Bourbaki

1. Prime ideals associated with a module

1. Definition of associated prime ideals

Definition 1

Let M be a module over a ring A. A prime ideal p is said to be associated with M if there exists x ∈ M such that p is equal to the annihilator & x. The set of prime ideals associated with M is denoted by Ass_A(M), or simply Ass(M).

\* Example. Let a be an ideal in the polynomial ring A = \mathbf{C}[X_1, ..., X_n], V the corresponding affine algebraic variety and V_1, ..., V_p the irreducible components of V. If M is taken to be the ring A/a of functions which are regular on V, the set of prime ideals associated with M consists of the ideals of V_1, ..., V_p and in general other prime ideals each of which contains one of the ideals of the V_i. \*

As the annihilator of 0 is A, an element x ∈ M whose annihilator is a prime ideal is necessarily ≠ 0. To say that a prime idea p is associated with M

(*) The results of this chapter depend only on Books I to VI and Chapters I to III of this Book, excluding Chapter I, § 4 and Chapter III, § 5.

amounts to saying that MM contains a submodule isomorphic to A/pA/p (namely AxAx, for all x∈Mx \in M whose annihilator is pp).

If an AA-module MM is the union of a family (Mi)i∈I(M_i)_{i \in I} of submodules, then clearly

Ass⁡(M)=⋃i∈IAss⁡(Mi). \operatorname{Ass}(M) = \bigcup_{i \in I} \operatorname{Ass}(M_i).

Proposition 1

For every prime ideal pp of a ring AA and every submodule M≠0M \neq 0 of A/pA/p, Ass⁡(M)={p}\operatorname{Ass}(M) = \{p\}.

As the ring A/pA/p is an integral domain, the annihilator of an element ≠0\neq 0 of A/pA/p is pp.

Proposition 2

Let MM be a module over a ring AA. Every maximal element of the set of ideals Ann⁡(x)\operatorname{Ann}(x) of AA, where xx runs through the set of elements ≠0\neq 0 of MM, belongs to Ass⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(M).

Let a=Ann⁡(x)a = \operatorname{Ann}(x) (x∈M,x≠0x \in M, x \neq 0) be such a maximal element; it is sufficient to show that aa is prime. As x≠0x \neq 0, a≠Aa \neq A. Let b,cb, c be elements of AA such that bc∈abc \in a and c∉ac \notin a. Then cx≠0cx \neq 0, b∈Ann⁡(cx)b \in \operatorname{Ann}(cx) and a⊂Ann⁡(cx)a \subset \operatorname{Ann}(cx). As aa is maximal, Ann⁡(cx)=a\operatorname{Ann}(cx) = a, whence b∈ab \in a, so that aa is prime.

Corollary 1

Let MM be a module over a Noetherian ring AA. Then the condition M≠{0}M \neq \{0\} is equivalent to Ass⁡(M)≠∅\operatorname{Ass}(M) \neq \varnothing.

If M={0}M = \{0\}, clearly Ass⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(M) is empty (without any hypothesis on AA). If M≠{0}M \neq \{0\}, the set of ideals of the form Ann⁡(x)\operatorname{Ann}(x), where x∈Mx \in M and x≠0x \neq 0, is non-empty and consists of ideals #A\# A; as AA is Noetherian, this set has a maximal element; then it suffices to apply Proposition 2.

Corollary 2

Let AA be a Noetherian ring, MM an AA-module and aa an element of AA. For the homothety on MM with ratio aa to be injective, it is necessary and sufficient that aa belong to no prime ideal associated with MM.

If aa belongs to a prime ideal p∈Ass⁡(M)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(M), then p=Ann⁡(x)p = \operatorname{Ann}(x), where x∈M,x≠0x \in M, x \neq 0; whence ax=0ax = 0 and the homothety with ratio aa is not injective. Conversely, if ax=0ax = 0 for some x∈Mx \in M such that x#0x \# 0, then Ax#{0}Ax \# \{0\}, whence Ass⁡(x)≠∅\operatorname{Ass}(x) \neq \varnothing (Corollary 1). Let p∈Ass⁡(Ax)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(Ax); then obviously p∈Ass⁡(M)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(M) and p=Ann⁡(bx)p = \operatorname{Ann}(bx), where b∈Ab \in A; whence a∈pa \in p, since abx=0abx = 0.

