , belongs to .
Let () be such a maximal element; it is sufficient to show that is prime. As , . Let be elements of such that and . Then , and . As is maximal, , whence , so that is prime.
Corollary 1
Let be a module over a Noetherian ring . Then the condition is equivalent to .
If , clearly is empty (without any hypothesis on ). If , the set of ideals of the form , where and , is non-empty and consists of ideals ; as is Noetherian, this set has a maximal element; then it suffices to apply Proposition 2.
Corollary 2
Let be a Noetherian ring, an -module and an element of . For the homothety on with ratio to be injective, it is necessary and sufficient that belong to no prime ideal associated with .
If belongs to a prime ideal , then , where ; whence and the homothety with ratio is not injective. Conversely, if for some such that , then , whence (Corollary 1). Let ; then obviously and , where ; whence , since .
Corollary 3
The set of divisors of zero in a Noetherian ring is the union of the ideals .
Proposition 3
Let be a ring, an -module and a submodule of . Then*
Corollary 1
If an A-module is the direct sum of a family of submodules, then* .
It may be reduced to the case where is finite by means of (1), then to the case where by induction on . Then let , where ; as is isomorphic to , (Proposition 3); moreover, and are contained in (Proposition 3), whence the result.
Corollary 2
Let be an A-module and a finite family of submodules of . If* , then
Proposition 4
Let be an A-module and a subset of . Then there exists a submodule of such that* and .
Let be the set of submodules of such that . Formula (1) shows that the set , ordered by inclusion, is inductive; moreover, and hence . Let be a maximal element of . Then . We shall see that , which, by Proposition 3, will complete the proof. Let ; then contains a submodule isomorphic to . By Propositions 1 and 3, . Since is maximal in , and hence .
2. Localization of associated prime ideals
Proposition 5
Let be a ring, a multiplicative subset of , the set of prime ideals of which do not meet and an A-module. Then*: (i) The mapping is a bijection of onto a subset of . (ii) If is a finitely generated ideal and , then .
Recall (Chapter II, § 2, no. 5, Proposition 11) that the mapping is a bijection of onto the set of prime ideals of . If , is the annihilator of a monogenous submodule of ; then is the annihilator of the monogenous submodule of (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4, formula (9)) and hence . Conversely, suppose that is finitely generated and such that is associated with ; then there exists and such that is the annihilator of . Let be a system of generators of ; then and hence there exists such that . Let us write ; for all , , whence ; on the other hand, if satisfies , then by definition, whence . Then and .
Corollary
If the ring A is Noetherian, the mapping is a bijection of onto .
If A is not Noetherian, the mapping of to is not necessarily surjective (Exercise 1).
Proposition 6
Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module, S a multiplicative subset of A and Y the set of elements of which do not meet S. Then the kernel N of the canonical mapping is the unique submodule of M which satisfies the relations
By Proposition 4 of no. 1, there exists a submodule of M which satisfies the relations and . We need to prove . Consider the commutative diagram
where are the canonical homomorphisms. We shall show that and are injective, which will prove that and have the same kernel and hence .
As , every element of meets S. Then (Corollary to Proposition 5), whence (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2), which proves that is injective (Chapter II, §2, no. 4, Theorem 1). On the other hand, if belongs to the kernel K of , then (Chapter II, §2, no. 2, Proposition 4); hence since ; we deduce that (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2) and is injective.
3. Relations with the support
Let M be a module over a ring A. Recall that the set of prime ideals of A such that is called the support of M and is denoted by (Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Definition 5).
Proposition 7
Let A be a ring and M an A-module.
(i) Every prime ideal of A containing an element belongs to .
(ii) Conversely, if A is Noetherian, every ideal contains an element .
If contains an element of , then and hence, if we write , is a prime ideal associated with , (no. 2, Proposition 5) and a fortiori , hence . Conversely, if A is Noetherian, so is A, (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4, Corollary 2 to Proposition 10). If , then (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2) and hence there exists such that (no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5).
