Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
(a) Let K0 be a perfect field of characteristic p>0, L the field of rational functions K0(Xn)n∈N, A′ the ring of formal power series L[[Y,Z]], where Y and Z are two indeterminates, and A the tensor product ring K[[Y,Z]]⊗KL, where we write K=Lp⊂L; A is a Noetherian local ring, which is not complete and whose completion is identified with A′ (Chapter III, § 3, Exercise 17) and A is integral over A. Let cn denote the element
XnY+Xn+1YZ+Xn+2YZ2+…
of A′. Let B be the subring of A′ generated by A and the elements cn (n≥0). If C=A[c0], C is Noetherian and the ring B (which is not integrally closed) is contained in the integral closure of C and contains C; but show that B is not Noetherian (observe that cn does not belong to the ideal of B generated by the ci of index i<n).
(b) Suppose p=2; K0,K and L being used with the same meaning as in (a), consider this time the ring of formal power series A′=L[[Y,Z,T]] in three indeterminates, the subring
A=K[[Y,Z,T]]⊗KL,
and write
b=Yn≥0∑X2nTn+Zn≥0∑X2n+1Tn. Show that the ring
A[b] is Noetherian but that its integral closure B is not a Noetherian ring. (As
b2∈A, every element of the field of fractions of
A[b] is of the form
P+Qb, where P and Q are linear combinations of a finite number of
Xk with coefficients in the field of fractions of
K[[Y,Z,T]]; for such an element to be integral over
A[b], show that it is necessary and sufficient that it belong to
A′. Show that B is generated by the elements
bi=Yn≥0∑X2(i+n)Tn+Zn≥0∑X2(i+n)+1Tnfor i≥0 and conclude the argument as in (a).)