Corollary 3

The set of divisors of zero in a Noetherian ring AA is the union of the ideals p∈Ass⁡(A)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(A).

Proposition 3

Let AA be a ring, MM an AA-module and NN a submodule of NN. Then*

Ass⁡(N)⊂Ass⁡(M)⊂Ass⁡(N)∪Ass⁡(M/N). \operatorname{Ass}(N) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(M) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(N) \cup \operatorname{Ass}(M/N).
The inclusion Ass⁡(N)⊂Ass⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(N) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(M) is obvious. Let p∈Ass⁡(M)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(M), EE be a submodule of MM isomorphic to A/pA/p and F=E∩NF = E \cap N. If F={0}F = \{0\}, EE is isomorphic to a submodule of M/NM/N, whence p∈Ass⁡(M/N)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(M/N). If F≠{0}F \neq \{0\}, the annihilator of every element ≠0\neq 0 of FF is pp (Proposition 1) and hence p∈Ass⁡(F)⊂Ass⁡(N)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(F) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(N).

Corollary 1

If an A-module MM is the direct sum of a family (Mi)i∈I(M_i)_{i \in I} of submodules, then* Ass⁡(M)=⋃i∈IAss⁡(Mi)\operatorname{Ass}(M) = \bigcup_{i \in I} \operatorname{Ass}(M_i).

It may be reduced to the case where II is finite by means of (1), then to the case where Card⁡(I)=2\operatorname{Card}(I) = 2 by induction on Card⁡(I)\operatorname{Card}(I). Then let I={i,j}I = \{i, j\}, where i≠ji \neq j; as M/MiM/M_i is isomorphic to MjM_j, Ass⁡(M)⊂Ass⁡(Mi)∪Ass⁡(Mj)\operatorname{Ass}(M) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(M_i) \cup \operatorname{Ass}(M_j) (Proposition 3); moreover, Ass⁡(Mi)\operatorname{Ass}(M_i) and Ass⁡(Mj)\operatorname{Ass}(M_j) are contained in Ass⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(M) (Proposition 3), whence the result.

Corollary 2

Let MM be an A-module and (Qi)i∈I(Q_i)_{i \in I} a finite family of submodules of MM. If* ⋂i∈IQi={0}\bigcap_{i \in I} Q_i = \{0\}, then

Ass⁡(M)⊂⋃i∈IAss⁡(M/Qi). \operatorname{Ass}(M) \subset \bigcup_{i \in I} \operatorname{Ass}(M/Q_i).
The canonical mapping M→⨁i∈I(M/Qi)M \to \bigoplus_{i \in I} (M/Q_i) is injective; then it suffices to apply Proposition 3 and its Corollary 1.

Proposition 4

Let MM be an A-module and Φ\Phi a subset of Ass⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(M). Then there exists a submodule NN of MM such that* Ass⁡(N)=Ass⁡(M)−Φ\operatorname{Ass}(N) = \operatorname{Ass}(M) - \Phi and Ass⁡(M/N)=Φ\operatorname{Ass}(M/N) = \Phi.

Let E\mathscr{E} be the set of submodules PP of MM such that Ass⁡(P)⊂Ass⁡(M)−Φ\operatorname{Ass}(P) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(M) - \Phi. Formula (1) shows that the set E\mathscr{E}, ordered by inclusion, is inductive; moreover, {0}∈E\{0\} \in \mathscr{E} and hence E≠∅\mathscr{E} \neq \varnothing. Let NN be a maximal element of E\mathscr{E}. Then Ass⁡(N)⊂Ass⁡(M)−Φ\operatorname{Ass}(N) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(M) - \Phi. We shall see that Ass⁡(M/N)⊂Φ\operatorname{Ass}(M/N) \subset \Phi, which, by Proposition 3, will complete the proof. Let p∈Ass⁡(M/N)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(M/N); then M/NM/N contains a submodule F/NF/N isomorphic to A/pA/p. By Propositions 1 and 3, Ass⁡(F)⊂Ass⁡(N)∪{p}\operatorname{Ass}(F) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(N) \cup \{p\}. Since NN is maximal in E\mathscr{E}, F∉EF \notin \mathscr{E} and hence p∈Φp \in \Phi.