Corollary 1
If M is a module over a Noetherian ring, then and these two sets have the same minimal elements.
Corollary 2
The nilradical of a Noetherian ring A is the intersection of the ideals .
We know that the nilradical of A is the intersection of the minimal elements of (Chapter II, § 2, no. 6, Proposition 13).
4. The case of finitely generated modules over a noetherian ring
Theorem 1
Let A be a Noetherian ring and M a finitely generated A-module. There exists a composition series of M such that, for , is isomorphic to , where is a prime ideal of A.
Let be the set of submodules of M which have a composition series with the property of the statement. As is non-empty (for belongs to ) and M is Noetherian, has a maximal element N. If , then and hence (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2); therefore contains a submodule isomorphic to an A-module of the form , where is prime; then by definition , which contradicts the maximal character of N. Then necessarily .
Theorem 2
Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A and a composition series of M such that, for , is isomorphic to where is a prime ideal of A. Then
(4)
the minimal elements of these three sets are the same and coincide with the minimal elements of the set of prime ideals containing Ann(M).
The inclusion Ass(M) follows immediately from Propositions 1 and 3 of no. 1. For ,
(Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Example), whence (Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Proposition 16), which shows the inclusion
Corollary 1 to Proposition 7 of no. 3 shows that Ass(M) and Supp(M) have the same minimal elements and (4) shows that these are just the minimal elements of . The last assertion then follows from Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Proposition 17.
Corollary
If M is a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A, Ass(M) is finite.
Under the conditions of Theorem 2, the set is not necessarily determined uniquely by M; in particular it may be distinct from Ass(M) (Exercise 6).
Proposition 8
Let A be a Noetherian ring, a an ideal of A and M a finitely generated A-module. The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) there exists an element x of M such that . (b) for all , there exists an element x of M such that ; (c) there exists such that .
Clearly (a) implies (b). By virtue of no. 1, Corollary 2 to Proposition 2, condition (b) means that the ideal a is contained in the union of the prime ideals associated with M and hence in one of them since Ass(M) is finite (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 2); thus (b) implies (c). Finally, if there exists such that , p is the annihilator of an element of M (no. 1, Definition 1) and ; thus (c) implies (a).
Proposition 9
Let A be a Noetherian ring, a an ideal of A and M a finitely generated A-module. For there to exist an integer such that , it is necessary and sufficient that a be contained in the intersection of the prime ideals associated with M.
This intersection is also that of the minimal elements of Supp(M) (no. 3, Corollary 1 to Proposition 7) and to say that a is contained in this intersection is equivalent to saying that in the notation of Chapter II, § 4; the conclusion then follows from Chapter 11, § 4, no. 4, Corollary 2 to Proposition 17.
Definition 2
Given an -module , an endomorphism of is called almost nilpotent if, for all , there exists an integer such that .
If is finitely generated, every almost nilpotent endomorphism is nilpotent.
Corollary
Let be a Noetherian ring. an -module and an element of . For the homomorphism of to be almost nilpotent, it is necessary and sufficient that belong to every ideal of .
The condition of the statement is equivalent to saying that for all there exists such that ; by Proposition 9 this means also that belongs to all the prime ideals associated with the submodule of ; the corollary then follows from the fact that is the union of the where runs through (no. 1, formula (1)).
Proposition 10
Let be a Noetherian ring, a finitely generated -module and an -module. Then
By hypothesis, is isomorphic to an -module of the form , hence is isomorphic to a submodule of and the latter is isomorphic to ; now, (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 3); thus . On the other hand,
for every prime ideal of , is isomorphic to (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 7, Proposition 19), whence our assertion immediately; then we conclude from Theorem 2 that
Conversely, let be a prime ideal of belonging to . By definition, contains a submodule isomorphic to . On the other hand, since is finitely generated and , we know that there exists a homomorphism from to (Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Proposition 20). As there exists an injective homomorphism from to , and . On the other hand, the relation for some is equivalent to , the annihilator of every element of being ; then certainly .
Exercises
See the exercises for § 1.