2. Localization of associated prime ideals

Proposition 5

Let AA be a ring, SS a multiplicative subset of AA, Φ\Phi the set of prime ideals of AA which do not meet SS and MM an A-module. Then*: (i) The mapping p↦S−1pp \mapsto S^{-1}p is a bijection of Ass⁡A(M)∩Φ\operatorname{Ass}_A(M) \cap \Phi onto a subset of Ass⁡S−1A(S−1M)\operatorname{Ass}_{S^{-1}A}(S^{-1}M). (ii) If p∈Φp \in \Phi is a finitely generated ideal and S−1p∈Ass⁡S−1A(S−1M)S^{-1}p \in \operatorname{Ass}_{S^{-1}A}(S^{-1}M), then p∈Ass⁡A(M)p \in \operatorname{Ass}_A(M).

Recall (Chapter II, § 2, no. 5, Proposition 11) that the mapping p↦S−1pp \mapsto S^{-1}p is a bijection of Φ\Phi onto the set of prime ideals of S−1AS^{-1}A. If p∈Ass⁡A(M)∩Φp \in \operatorname{Ass}_A(M) \cap \Phi, pp is the annihilator of a monogenous submodule NN of MM; then S−1pS^{-1}p is the annihilator of the monogenous submodule S−1NS^{-1}N of S−1MS^{-1}M (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4, formula (9)) and hence S−1p∈AssS−1A(S−1M)S^{-1}\mathfrak{p} \in \mathrm{Ass}_{S^{-1}A}(S^{-1}M). Conversely, suppose that p∈Φ\mathfrak{p} \in \Phi is finitely generated and such that S−1pS^{-1}\mathfrak{p} is associated with S−1MS^{-1}M; then there exists x∈Mx \in M and t∈St \in S such that S−1pS^{-1}\mathfrak{p} is the annihilator of x/tx/t. Let (ai)1≤i≤n(a_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} be a system of generators of p\mathfrak{p}; then (ai/1)(x/t)=0(a_i/1)(x/t) = 0 and hence there exists si∈Ss_i \in S such that siaix=0 (1≤i≤n)s_i a_i x = 0 \ (1 \leq i \leq n). Let us write s=s1s2…sns = s_1 s_2 \ldots s_n; for all a∈pa \in \mathfrak{p}, sax=0s a x = 0, whence p⊂Ann(sx)p \subset \mathrm{Ann}(s x); on the other hand, if b∈Ab \in A satisfies bsx=0b s x = 0, then b/1∈S−1pb/1 \in S^{-1}\mathfrak{p} by definition, whence b∈pb \in \mathfrak{p}. Then p=Ann(sx)\mathfrak{p} = \mathrm{Ann}(s x) and p∈AssA(M)\mathfrak{p} \in \mathrm{Ass}_A(M).

Corollary

If the ring A is Noetherian, the mapping p↦S−1p\mathfrak{p} \mapsto S^{-1}\mathfrak{p} is a bijection of AssA(M)∩Φ\mathrm{Ass}_A(M) \cap \Phi onto AssS−1A(S−1M)\mathrm{Ass}_{S^{-1}A}(S^{-1}M).

If A is not Noetherian, the mapping p↦S−1pp \mapsto S^{-1}p of AssA(M)∩Φ\mathrm{Ass}_A(M) \cap \Phi to AssS−1A(S−1M)\mathrm{Ass}_{S^{-1}A}(S^{-1}M) is not necessarily surjective (Exercise 1).

Proposition 6

Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module, S a multiplicative subset of A and Y the set of elements of AssA(M)\mathrm{Ass}_A(M) which do not meet S. Then the kernel N of the canonical mapping M→S−1MM \to S^{-1}M is the unique submodule of M which satisfies the relations

Ass(N)=Ass(M)−Ψ,Ass(M/N)=Ψ. \mathrm{Ass}(N) = \mathrm{Ass}(M) - \Psi, \quad \mathrm{Ass}(M/N) = \Psi.

By Proposition 4 of no. 1, there exists a submodule N′N' of M which satisfies the relations Ass(N′)=Ass(M)−Y\mathrm{Ass}(N') = \mathrm{Ass}(M) - Y and Ass(M/N′)=Ψ\mathrm{Ass}(M/N') = \Psi. We need to prove N=N′N = N'. Consider the commutative diagram

M→pM/N′∣u∣∣v∣S−1M→S−1pS−1(M/N′) \begin{array}{ccc} M & \xrightarrow{p} & M/N' \\ |u| & & |v| \\ S^{-1}M & \xrightarrow{S^{-1}p} & S^{-1}(M/N') \end{array}

where p,u,vp, u, v are the canonical homomorphisms. We shall show that S−1pS^{-1}p and vv are injective, which will prove that uu and pp have the same kernel and hence N=N′N = N'.

As Ass(N′)∩Ψ=∅\mathrm{Ass}(N') \cap \Psi = \varnothing, every element of Ass(N′)\mathrm{Ass}(N') meets S. Then AssS−1A(S−1N′)=∅\mathrm{Ass}_{S^{-1}A}(S^{-1}N') = \varnothing (Corollary to Proposition 5), whence S−1N′={0}S^{-1}N' = \{0\} (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2), which proves that S−1pS^{-1}p is injective (Chapter II, §2, no. 4, Theorem 1). On the other hand, if xx belongs to the kernel K of vv, then Ann(x)∩S≠∅\mathrm{Ann}(x) \cap S \neq \varnothing (Chapter II, §2, no. 2, Proposition 4); hence Ass(K)=∅\mathrm{Ass}(K) = \varnothing since Ass(K)⊂Ass(M/N′)=Ψ\mathrm{Ass}(K) \subset \mathrm{Ass}(M/N') = \Psi; we deduce that K={0}K = \{0\} (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2) and vv is injective.

3. Relations with the support

Let M be a module over a ring A. Recall that the set of prime ideals p\mathfrak{p} of A such that M,≠0M, \neq 0 is called the support of M and is denoted by Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M) (Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Definition 5).

Proposition 7

Let A be a ring and M an A-module.

(i) Every prime ideal p\mathfrak{p} of A containing an element ∈Ass⁡(M)\in \operatorname{Ass}(M) belongs to Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M).

(ii) Conversely, if A is Noetherian, every ideal p∈Supp⁡(M)\mathfrak{p} \in \operatorname{Supp}(M) contains an element ∈Ass⁡(M)\in \operatorname{Ass}(M).

If p\mathfrak{p} contains an element qq of Ass⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(M), then q∩(A−p)=∅q \cap (A - \mathfrak{p}) = \varnothing and hence, if we write S=A−pS = A - \mathfrak{p}, S−1pS^{-1}\mathfrak{p} is a prime ideal associated with S−1M=MS^{-1}M = M, (no. 2, Proposition 5) and a fortiori M,#0M, \# 0, hence p∈Supp⁡(M)\mathfrak{p} \in \operatorname{Supp}(M). Conversely, if A is Noetherian, so is A, (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4, Corollary 2 to Proposition 10). If Mp≠0M_{\mathfrak{p}} \neq 0, then Ass⁡Ap(Mp)≠0\operatorname{Ass}_{A_{\mathfrak{p}}}(M_{\mathfrak{p}}) \neq 0 (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2) and hence there exists q∈Ass⁡A(M)q \in \operatorname{Ass}_A(M) such that q∩(A−p)=∅q \cap (A - \mathfrak{p}) = \varnothing (no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5).

Corollary 1

If M is a module over a Noetherian ring, then Ass⁡(M)⊂Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(M) \subset \operatorname{Supp}(M) and these two sets have the same minimal elements.

Corollary 2

The nilradical of a Noetherian ring A is the intersection of the ideals p∈Ass⁡(A)\mathfrak{p} \in \operatorname{Ass}(A).

We know that the nilradical of A is the intersection of the minimal elements of Spec⁡(A)=Supp⁡(A)\operatorname{Spec}(A) = \operatorname{Supp}(A) (Chapter II, § 2, no. 6, Proposition 13).

4. The case of finitely generated modules over a noetherian ring

Theorem 1

Let A be a Noetherian ring and M a finitely generated A-module. There exists a composition series (Mi)0≤i≤n(M_i)_{0 \leq i \leq n} of M such that, for 0≤i≤n−10 \leq i \leq n - 1, Mi/Mi+1M_i / M_{i+1} is isomorphic to A/piA / \mathfrak{p}_i, where pi\mathfrak{p}_i is a prime ideal of A.

Let G\mathscr{G} be the set of submodules of M which have a composition series with the property of the statement. As G\mathscr{G} is non-empty (for {0}\{0\} belongs to G\mathscr{G}) and M is Noetherian, G\mathscr{G} has a maximal element N. If M≠NM \neq N, then M/N≠0M/N \neq 0 and hence Ass⁡(M/N)≠∅\operatorname{Ass}(M/N) \neq \varnothing (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2); M/NM/N therefore contains a submodule N′/NN'/N isomorphic to an A-module of the form A/pA/\mathfrak{p}, where p\mathfrak{p} is prime; then by definition N′∈GN' \in \mathscr{G}, which contradicts the maximal character of N. Then necessarily N=MN = M.

Theorem 2

Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A and (Mi)0≤i≤n(M_i)_{0 \leq i \leq n} a composition series of M such that, for 0≤i≤n−10 \leq i \leq n - 1, Mi/Mi+1M_i / M_{i+1} is isomorphic to A/piA / \mathfrak{p}_i where pi\mathfrak{p}_i is a prime ideal of A. Then

(4)

Ass⁡(M)⊂{p0,…,pn−1}⊂Supp⁡(M); \operatorname{Ass}(M) \subset \{\mathfrak{p}_0, \ldots, \mathfrak{p}_{n-1}\} \subset \operatorname{Supp}(M);

the minimal elements of these three sets are the same and coincide with the minimal elements of the set of prime ideals containing Ann(M).

The inclusion Ass(M) ⊂{p0,…,pn−1}\subset \{p_0, \ldots, p_{n-1}\} follows immediately from Propositions 1 and 3 of no. 1. For 0≤i≤n−10 \leq i \leq n - 1,

pi∈Supp⁡(A/pi)=Supp⁡(Mi/Mi+1) p_i \in \operatorname{Supp}(A/p_i) = \operatorname{Supp}(M_i/M_{i+1})

(Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Example), whence pi∈Supp⁡(Mi)⊂Supp⁡(M)p_i \in \operatorname{Supp}(M_i) \subset \operatorname{Supp}(M) (Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Proposition 16), which shows the inclusion

{p0,…,pn−1}⊂Supp⁡(M). \{p_0, \ldots, p_{n-1}\} \subset \operatorname{Supp}(M).

Corollary 1 to Proposition 7 of no. 3 shows that Ass(M) and Supp(M) have the same minimal elements and (4) shows that these are just the minimal elements of {p0,…,pn−1}\{p_0, \ldots, p_{n-1}\}. The last assertion then follows from Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Proposition 17.

Corollary

If M is a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring A, Ass(M) is finite.

Under the conditions of Theorem 2, the set {p0,…,pn−1}\{p_0, \ldots, p_{n-1}\} is not necessarily determined uniquely by M; in particular it may be distinct from Ass(M) (Exercise 6).

Proposition 8

Let A be a Noetherian ring, a an ideal of A and M a finitely generated A-module. The following conditions are equivalent:

(a) there exists an element x #O\# O of M such that ax=0ax = 0. (b) for all a∈aa \in a, there exists an element x ≠O\neq O of M such that ax=0ax = 0; (c) there exists p∈Ass⁡(M)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(M) such that a⊂pa \subset p.

Clearly (a) implies (b). By virtue of no. 1, Corollary 2 to Proposition 2, condition (b) means that the ideal a is contained in the union of the prime ideals associated with M and hence in one of them since Ass(M) is finite (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 2); thus (b) implies (c). Finally, if there exists p∈Ass⁡(M)p \in \operatorname{Ass}(M) such that a⊂pa \subset p, p is the annihilator of an element x≠0x \neq 0 of M (no. 1, Definition 1) and ax=0ax = 0; thus (c) implies (a).

Proposition 9

Let A be a Noetherian ring, a an ideal of A and M a finitely generated A-module. For there to exist an integer n>0n > 0 such that anM=0a^n M = 0, it is necessary and sufficient that a be contained in the intersection of the prime ideals associated with M.

This intersection is also that of the minimal elements of Supp(M) (no. 3, Corollary 1 to Proposition 7) and to say that a is contained in this intersection is equivalent to saying that V(a)⊃Supp⁡(M)V(a) \supset \operatorname{Supp}(M) in the notation of Chapter II, § 4; the conclusion then follows from Chapter 11, § 4, no. 4, Corollary 2 to Proposition 17.

Definition 2

Given an AA-module MM, an endomorphism uu of MM is called almost nilpotent if, for all x∈Mx \in M, there exists an integer n(x)>0n(x) > 0 such that un(x)(x)=0u^{n(x)}(x) = 0.

If MM is finitely generated, every almost nilpotent endomorphism is nilpotent.

Corollary

Let AA be a Noetherian ring. MM an AA-module and aa an element of AA. For the homomorphism aM:x↦axa_M : x \mapsto ax of MM to be almost nilpotent, it is necessary and sufficient that aa belong to every ideal of Ass⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(M).

The condition of the statement is equivalent to saying that for all x∈Mx \in M there exists n(x)>0n(x) > 0 such that (Aa)n(x)(Ax)=0(Aa)^{n(x)}(Ax) = 0; by Proposition 9 this means also that aa belongs to all the prime ideals associated with the submodule AxAx of MM; the corollary then follows from the fact that Ass⁡(M)\operatorname{Ass}(M) is the union of the Ass⁡(Ax)\operatorname{Ass}(Ax) where xx runs through MM (no. 1, formula (1)).

Proposition 10

Let AA be a Noetherian ring, EE a finitely generated AA-module and FF an AA-module. Then

Ass⁡(Hom⁡A(E,F))=Ass⁡(F)∩Supp⁡(E). \operatorname{Ass}(\operatorname{Hom}_A(E, F)) = \operatorname{Ass}(F) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(E).

By hypothesis, EE is isomorphic to an AA-module of the form An/RA^n/R, hence Hom⁡A(E,F)\operatorname{Hom}_A(E, F) is isomorphic to a submodule of Hom⁡A(An,F)\operatorname{Hom}_A(A^n, F) and the latter is isomorphic to FnF^n; now, Ass⁡(Fn)=Ass⁡(F)\operatorname{Ass}(F^n) = \operatorname{Ass}(F) (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 3); thus Ass⁡(Hom⁡A(E,F))⊂Ass⁡(F)\operatorname{Ass}(\operatorname{Hom}_A(E, F)) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(F). On the other hand,

Supp⁡(Hom⁡A(E,F))⊂Supp⁡(E): \operatorname{Supp}(\operatorname{Hom}_A(E, F)) \subset \operatorname{Supp}(E):

for every prime ideal pp of AA, Hom⁡Ap(Ep,Fp)\operatorname{Hom}_{A_p}(E_p, F_p) is isomorphic to (Hom⁡A(E,F))p(\operatorname{Hom}_A(E, F))_p (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 7, Proposition 19), whence our assertion immediately; then we conclude from Theorem 2 that

Ass⁡(Hom⁡A(E,F))⊂Supp⁡(E). \operatorname{Ass}(\operatorname{Hom}_A(E, F)) \subset \operatorname{Supp}(E).

Conversely, let pp be a prime ideal of AA belonging to Ass⁡(F)∩Supp⁡(E)\operatorname{Ass}(F) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(E). By definition, FF contains a submodule isomorphic to A/pA/p. On the other hand, since EE is finitely generated and E,≠0E, \neq 0, we know that there exists a homomorphism w≠0w \neq 0 from EE to A/pA/p (Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Proposition 20). As there exists an injective homomorphism jj from A/pA/p to FF, j∘w∈Hom⁡(E,F)j \circ w \in \operatorname{Hom}(E, F) and j∘w≠0j \circ w \neq 0. On the other hand, the relation aw=0aw = 0 for some a∈Aa \in A is equivalent to a∈pa \in p, the annihilator of every element ≠0\neq 0 of A/pA/p being pp; then certainly p∈Ass⁡(Hom⁡A(E,F))p \in \operatorname{Ass}(\operatorname{Hom}_A(E, F)).

Exercises

See the exercises for § 1.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.